大国竞争如何塑造以东盟为中心的多边主义:演变与前景

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

East Asian Policy Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1142/s1793930522000265

Takeshi Yuzawa

{"title":"大国竞争如何塑造以东盟为中心的多边主义:演变与前景","authors":"Takeshi Yuzawa","doi":"10.1142/s1793930522000265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While historically providing ASEAN with both normative and strategic justifications for initiating “inclusive” multilateralism in the wider Asian region, great power rivalry has also functioned as a major impediment to the progress of ASEAN-led institutions beyond “dialogue” forums. In the age of fierce great power rivalry, these institutional properties have inevitably made ASEAN-led institutions become major fora for the “soft balancing” games of the great powers.","PeriodicalId":41995,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Great Power Rivalry Shapes ASEAN-centric Multilateralism: Evolution and Prospects\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Yuzawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s1793930522000265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While historically providing ASEAN with both normative and strategic justifications for initiating “inclusive” multilateralism in the wider Asian region, great power rivalry has also functioned as a major impediment to the progress of ASEAN-led institutions beyond “dialogue” forums. In the age of fierce great power rivalry, these institutional properties have inevitably made ASEAN-led institutions become major fora for the “soft balancing” games of the great powers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793930522000265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793930522000265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管历史上为东盟在更广泛的亚洲地区发起“包容性”多边主义提供了规范和战略依据，但大国竞争也成为东盟领导的机构在“对话”论坛之外取得进展的主要障碍。在大国竞争激烈的时代，这些制度属性不可避免地使东盟领导的机构成为大国“软平衡”游戏的主要论坛。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Great Power Rivalry Shapes ASEAN-centric Multilateralism: Evolution and Prospects

While historically providing ASEAN with both normative and strategic justifications for initiating “inclusive” multilateralism in the wider Asian region, great power rivalry has also functioned as a major impediment to the progress of ASEAN-led institutions beyond “dialogue” forums. In the age of fierce great power rivalry, these institutional properties have inevitably made ASEAN-led institutions become major fora for the “soft balancing” games of the great powers.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

East Asian Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

自引率

11.10%

发文量