从Swadesh注释表的数据看伊朗语言中帕拉奇语和奥穆里语的地位

Q2 Arts and Humanities
A. Trofimov
{"title":"从Swadesh注释表的数据看伊朗语言中帕拉奇语和奥穆里语的地位","authors":"A. Trofimov","doi":"10.31826/jlr-2019-163-411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I discuss the open issue of the phylogenetic position of Parachi and Ormuri among other Iranian languages. Based on data from freshly constructed annotated 110-item Swadesh lists of Parachi and Ormuri compared with the same list as tentatively reconstructed for the Proto-Iranian stage (including additional synonyms with Western or Eastern areal distribution), I conclude that Parachi and Ormuri more probably align with the Eastern Iranian branch of languages. This is primarily concluded from the fact that Parachi and Ormuri show correlations with secondary synonyms of Eastern origin. It is important to note that phonetic isoglosses are not nearly as indicative, since Parachi and Ormuri show both Western and Eastern peculiarities; however, the prosodic systems of these languages are strongly reminiscent of the one attested in Pashto and preserving the Proto-(Indo)-Iranian system better than any other Iranian language. These conclusions support Morgenstierne’s original opinion on the Eastern character of Parachi and Ormuri; on the other hand, Morgenstierne's assumption of the existence of a separate Southeastern Iranian group requires additional confirmation.","PeriodicalId":52215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Relationship","volume":"16 1","pages":"277 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the place of Parachi and Ormuri among the Iranian languages according to the data of annotated Swadesh lists\",\"authors\":\"A. Trofimov\",\"doi\":\"10.31826/jlr-2019-163-411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I discuss the open issue of the phylogenetic position of Parachi and Ormuri among other Iranian languages. Based on data from freshly constructed annotated 110-item Swadesh lists of Parachi and Ormuri compared with the same list as tentatively reconstructed for the Proto-Iranian stage (including additional synonyms with Western or Eastern areal distribution), I conclude that Parachi and Ormuri more probably align with the Eastern Iranian branch of languages. This is primarily concluded from the fact that Parachi and Ormuri show correlations with secondary synonyms of Eastern origin. It is important to note that phonetic isoglosses are not nearly as indicative, since Parachi and Ormuri show both Western and Eastern peculiarities; however, the prosodic systems of these languages are strongly reminiscent of the one attested in Pashto and preserving the Proto-(Indo)-Iranian system better than any other Iranian language. These conclusions support Morgenstierne’s original opinion on the Eastern character of Parachi and Ormuri; on the other hand, Morgenstierne's assumption of the existence of a separate Southeastern Iranian group requires additional confirmation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Relationship\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"277 - 292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Relationship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2019-163-411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Relationship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2019-163-411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我讨论了帕拉奇语和奥穆里语在其他伊朗语言中的系统发育地位这一悬而未决的问题。根据新构建的有注释的110项帕拉奇语和奥穆里语Swadesh列表的数据,与为原伊朗阶段初步重建的相同列表(包括具有西部或东部区域分布的其他同义词)进行比较,我得出结论,帕拉奇语或奥穆里更可能与伊朗东部语言分支一致。这主要是因为Parachi和Ormuri与源自东方的次要同义词存在相关性。需要注意的是,语音同音词几乎没有指示性,因为Parachi和Ormuri同时表现出西方和东方的特点;然而,这些语言的韵律系统强烈地让人想起普什图语中证明的韵律系统,并比任何其他伊朗语言更好地保留了原始(印度)-伊朗系统。这些结论支持了Morgenstierne关于Parachi和Ormuri东方性格的独到见解;另一方面,Morgenstierne关于存在一个独立的伊朗东南部集团的假设需要进一步的证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the place of Parachi and Ormuri among the Iranian languages according to the data of annotated Swadesh lists
In this paper, I discuss the open issue of the phylogenetic position of Parachi and Ormuri among other Iranian languages. Based on data from freshly constructed annotated 110-item Swadesh lists of Parachi and Ormuri compared with the same list as tentatively reconstructed for the Proto-Iranian stage (including additional synonyms with Western or Eastern areal distribution), I conclude that Parachi and Ormuri more probably align with the Eastern Iranian branch of languages. This is primarily concluded from the fact that Parachi and Ormuri show correlations with secondary synonyms of Eastern origin. It is important to note that phonetic isoglosses are not nearly as indicative, since Parachi and Ormuri show both Western and Eastern peculiarities; however, the prosodic systems of these languages are strongly reminiscent of the one attested in Pashto and preserving the Proto-(Indo)-Iranian system better than any other Iranian language. These conclusions support Morgenstierne’s original opinion on the Eastern character of Parachi and Ormuri; on the other hand, Morgenstierne's assumption of the existence of a separate Southeastern Iranian group requires additional confirmation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language Relationship
Journal of Language Relationship Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信