麻醉类型对颞下颌关节紊乱病111关节穿刺术的影响:一项前瞻性研究结果

Q3 Dentistry
M. A. G. Clavero, M. V. S. Sanz, E. Donisa, Rocío Gallego Sobrino, L. E. Lasaga
{"title":"麻醉类型对颞下颌关节紊乱病111关节穿刺术的影响:一项前瞻性研究结果","authors":"M. A. G. Clavero, M. V. S. Sanz, E. Donisa, Rocío Gallego Sobrino, L. E. Lasaga","doi":"10.1051/mbcb/2021037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Temporomandibular dysfunction is a generic term that covers a large number of clinical problems affecting not only TMJ (Temporomandibular Joint), but also the masticatory musculature and related structures. Arthrocentesis is the most commonly used technique in patients with pain or limitation of the oral opening due to joint causes in which conservative treatment has failed. It is generally performed under local anesthesia and sedation, although depending on the type of patient and the preferences of the surgeon it can also be performed under general anesthesia. Material and method: A prospective, observational, analytical cohort study has been carried out to evaluate if the type of anesthesia, the drugs used for sedation and whether or not anesthetic induction is performed during arthrocentesis influence the results of 111 arthrocentesis performed in patients with TMJ pathology. Results: In patients who arthrocentesis was performed with propofol without midazolam the improvement in pain at one week and one month postarthrocentesis was greater than propofol with midazolam was used. Conclusion: The type of anesthesia could influence the results of arthrocentesis.","PeriodicalId":37322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the type of anesthesia on 111 arthrocentesis in temporomandibular joint disorders: results of a prospective study\",\"authors\":\"M. A. G. Clavero, M. V. S. Sanz, E. Donisa, Rocío Gallego Sobrino, L. E. Lasaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/mbcb/2021037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: Temporomandibular dysfunction is a generic term that covers a large number of clinical problems affecting not only TMJ (Temporomandibular Joint), but also the masticatory musculature and related structures. Arthrocentesis is the most commonly used technique in patients with pain or limitation of the oral opening due to joint causes in which conservative treatment has failed. It is generally performed under local anesthesia and sedation, although depending on the type of patient and the preferences of the surgeon it can also be performed under general anesthesia. Material and method: A prospective, observational, analytical cohort study has been carried out to evaluate if the type of anesthesia, the drugs used for sedation and whether or not anesthetic induction is performed during arthrocentesis influence the results of 111 arthrocentesis performed in patients with TMJ pathology. Results: In patients who arthrocentesis was performed with propofol without midazolam the improvement in pain at one week and one month postarthrocentesis was greater than propofol with midazolam was used. Conclusion: The type of anesthesia could influence the results of arthrocentesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2021037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2021037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:颞下颌功能障碍是一个通用术语,涵盖了大量的临床问题,不仅影响颞下颌关节,还影响咀嚼肌组织和相关结构。关节穿刺术是因关节原因导致疼痛或口腔开放受限的患者最常用的技术,保守治疗失败。它通常在局部麻醉和镇静下进行,尽管根据患者类型和外科医生的偏好,它也可以在全身麻醉下进行。材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、分析性队列研究,以评估麻醉类型、用于镇静的药物以及在关节穿刺过程中是否进行麻醉诱导是否会影响TMJ病理患者进行111关节穿刺的结果。结果:在使用丙泊酚而不使用咪唑安定进行关节穿刺的患者中,在关节穿刺后一周和一个月的疼痛改善程度大于使用丙泊酚和咪唑安定。结论:麻醉类型可能影响关节穿刺术的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of the type of anesthesia on 111 arthrocentesis in temporomandibular joint disorders: results of a prospective study
Aims: Temporomandibular dysfunction is a generic term that covers a large number of clinical problems affecting not only TMJ (Temporomandibular Joint), but also the masticatory musculature and related structures. Arthrocentesis is the most commonly used technique in patients with pain or limitation of the oral opening due to joint causes in which conservative treatment has failed. It is generally performed under local anesthesia and sedation, although depending on the type of patient and the preferences of the surgeon it can also be performed under general anesthesia. Material and method: A prospective, observational, analytical cohort study has been carried out to evaluate if the type of anesthesia, the drugs used for sedation and whether or not anesthetic induction is performed during arthrocentesis influence the results of 111 arthrocentesis performed in patients with TMJ pathology. Results: In patients who arthrocentesis was performed with propofol without midazolam the improvement in pain at one week and one month postarthrocentesis was greater than propofol with midazolam was used. Conclusion: The type of anesthesia could influence the results of arthrocentesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery
Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信