儿童最大利益在ECtHR移民判例法中的不确定地位

Q2 Social Sciences
Jennie Edlund, V. Stehlík
{"title":"儿童最大利益在ECtHR移民判例法中的不确定地位","authors":"Jennie Edlund, V. Stehlík","doi":"10.2478/iclr-2020-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary It has been highlighted that in the area of immigration law the protection offered by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) to children and family life is arguably at its weakest. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) immigration case law on Article 8 ECHR has shown an uneven and uncertain application of the child’s best interests. Little significance is attached to the child’s respect for family life when determining whether the immigration measure is compatible with the ECHR. This paper will explore how the Court is identifying the best interests of the child and analyse what weight the Court apportions to the best interests of the child when balancing the state’s and the applicant’s interests. It will also examine whether the Court priori-tize migration control over the child’s best interests in cases where both family matters and immigration matters are involved.","PeriodicalId":36722,"journal":{"name":"International and Comparative Law Review","volume":"20 1","pages":"93 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Uncertain Place of the Child’s Best Interests in ECtHR’s Immigration Case Law\",\"authors\":\"Jennie Edlund, V. Stehlík\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/iclr-2020-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary It has been highlighted that in the area of immigration law the protection offered by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) to children and family life is arguably at its weakest. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) immigration case law on Article 8 ECHR has shown an uneven and uncertain application of the child’s best interests. Little significance is attached to the child’s respect for family life when determining whether the immigration measure is compatible with the ECHR. This paper will explore how the Court is identifying the best interests of the child and analyse what weight the Court apportions to the best interests of the child when balancing the state’s and the applicant’s interests. It will also examine whether the Court priori-tize migration control over the child’s best interests in cases where both family matters and immigration matters are involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International and Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"93 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International and Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有人强调,在移民法领域,《欧洲人权公约》对儿童和家庭生活的保护可以说是最弱的。欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)关于《欧洲人权公约》第8条的移民判例法显示,儿童最大利益的适用不均衡且不确定。在确定移民措施是否符合《欧洲人权公约》时,儿童对家庭生活的尊重并不重要。本文将探讨法院如何确定儿童的最大利益,并分析法院在平衡国家利益和申请人利益时对儿童最大利益的权重。它还将审查在涉及家庭事务和移民事务的案件中,法院是否优先考虑对儿童最大利益的移民控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Uncertain Place of the Child’s Best Interests in ECtHR’s Immigration Case Law
Summary It has been highlighted that in the area of immigration law the protection offered by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) to children and family life is arguably at its weakest. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) immigration case law on Article 8 ECHR has shown an uneven and uncertain application of the child’s best interests. Little significance is attached to the child’s respect for family life when determining whether the immigration measure is compatible with the ECHR. This paper will explore how the Court is identifying the best interests of the child and analyse what weight the Court apportions to the best interests of the child when balancing the state’s and the applicant’s interests. It will also examine whether the Court priori-tize migration control over the child’s best interests in cases where both family matters and immigration matters are involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信