{"title":"浪漫比尔街","authors":"R. J. Corber","doi":"10.7227/jbr.5.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author reviews Barry Jenkins’s 2018 film adaptation of\n Baldwin’s novel, If Beale Street Could Talk, finding\n that Jenkins’s lush, painterly, and dreamlike visual style successfully\n translates Baldwin’s cadenced prose into cinematic language. But in\n interpreting the novel as the “perfect fusion” of the anger of\n Baldwin’s essays and the sensuality of his fiction, Jenkins overlooks the\n novel’s most significant aspect, its gender politics. Baldwin began\n working on If Beale Street Could Talk shortly after being\n interviewed by Black Arts poet Nikki Giovanni for the PBS television show,\n Soul!. Giovanni’s rejection of Baldwin’s\n claims that for black men to overcome the injuries of white supremacy they\n needed to fulfill the breadwinner role prompted him to rethink his understanding\n of African American manhood and deeply influenced his representation of the\n novel’s black male characters. The novel aims to disarticulate black\n masculinity from patriarchy. Jenkins’s misunderstanding of this aspect of\n the novel surfaces in his treatment of the character of Frank, who in the novel\n serves as an example of the destructiveness of patriarchal masculinity, and in\n his rewriting of the novel’s ending.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Romancing Beale Street\",\"authors\":\"R. J. Corber\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/jbr.5.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author reviews Barry Jenkins’s 2018 film adaptation of\\n Baldwin’s novel, If Beale Street Could Talk, finding\\n that Jenkins’s lush, painterly, and dreamlike visual style successfully\\n translates Baldwin’s cadenced prose into cinematic language. But in\\n interpreting the novel as the “perfect fusion” of the anger of\\n Baldwin’s essays and the sensuality of his fiction, Jenkins overlooks the\\n novel’s most significant aspect, its gender politics. Baldwin began\\n working on If Beale Street Could Talk shortly after being\\n interviewed by Black Arts poet Nikki Giovanni for the PBS television show,\\n Soul!. Giovanni’s rejection of Baldwin’s\\n claims that for black men to overcome the injuries of white supremacy they\\n needed to fulfill the breadwinner role prompted him to rethink his understanding\\n of African American manhood and deeply influenced his representation of the\\n novel’s black male characters. The novel aims to disarticulate black\\n masculinity from patriarchy. Jenkins’s misunderstanding of this aspect of\\n the novel surfaces in his treatment of the character of Frank, who in the novel\\n serves as an example of the destructiveness of patriarchal masculinity, and in\\n his rewriting of the novel’s ending.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
The author reviews Barry Jenkins’s 2018 film adaptation of
Baldwin’s novel, If Beale Street Could Talk, finding
that Jenkins’s lush, painterly, and dreamlike visual style successfully
translates Baldwin’s cadenced prose into cinematic language. But in
interpreting the novel as the “perfect fusion” of the anger of
Baldwin’s essays and the sensuality of his fiction, Jenkins overlooks the
novel’s most significant aspect, its gender politics. Baldwin began
working on If Beale Street Could Talk shortly after being
interviewed by Black Arts poet Nikki Giovanni for the PBS television show,
Soul!. Giovanni’s rejection of Baldwin’s
claims that for black men to overcome the injuries of white supremacy they
needed to fulfill the breadwinner role prompted him to rethink his understanding
of African American manhood and deeply influenced his representation of the
novel’s black male characters. The novel aims to disarticulate black
masculinity from patriarchy. Jenkins’s misunderstanding of this aspect of
the novel surfaces in his treatment of the character of Frank, who in the novel
serves as an example of the destructiveness of patriarchal masculinity, and in
his rewriting of the novel’s ending.