驾驭对跨部门方法的批评：为全球社会正义和福祉回收跨部门性

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Women & Therapy Pub Date : 2020-03-27 DOI:10.1080/02703149.2020.1729477

Leah R. Warner, Tuğçe Kurtiş, Akanksha Adya

{"title":"驾驭对跨部门方法的批评：为全球社会正义和福祉回收跨部门性","authors":"Leah R. Warner, Tuğçe Kurtiş, Akanksha Adya","doi":"10.1080/02703149.2020.1729477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the use of intersectionality continues to increase in psychology, so do the critiques and extensions of it. Scholars and practitioners who want to integrate intersectionality need to navigate these critiques to maximize its effectiveness and minimize its potential pitfalls. We examine critiques and extensions of intersectionality, particularly as they apply to mental health theory and practice. We focus on two particular cases, namely assemblage theory and decolonial intersectionality, to discuss ways in which extensions of intersectionality can promote a broader, more inclusive model of intersectional social justice and well-being.","PeriodicalId":46696,"journal":{"name":"Women & Therapy","volume":"43 1","pages":"262 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729477","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Criticisms of Intersectional Approaches: Reclaiming Intersectionality for Global Social Justice and Well-Being\",\"authors\":\"Leah R. Warner, Tuğçe Kurtiş, Akanksha Adya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02703149.2020.1729477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As the use of intersectionality continues to increase in psychology, so do the critiques and extensions of it. Scholars and practitioners who want to integrate intersectionality need to navigate these critiques to maximize its effectiveness and minimize its potential pitfalls. We examine critiques and extensions of intersectionality, particularly as they apply to mental health theory and practice. We focus on two particular cases, namely assemblage theory and decolonial intersectionality, to discuss ways in which extensions of intersectionality can promote a broader, more inclusive model of intersectional social justice and well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"262 - 277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729477\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729477\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

摘要随着交叉性在心理学中的使用不断增加，对它的批评和扩展也在不断增加。想要整合交叉性的学者和从业者需要驾驭这些批评，以最大限度地提高其有效性，并最大限度地减少其潜在的陷阱。我们研究交叉性的批评和扩展，特别是当它们应用于心理健康理论和实践时。我们关注两个具体案例，即集合论和非殖民化交叉性，讨论交叉性的扩展如何促进更广泛、更具包容性的交叉社会正义和福祉模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Navigating Criticisms of Intersectional Approaches: Reclaiming Intersectionality for Global Social Justice and Well-Being

Abstract As the use of intersectionality continues to increase in psychology, so do the critiques and extensions of it. Scholars and practitioners who want to integrate intersectionality need to navigate these critiques to maximize its effectiveness and minimize its potential pitfalls. We examine critiques and extensions of intersectionality, particularly as they apply to mental health theory and practice. We focus on two particular cases, namely assemblage theory and decolonial intersectionality, to discuss ways in which extensions of intersectionality can promote a broader, more inclusive model of intersectional social justice and well-being.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Women & Therapy Multiple-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

4.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Women & Therapy is the only professional journal that focuses entirely on the complex interrelationship between women and the therapeutic experience. Devoted to descriptive, theoretical, clinical, and empirical perspectives on the topic of women and therapy, the journal is intended for feminist practitioners as well as for individuals interested in the practice of feminist therapy. The journal focuses on a wide range of content areas, including: •issues in the process of therapy with female clients •problems in living that affect women in greater proportion than men, such as depression, eating disorders, and agoraphobia •women"s traditional and nontraditional roles in society and how these affect and can be affected by therapy.