Wokeness和弱点：为什么穿着（合身）军装的女性会受到嘲笑

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Critical Military Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/23337486.2022.2096288

Sanna Strand

{"title":"Wokeness和弱点：为什么穿着（合身）军装的女性会受到嘲笑","authors":"Sanna Strand","doi":"10.1080/23337486.2022.2096288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite decades of military gender integration and women’s increasing presence in military ranks globally, military uniforms and equipment are still designed after the measurements of a ‘standard male body’ in many countries. Servicewomen are therefore – on a group level – less likely to be provided with fitting, functional, and safe military gear. So why is it taking so long to provide servicewomen with adequate uniforms and equipment? US right-wing TV host Tucker Carlson may inadvertently have provided one answer to such a question.","PeriodicalId":37527,"journal":{"name":"Critical Military Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"485 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wokeness and weakness: why women in (fitting) military uniforms are ridiculed\",\"authors\":\"Sanna Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337486.2022.2096288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite decades of military gender integration and women’s increasing presence in military ranks globally, military uniforms and equipment are still designed after the measurements of a ‘standard male body’ in many countries. Servicewomen are therefore – on a group level – less likely to be provided with fitting, functional, and safe military gear. So why is it taking so long to provide servicewomen with adequate uniforms and equipment? US right-wing TV host Tucker Carlson may inadvertently have provided one answer to such a question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Military Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"485 - 490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Military Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2022.2096288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2022.2096288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要尽管几十年来军队性别融合，女性在全球军队中的比例不断增加，但在许多国家，军装和装备的设计仍然是根据“标准男性身体”进行的。因此，在群体层面上，女军人不太可能获得合适、实用和安全的军事装备。那么，为什么要花这么长时间才能为女军人提供足够的制服和装备呢？美国右翼电视主持人塔克·卡尔森可能无意中为这样一个问题提供了一个答案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Wokeness and weakness: why women in (fitting) military uniforms are ridiculed

ABSTRACT Despite decades of military gender integration and women’s increasing presence in military ranks globally, military uniforms and equipment are still designed after the measurements of a ‘standard male body’ in many countries. Servicewomen are therefore – on a group level – less likely to be provided with fitting, functional, and safe military gear. So why is it taking so long to provide servicewomen with adequate uniforms and equipment? US right-wing TV host Tucker Carlson may inadvertently have provided one answer to such a question.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Military Studies Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Military Studies provides a rigorous, innovative platform for interdisciplinary debate on the operation of military power. It encourages the interrogation and destabilization of often taken-for-granted categories related to the military, militarism and militarization. It especially welcomes original thinking on contradictions and tensions central to the ways in which military institutions and military power work, how such tensions are reproduced within different societies and geopolitical arenas, and within and beyond academic discourse. Contributions on experiences of militarization among groups and individuals, and in hitherto underexplored, perhaps even seemingly ‘non-military’ settings are also encouraged. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. The Journal also includes a non-peer reviewed section, Encounters, showcasing multidisciplinary forms of critique such as film and photography, and engaging with policy debates and activism.