使用简单的技术分析指标指导资产配置决策

Bryan Foltice, Steven D. Dolvin
{"title":"使用简单的技术分析指标指导资产配置决策","authors":"Bryan Foltice, Steven D. Dolvin","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2021.1.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the effectiveness of using a simple technical analysis indicator to dynamically guide asset allocation decisions. Using the 200-day simple moving average of the S&P 500 as our technical indicator, the authors employ two separate strategies. They adopt a risk-on asset allocation strategy (larger stock allocation) when the daily price of the S&P 500 is above the indicator line, and a risk-off strategy (reduced stock/increased bond allocation) when below. In contrast to prior research, when transitioning to risk-off, they do not necessarily liquidate all equity, but rather consider other less extreme allocations. Over the 1962–2020 time period, they find that following various risk-on/risk-off rules generates excess annual returns of up to 0.58%, after factoring in a marginal trading cost. Furthermore, this strategy also provides a reduction in overall risk for an overwhelming majority of the analyzed allocation combinations. Taken together, almost all 200-day technically based strategies post an increase in Sharpe ratios relative to their respective baseline buy-and-hold strategies. Key Findings ▪ Using the 200-day simple moving average as our indicator line, all of the risk-on/risk-off approaches outperform (i.e., have a higher Sharpe ratio) the respective buy-and-hold strategy. In both analyzed samples, the vast majority of approaches post higher Sharpe ratios compared to the buy-and-hold strategies. ▪ Across the various starting allocations, metrics generally improve (i.e., higher return and lower risk) as a more extreme move to a conservative risk-off approach is employed. ▪ We find that this trading strategy is most effective when the stock market posts negative returns. Conversely, in bull markets, the moving-average strategy generally lags the stock market returns.","PeriodicalId":39998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wealth Management","volume":"24 1","pages":"31 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a Simple Technical Analysis Indicator to Guide Asset Allocation Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Foltice, Steven D. Dolvin\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jwm.2021.1.148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the effectiveness of using a simple technical analysis indicator to dynamically guide asset allocation decisions. Using the 200-day simple moving average of the S&P 500 as our technical indicator, the authors employ two separate strategies. They adopt a risk-on asset allocation strategy (larger stock allocation) when the daily price of the S&P 500 is above the indicator line, and a risk-off strategy (reduced stock/increased bond allocation) when below. In contrast to prior research, when transitioning to risk-off, they do not necessarily liquidate all equity, but rather consider other less extreme allocations. Over the 1962–2020 time period, they find that following various risk-on/risk-off rules generates excess annual returns of up to 0.58%, after factoring in a marginal trading cost. Furthermore, this strategy also provides a reduction in overall risk for an overwhelming majority of the analyzed allocation combinations. Taken together, almost all 200-day technically based strategies post an increase in Sharpe ratios relative to their respective baseline buy-and-hold strategies. Key Findings ▪ Using the 200-day simple moving average as our indicator line, all of the risk-on/risk-off approaches outperform (i.e., have a higher Sharpe ratio) the respective buy-and-hold strategy. In both analyzed samples, the vast majority of approaches post higher Sharpe ratios compared to the buy-and-hold strategies. ▪ Across the various starting allocations, metrics generally improve (i.e., higher return and lower risk) as a more extreme move to a conservative risk-off approach is employed. ▪ We find that this trading strategy is most effective when the stock market posts negative returns. Conversely, in bull markets, the moving-average strategy generally lags the stock market returns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wealth Management\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wealth Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2021.1.148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wealth Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2021.1.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了使用一个简单的技术分析指标来动态指导资产配置决策的有效性。使用标准普尔500指数的200天简单移动平均线作为我们的技术指标,作者采用了两种不同的策略。当标准普尔500指数的日价格高于指标线时,他们采取资产风险配置策略(更大的股票配置),当低于指标线时采取风险回避策略(减少股票/增加债券配置)。与之前的研究相反,当过渡到风险规避时,他们不一定会清算所有股票,而是考虑其他不那么极端的配置。在1962-2020年期间,他们发现,在考虑边际交易成本后,遵循各种风险开/关规则会产生高达0.58%的超额年回报。此外,该策略还降低了绝大多数分析的分配组合的总体风险。综合来看,几乎所有基于200天技术的策略都显示,相对于各自的基准买入和持有策略,夏普比率有所上升。关键发现▪ 使用200天简单移动平均线作为我们的指标线,所有风险开启/风险关闭方法都优于各自的买入和持有策略(即夏普比率更高)。在这两个分析样本中,与买入和持有策略相比,绝大多数方法的夏普比率都更高。▪ 在各种初始分配中,随着采用更极端的保守风险规避方法,指标通常会有所改善(即更高的回报和更低的风险)。▪ 我们发现,当股市出现负回报时,这种交易策略最有效。相反,在牛市中,移动平均线策略通常滞后于股市回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a Simple Technical Analysis Indicator to Guide Asset Allocation Decisions
This article examines the effectiveness of using a simple technical analysis indicator to dynamically guide asset allocation decisions. Using the 200-day simple moving average of the S&P 500 as our technical indicator, the authors employ two separate strategies. They adopt a risk-on asset allocation strategy (larger stock allocation) when the daily price of the S&P 500 is above the indicator line, and a risk-off strategy (reduced stock/increased bond allocation) when below. In contrast to prior research, when transitioning to risk-off, they do not necessarily liquidate all equity, but rather consider other less extreme allocations. Over the 1962–2020 time period, they find that following various risk-on/risk-off rules generates excess annual returns of up to 0.58%, after factoring in a marginal trading cost. Furthermore, this strategy also provides a reduction in overall risk for an overwhelming majority of the analyzed allocation combinations. Taken together, almost all 200-day technically based strategies post an increase in Sharpe ratios relative to their respective baseline buy-and-hold strategies. Key Findings ▪ Using the 200-day simple moving average as our indicator line, all of the risk-on/risk-off approaches outperform (i.e., have a higher Sharpe ratio) the respective buy-and-hold strategy. In both analyzed samples, the vast majority of approaches post higher Sharpe ratios compared to the buy-and-hold strategies. ▪ Across the various starting allocations, metrics generally improve (i.e., higher return and lower risk) as a more extreme move to a conservative risk-off approach is employed. ▪ We find that this trading strategy is most effective when the stock market posts negative returns. Conversely, in bull markets, the moving-average strategy generally lags the stock market returns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wealth Management
Journal of Wealth Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书