在儿童社会护理中提供心理咨询:一种混合方法服务评价

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
R. Clare, Kim Jackson-Blott
{"title":"在儿童社会护理中提供心理咨询:一种混合方法服务评价","authors":"R. Clare, Kim Jackson-Blott","doi":"10.1080/02650533.2022.2036108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It’s widely acknowledged that Social Work requires a more psychological approach when working with families. However, social care settings are under increased financial constraints and creative solutions are necessary. The provision of psychological consultations may be one way to meet this identified need; however, practice-based research is in its infancy. Using a mixed-methods approach, this service evaluation aimed to evaluate the provision of psychological consultations across community Social Care, and Residential Edge of Care teams. Quantitative analysis revealed that psychological consultations significantly improved consultees’ knowledge, confidence, motivation, and understanding – factors associated with best practice. Thematic analysis of the consultees’ qualitative feedback resulted in four key themes pertaining to areas of benefit: ‘enriching assessments’, ‘developing formulations’, ‘improving interventions’, and ‘supporting reflective professional practice’. Three key themes emerged in relation to what staff viewed as areas for improvement; that is: ‘changes to the process of consultation’, ‘changes to the content of consultation’, and ‘no improvement necessary’. These findings further evidence the beneficial impact of psychological consultations when provided across a range of Children’s Social Care settings. Psychology consultations therefore offer a promising means of promoting psychologically informed Social Care practice, contributing to best practice standards within the context of financial constraints.","PeriodicalId":46754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Practice","volume":"37 1","pages":"45 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing psychological consultation within children’s social care: a mixed-methods service evaluation\",\"authors\":\"R. Clare, Kim Jackson-Blott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02650533.2022.2036108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT It’s widely acknowledged that Social Work requires a more psychological approach when working with families. However, social care settings are under increased financial constraints and creative solutions are necessary. The provision of psychological consultations may be one way to meet this identified need; however, practice-based research is in its infancy. Using a mixed-methods approach, this service evaluation aimed to evaluate the provision of psychological consultations across community Social Care, and Residential Edge of Care teams. Quantitative analysis revealed that psychological consultations significantly improved consultees’ knowledge, confidence, motivation, and understanding – factors associated with best practice. Thematic analysis of the consultees’ qualitative feedback resulted in four key themes pertaining to areas of benefit: ‘enriching assessments’, ‘developing formulations’, ‘improving interventions’, and ‘supporting reflective professional practice’. Three key themes emerged in relation to what staff viewed as areas for improvement; that is: ‘changes to the process of consultation’, ‘changes to the content of consultation’, and ‘no improvement necessary’. These findings further evidence the beneficial impact of psychological consultations when provided across a range of Children’s Social Care settings. Psychology consultations therefore offer a promising means of promoting psychologically informed Social Care practice, contributing to best practice standards within the context of financial constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2036108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2036108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要人们普遍认为,在与家庭合作时,社会工作需要更多的心理方法。然而,社会护理环境面临越来越大的财政限制,需要创造性的解决方案。提供心理咨询可能是满足这一已确定需求的一种方式;然而,基于实践的研究尚处于起步阶段。该服务评估采用混合方法,旨在评估社区社会护理和住宅边缘护理团队提供的心理咨询。定量分析显示,心理咨询显著提高了被咨询者的知识、信心、动机和理解力,这些因素与最佳实践有关。对被咨询人的质量反馈进行专题分析,得出了与受益领域有关的四个关键主题:“丰富评估”、“制定公式”、“改进干预措施”和“支持反思性专业实践”。出现了三个关键主题,涉及工作人员认为需要改进的领域;即:“咨询过程的改变”、“咨询内容的改变”和“无需改进”。这些发现进一步证明了在一系列儿童社会护理环境中提供心理咨询的有益影响。因此,心理咨询为促进心理知情的社会护理实践提供了一种很有前途的手段,有助于在经济拮据的情况下达到最佳实践标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Providing psychological consultation within children’s social care: a mixed-methods service evaluation
ABSTRACT It’s widely acknowledged that Social Work requires a more psychological approach when working with families. However, social care settings are under increased financial constraints and creative solutions are necessary. The provision of psychological consultations may be one way to meet this identified need; however, practice-based research is in its infancy. Using a mixed-methods approach, this service evaluation aimed to evaluate the provision of psychological consultations across community Social Care, and Residential Edge of Care teams. Quantitative analysis revealed that psychological consultations significantly improved consultees’ knowledge, confidence, motivation, and understanding – factors associated with best practice. Thematic analysis of the consultees’ qualitative feedback resulted in four key themes pertaining to areas of benefit: ‘enriching assessments’, ‘developing formulations’, ‘improving interventions’, and ‘supporting reflective professional practice’. Three key themes emerged in relation to what staff viewed as areas for improvement; that is: ‘changes to the process of consultation’, ‘changes to the content of consultation’, and ‘no improvement necessary’. These findings further evidence the beneficial impact of psychological consultations when provided across a range of Children’s Social Care settings. Psychology consultations therefore offer a promising means of promoting psychologically informed Social Care practice, contributing to best practice standards within the context of financial constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Practice publishes high quality refereed articles devoted to the exploration and analysis of practice in social welfare and allied health professions from psychodynamic and systemic perspectives. This includes counselling, social care planning, education and training, research, institutional life, management and organisation or policy-making. Articles are also welcome that critically examine the psychodynamic tradition in the light of other theoretical orientations or explanatory systems. The Journal of Social Work Practice is committed to a policy of equal opportunities and actively strives to foster all forms of intercultural dialogue and debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信