欧洲BIPOC女权主义

IF 0.2 Q4 WOMENS STUDIES
Nana Osei-Kofi, S. Tate
{"title":"欧洲BIPOC女权主义","authors":"Nana Osei-Kofi, S. Tate","doi":"10.1215/15366936-10220447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship and activism that center Black feminist thought, Women-ofColor feminisms, Indigenous feminisms, and Queer of Color critiques are not new in the European context. However, they are often overshadowed by white European feminist and queer theorization and political action on the one hand, and U.S.-centric scholarship and activism on the other. In one of the few edited volumes to take up Black feminism from a European perspective, Akwugo Emejulu and Francesca Sobande (2019: 5) note that “too often, when we think of Black feminist theory and activism, we look to the particular Black American experience and seek to universalize and apply it to Europe [,] . . . [a] dynamic . . . [that among other things] erase[s] . . . long histories of anti-imperialist struggles of Black feminists located across various European empires.”As coeditors of this special issue on BIPOC Europe, we feel strongly that the reality of Black feminist struggles that Emejulu and Sobande highlight, which is a reality that unequivocally extends to European BIPOC struggles as a whole, calls on us to remember that coloniality textures the current scholarly and activist landscape. These struggles have a history across European empires thatmust be acknowledged as critical to existing genealogies of Black, Women-ofColor, and Indigenous feminist epistemologies and praxes. As Black European scholars who live and work in Turtle Island, we recognize that we are situated on a site of continuing Indigenous dispossession and anti-Blackness (King 2019). From our location in North American institutions of higher education, we are keenly aware of the ways in which","PeriodicalId":54178,"journal":{"name":"Meridians-Feminism Race Transnationalism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European BIPOC Feminisms\",\"authors\":\"Nana Osei-Kofi, S. Tate\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/15366936-10220447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholarship and activism that center Black feminist thought, Women-ofColor feminisms, Indigenous feminisms, and Queer of Color critiques are not new in the European context. However, they are often overshadowed by white European feminist and queer theorization and political action on the one hand, and U.S.-centric scholarship and activism on the other. In one of the few edited volumes to take up Black feminism from a European perspective, Akwugo Emejulu and Francesca Sobande (2019: 5) note that “too often, when we think of Black feminist theory and activism, we look to the particular Black American experience and seek to universalize and apply it to Europe [,] . . . [a] dynamic . . . [that among other things] erase[s] . . . long histories of anti-imperialist struggles of Black feminists located across various European empires.”As coeditors of this special issue on BIPOC Europe, we feel strongly that the reality of Black feminist struggles that Emejulu and Sobande highlight, which is a reality that unequivocally extends to European BIPOC struggles as a whole, calls on us to remember that coloniality textures the current scholarly and activist landscape. These struggles have a history across European empires thatmust be acknowledged as critical to existing genealogies of Black, Women-ofColor, and Indigenous feminist epistemologies and praxes. As Black European scholars who live and work in Turtle Island, we recognize that we are situated on a site of continuing Indigenous dispossession and anti-Blackness (King 2019). From our location in North American institutions of higher education, we are keenly aware of the ways in which\",\"PeriodicalId\":54178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meridians-Feminism Race Transnationalism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meridians-Feminism Race Transnationalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/15366936-10220447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meridians-Feminism Race Transnationalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/15366936-10220447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以黑人女权主义思想、有色人种女性主义、土著女性主义和有色人种酷儿批评为中心的学术和激进主义在欧洲背景下并不新鲜。然而,一方面,他们往往被欧洲白人女权主义和酷儿理论和政治行动所掩盖,另一方面,被以美国为中心的学术和激进主义所掩盖。在为数不多的从欧洲角度探讨黑人女权主义的编辑卷中,Akwugo Emejulu和Francesca Sobande(2019:5)指出,“当我们想到黑人女权主义理论和激进主义时,我们往往会关注美国黑人的特殊经历,并寻求将其普遍化并应用于欧洲[,]…[一种]动态…[除其他外]抹去了黑人女权主义者在各个欧洲帝国的反帝国主义斗争的悠久历史。“作为这期关于BIPOC欧洲特刊的合著者,我们强烈认为,Emejulu和Sobande强调的黑人女权主义斗争的现实,这一现实明确延伸到整个欧洲BIPOC的斗争,呼吁我们记住,殖民主义塑造了当前的学术和活动家格局。这些斗争在整个欧洲帝国都有着悠久的历史,必须承认这对现有的黑人、有色人种女性和土著女权主义认识论和实践至关重要。作为在海龟岛生活和工作的欧洲黑人学者,我们认识到,我们正处于一个持续剥夺土著权利和反黑人的地方(King 2019)。从我们在北美高等教育机构的位置来看,我们敏锐地意识到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European BIPOC Feminisms
Scholarship and activism that center Black feminist thought, Women-ofColor feminisms, Indigenous feminisms, and Queer of Color critiques are not new in the European context. However, they are often overshadowed by white European feminist and queer theorization and political action on the one hand, and U.S.-centric scholarship and activism on the other. In one of the few edited volumes to take up Black feminism from a European perspective, Akwugo Emejulu and Francesca Sobande (2019: 5) note that “too often, when we think of Black feminist theory and activism, we look to the particular Black American experience and seek to universalize and apply it to Europe [,] . . . [a] dynamic . . . [that among other things] erase[s] . . . long histories of anti-imperialist struggles of Black feminists located across various European empires.”As coeditors of this special issue on BIPOC Europe, we feel strongly that the reality of Black feminist struggles that Emejulu and Sobande highlight, which is a reality that unequivocally extends to European BIPOC struggles as a whole, calls on us to remember that coloniality textures the current scholarly and activist landscape. These struggles have a history across European empires thatmust be acknowledged as critical to existing genealogies of Black, Women-ofColor, and Indigenous feminist epistemologies and praxes. As Black European scholars who live and work in Turtle Island, we recognize that we are situated on a site of continuing Indigenous dispossession and anti-Blackness (King 2019). From our location in North American institutions of higher education, we are keenly aware of the ways in which
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信