在机构和社区伙伴之间发展伦理研究实践:加拿大谅解备忘录相关文献的现状

IF 0.8 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Daniel Alcock, J. Elgie, Chantelle Richmond, J. White
{"title":"在机构和社区伙伴之间发展伦理研究实践:加拿大谅解备忘录相关文献的现状","authors":"Daniel Alcock, J. Elgie, Chantelle Richmond, J. White","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2017.8.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few institutionalized examples exist wherein Indigenous communities have participated in the co-development of ethics initiatives. This article explores one such process—the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). A MOU is a document created between institutional and community research partners to outline project guidelines. Based on Canadian MOUs developed between 1980 and 2016, this research has four objectives; (a) to describe current trends of MOU use and recognition in research; (b) to describe the challenges of collaborative research and how MOUs might mitigate them; (c) to understand if a standard MOU is feasible; and (d) to offer policy suggesting for implementing MOUs. Local MOUs mark a way for engaging in good research practices that actually benefit the involved community.","PeriodicalId":13707,"journal":{"name":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Ethical Research Practices Between Institutional and Community Partners: A Look at the Current Base of Literature Surrounding Memorandums of Understanding in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Alcock, J. Elgie, Chantelle Richmond, J. White\",\"doi\":\"10.18584/iipj.2017.8.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few institutionalized examples exist wherein Indigenous communities have participated in the co-development of ethics initiatives. This article explores one such process—the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). A MOU is a document created between institutional and community research partners to outline project guidelines. Based on Canadian MOUs developed between 1980 and 2016, this research has four objectives; (a) to describe current trends of MOU use and recognition in research; (b) to describe the challenges of collaborative research and how MOUs might mitigate them; (c) to understand if a standard MOU is feasible; and (d) to offer policy suggesting for implementing MOUs. Local MOUs mark a way for engaging in good research practices that actually benefit the involved community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Indigenous Policy Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Indigenous Policy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

很少有土著社区参与共同制定道德倡议的制度化例子。本文探讨了一个这样的过程——谅解备忘录(MOU)。谅解备忘录是机构和社区研究合作伙伴之间创建的一份文件,旨在概述项目指导方针。本研究基于1980年至2016年间开发的加拿大MOU,共有四个目标;(a) 描述研究中谅解备忘录使用和认可的当前趋势;(b) 描述合作研究的挑战以及谅解备忘录如何缓解这些挑战;(c) 了解标准谅解备忘录是否可行;以及(d)为执行谅解备忘录提供政策建议。地方MOU标志着参与良好研究实践的一种方式,这些实践实际上有利于相关社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing Ethical Research Practices Between Institutional and Community Partners: A Look at the Current Base of Literature Surrounding Memorandums of Understanding in Canada
Few institutionalized examples exist wherein Indigenous communities have participated in the co-development of ethics initiatives. This article explores one such process—the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). A MOU is a document created between institutional and community research partners to outline project guidelines. Based on Canadian MOUs developed between 1980 and 2016, this research has four objectives; (a) to describe current trends of MOU use and recognition in research; (b) to describe the challenges of collaborative research and how MOUs might mitigate them; (c) to understand if a standard MOU is feasible; and (d) to offer policy suggesting for implementing MOUs. Local MOUs mark a way for engaging in good research practices that actually benefit the involved community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信