神经损伤的多模式神经监测

Randy Reina-Rivero, M. Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Michael Gregorio Ortega Sierra, Diego Fernando Jamioy-Cabrera, Juan Felipe Villegas-Lora, Daniela Margoth Caycedo-Montiel, Juan David Balanta-Perea, Richard Adrian Vergara-Trujillo, Fernando Bellera, Y. Picón-Jaimes
{"title":"神经损伤的多模式神经监测","authors":"Randy Reina-Rivero, M. Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Michael Gregorio Ortega Sierra, Diego Fernando Jamioy-Cabrera, Juan Felipe Villegas-Lora, Daniela Margoth Caycedo-Montiel, Juan David Balanta-Perea, Richard Adrian Vergara-Trujillo, Fernando Bellera, Y. Picón-Jaimes","doi":"10.33962/roneuro-2021-091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multimodal neuromonitoring is used as an adjunct to clinical neurological examination, imaging and other diagnostic studies to obtain the most detailed information about the physiology of the brain. Neuromonitoring has been a standard of care for patients presenting with traumatic brain injury in most critical care centres for the past several years. Neuromonitoring is composed of multiple variables, which not only provides a better dynamic of the pathophysiology of the compromised brain but also how it might respond to the corresponding management procedures. Although the clinical neurological examination is the standard for monitoring the neurocritical patient, the results obtained in the latter may be insufficient or inconclusive to detect or prevent secondary brain injury. Therefore, multiple neuromonitoring tools have been developed to measure different physiological variables that can contribute to a better follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury. These variables include cerebral blood flow, cerebral electrical activity, cerebral metabolism, cerebral oxygenation and cerebral pressure. Thanks to monitoring as an adjuvant in critical care, it has been possible to avoid, identify and manage secondary brain injuries that commonly aggravate patients. This review aims to illustrate the main advantages and most recent recommendations regarding neuromonitoring based on the most current evidence.","PeriodicalId":30188,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal neurological monitoring in neurotrauma\",\"authors\":\"Randy Reina-Rivero, M. Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Michael Gregorio Ortega Sierra, Diego Fernando Jamioy-Cabrera, Juan Felipe Villegas-Lora, Daniela Margoth Caycedo-Montiel, Juan David Balanta-Perea, Richard Adrian Vergara-Trujillo, Fernando Bellera, Y. Picón-Jaimes\",\"doi\":\"10.33962/roneuro-2021-091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multimodal neuromonitoring is used as an adjunct to clinical neurological examination, imaging and other diagnostic studies to obtain the most detailed information about the physiology of the brain. Neuromonitoring has been a standard of care for patients presenting with traumatic brain injury in most critical care centres for the past several years. Neuromonitoring is composed of multiple variables, which not only provides a better dynamic of the pathophysiology of the compromised brain but also how it might respond to the corresponding management procedures. Although the clinical neurological examination is the standard for monitoring the neurocritical patient, the results obtained in the latter may be insufficient or inconclusive to detect or prevent secondary brain injury. Therefore, multiple neuromonitoring tools have been developed to measure different physiological variables that can contribute to a better follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury. These variables include cerebral blood flow, cerebral electrical activity, cerebral metabolism, cerebral oxygenation and cerebral pressure. Thanks to monitoring as an adjuvant in critical care, it has been possible to avoid, identify and manage secondary brain injuries that commonly aggravate patients. This review aims to illustrate the main advantages and most recent recommendations regarding neuromonitoring based on the most current evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33962/roneuro-2021-091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33962/roneuro-2021-091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多模式神经监测被用作临床神经检查、成像和其他诊断研究的辅助手段,以获得有关大脑生理学的最详细信息。在过去的几年里,神经监测一直是大多数重症监护中心对创伤性脑损伤患者的标准护理。神经监测由多个变量组成,不仅可以更好地了解受损大脑的病理生理学,还可以了解其对相应管理程序的反应。尽管临床神经系统检查是监测神经危重患者的标准,但后者的结果可能不足以或不确定,无法检测或预防继发性脑损伤。因此,已经开发了多种神经监测工具来测量不同的生理变量,这有助于更好地跟踪创伤性脑损伤患者。这些变量包括脑血流量、脑电活动、脑代谢、脑氧合和脑压力。由于监测作为重症监护的辅助手段,可以避免、识别和管理通常会加重患者的继发性脑损伤。这篇综述旨在说明基于最新证据的神经监测的主要优势和最新建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimodal neurological monitoring in neurotrauma
Multimodal neuromonitoring is used as an adjunct to clinical neurological examination, imaging and other diagnostic studies to obtain the most detailed information about the physiology of the brain. Neuromonitoring has been a standard of care for patients presenting with traumatic brain injury in most critical care centres for the past several years. Neuromonitoring is composed of multiple variables, which not only provides a better dynamic of the pathophysiology of the compromised brain but also how it might respond to the corresponding management procedures. Although the clinical neurological examination is the standard for monitoring the neurocritical patient, the results obtained in the latter may be insufficient or inconclusive to detect or prevent secondary brain injury. Therefore, multiple neuromonitoring tools have been developed to measure different physiological variables that can contribute to a better follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury. These variables include cerebral blood flow, cerebral electrical activity, cerebral metabolism, cerebral oxygenation and cerebral pressure. Thanks to monitoring as an adjuvant in critical care, it has been possible to avoid, identify and manage secondary brain injuries that commonly aggravate patients. This review aims to illustrate the main advantages and most recent recommendations regarding neuromonitoring based on the most current evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信