评估SRK T和HOFFER Q公式在三级护理中心白内障超声乳化白内障后房型人工晶状体计算中准确性的比较研究

N. Apoorva, HMohan Kumar, Shreya, B. Rachana, Sana Rasheed, Jyotsana Soni
{"title":"评估SRK T和HOFFER Q公式在三级护理中心白内障超声乳化白内障后房型人工晶状体计算中准确性的比较研究","authors":"N. Apoorva, HMohan Kumar, Shreya, B. Rachana, Sana Rasheed, Jyotsana Soni","doi":"10.4103/jcor.jcor_29_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives: The aim is to compare the accuracy of the SRK T and HOFFER Q formulas in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in long eyes by noting the postoperative visual outcome. Introduction: Senile cataract is a leading cause of blindness in India. Cataracts are managed by cataract extraction with implantation IOL. Before surgery, IOL power is calculated by biometry. IOL power calculation is the main key to obtaining a good refractive outcome after cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based study was conducted prospectively to evaluate IOL power using SRK T and HOFFER Q formulae in patients undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens in long eyes over a period of 18 months. Thirty patients were studied based on inclusion criteria. A detailed clinical examination, pre- and postoperative visual acuity, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and refraction were done on day 30 postsurgery. Results: The study included 30 cases with 15 patients in either group, of which 63% were male and 37% were female; 95% of the patients were aged above 50 years; the maximum number of patients in either group had an axial length in the range of 24.5–25 mm; the maximum preoperative ACD was between 3 and 4.5 mm and the maximum postoperative ACD was between 4 and 4.5 mm in both groups; 40% of the patients in either group had 6/6 vision; spherical refractive error postoperative was seen in 73% in the SRK T group and 68% in the HOFFER Q group; and cylindrical refractive error was seen in 27% in SRK T group and 32% in HOFFER Q group. Conclusion: Either formula can be used for IOL power calculation in eyes up to 26.5 mm, as not much difference in postoperative refractive error was observed. Both formulas had a lesser degree of spherical error and an equally good visual outcome postoperatively. Careful biometry is important to prevent postoperative surprises.","PeriodicalId":33073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"158 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study to assess the accuracy of the SRK T and HOFFER Q formulas in the intraocular lens calculation of long eyes undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens in a tertiary care center\",\"authors\":\"N. Apoorva, HMohan Kumar, Shreya, B. Rachana, Sana Rasheed, Jyotsana Soni\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcor.jcor_29_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims and Objectives: The aim is to compare the accuracy of the SRK T and HOFFER Q formulas in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in long eyes by noting the postoperative visual outcome. Introduction: Senile cataract is a leading cause of blindness in India. Cataracts are managed by cataract extraction with implantation IOL. Before surgery, IOL power is calculated by biometry. IOL power calculation is the main key to obtaining a good refractive outcome after cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based study was conducted prospectively to evaluate IOL power using SRK T and HOFFER Q formulae in patients undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens in long eyes over a period of 18 months. Thirty patients were studied based on inclusion criteria. A detailed clinical examination, pre- and postoperative visual acuity, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and refraction were done on day 30 postsurgery. Results: The study included 30 cases with 15 patients in either group, of which 63% were male and 37% were female; 95% of the patients were aged above 50 years; the maximum number of patients in either group had an axial length in the range of 24.5–25 mm; the maximum preoperative ACD was between 3 and 4.5 mm and the maximum postoperative ACD was between 4 and 4.5 mm in both groups; 40% of the patients in either group had 6/6 vision; spherical refractive error postoperative was seen in 73% in the SRK T group and 68% in the HOFFER Q group; and cylindrical refractive error was seen in 27% in SRK T group and 32% in HOFFER Q group. Conclusion: Either formula can be used for IOL power calculation in eyes up to 26.5 mm, as not much difference in postoperative refractive error was observed. Both formulas had a lesser degree of spherical error and an equally good visual outcome postoperatively. Careful biometry is important to prevent postoperative surprises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"158 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_29_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_29_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目的:通过注意术后视觉效果,比较SRK T和HOFFER Q公式在长眼人工晶状体(IOL)度数计算中的准确性。引言:在印度,老年性白内障是导致失明的主要原因。白内障是通过白内障摘除和人工晶状体植入来治疗的。手术前,人工晶状体的度数是通过生物测量来计算的。人工晶状体屈光力的计算是白内障手术后获得良好屈光效果的主要关键。材料和方法:前瞻性地进行了一项基于医院的研究,用SRK T和HOFFER Q公式评估了在18个月内接受长眼后房型人工晶状体超声乳化术的患者的IOL功率。根据纳入标准对30名患者进行了研究。术后第30天进行详细的临床检查、术前和术后视力、前房深度(ACD)和屈光度。结果:本研究包括30例患者,每组15例,其中63%为男性,37%为女性;95%的患者年龄在50岁以上;两组患者的最大轴向长度在24.5-25毫米之间;两组术前最大ACD在3至4.5mm之间,术后最大ACD为4至4.5mm;两组中有40%的患者视力为6/6;SRK T组和HOFFER Q组术后出现球面屈光不正的比例分别为73%和68%;SRK T组和HOFFER Q组的柱面折射率分别为27%和32%。结论:任意一个公式都可以用于26.5mm以下的人工晶状体度数计算,因为术后屈光不正差异不大。两种配方奶粉的球面误差较小,术后视觉效果同样良好。仔细的生物测量对于预防术后意外情况非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study to assess the accuracy of the SRK T and HOFFER Q formulas in the intraocular lens calculation of long eyes undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens in a tertiary care center
Aims and Objectives: The aim is to compare the accuracy of the SRK T and HOFFER Q formulas in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in long eyes by noting the postoperative visual outcome. Introduction: Senile cataract is a leading cause of blindness in India. Cataracts are managed by cataract extraction with implantation IOL. Before surgery, IOL power is calculated by biometry. IOL power calculation is the main key to obtaining a good refractive outcome after cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based study was conducted prospectively to evaluate IOL power using SRK T and HOFFER Q formulae in patients undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens in long eyes over a period of 18 months. Thirty patients were studied based on inclusion criteria. A detailed clinical examination, pre- and postoperative visual acuity, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and refraction were done on day 30 postsurgery. Results: The study included 30 cases with 15 patients in either group, of which 63% were male and 37% were female; 95% of the patients were aged above 50 years; the maximum number of patients in either group had an axial length in the range of 24.5–25 mm; the maximum preoperative ACD was between 3 and 4.5 mm and the maximum postoperative ACD was between 4 and 4.5 mm in both groups; 40% of the patients in either group had 6/6 vision; spherical refractive error postoperative was seen in 73% in the SRK T group and 68% in the HOFFER Q group; and cylindrical refractive error was seen in 27% in SRK T group and 32% in HOFFER Q group. Conclusion: Either formula can be used for IOL power calculation in eyes up to 26.5 mm, as not much difference in postoperative refractive error was observed. Both formulas had a lesser degree of spherical error and an equally good visual outcome postoperatively. Careful biometry is important to prevent postoperative surprises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信