英语的兴起。作者:Susan Oosthuizen。过去的不完美。180毫米。第viii页+140.7图。ARC人文出版社,利兹,2019年。是9781641891271。16.95英镑(pbk)。

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Hines
{"title":"英语的兴起。作者:Susan Oosthuizen。过去的不完美。180毫米。第viii页+140.7图。ARC人文出版社,利兹,2019年。是9781641891271。16.95英镑(pbk)。","authors":"J. Hines","doi":"10.1017/S0003581520000359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"sections, themselves split into subsections. The main sections are: the Invasion of Britain in AD  and subsequent military operations (sections –); Hadrian’s Wall and the Antonine Wall (sections –); the later second and early third centuries (sections –); such topics as soldier and civilian, administration, the economy and religion (sections –) –which together cover approximately half the entries – and the final two sections ( and ), which return to the historical order and cover the third and fourth centuries. Items selected by Tomlin for inclusion are designated by main section number, and then numerically, so ‘.’ as quoted below means the nineteenth text in section , a system that is simple and works well. One difficulty that Tomlin faced will have been to decide into which section to put some of the items – thus the famous writing tablet from Vindolanda (.) written by Claudia Severa, the wife of the commanding officer, to Sulpicia Lepidina, the wife of a fellow officer, is given in a sub section on Vindolanda in main section  – an early chronological section preceding the section devoted to Hadrian’s Wall – whereas it would have been tempting to put it in section  (Soldier and Civilian in the subsection entitled ’equestrian officers and their families’). There is only one case where this reviewer disagrees with Tomlin’s interpretation and that is the inscription round the mouth of the Ilam Staffordshire cup (.), and Tomlin’s taking the name Aelii with Valli – ‘the Wall of Aelius’, ie of Hadrian, while it almost certainly goes with Draconis ‘(the property) of Aelius Draco’. For this name, possibly the same man, see Henzen et al (, ,), Rome T Aelius Aug. lib Draco. Of course any second edition of Britannia Romana would also include inscriptions found after Tomlin’s closing date of , such as the inscription from Dorchester (Tomlin ), the tombstone of a veteran of Legion II Augusta comparable to the tombstone of the Veteran of the same legion from Alchester, Oxon (.), and, like that, useful in tracing the changing location of the legion in the first years of the Roman occupation. In conclusion it is often said that there are too many books on Roman Britain and readers – and possibly reviewers! – may well agree. However, if this statement is limited to books based on the historical or epigraphic source or one confined to the historical sources themselves, this is certainly not true; and it is hard to conceive of any other writer who would have the knowledge to produce a work like Britannia Romana or one who would have had the ability to have read texts like the Bloomberg documents or lead curse tablets from Bath or Uley in the first place.","PeriodicalId":44308,"journal":{"name":"Antiquaries Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0003581520000359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Emergence of the English. By Susan Oosthuizen. Past Imperfect. 180mm. Pp viii + 140, 7 figs. ARC Humanities Press, Leeds, 2019. isbn 9781641891271. £16.95 (pbk).\",\"authors\":\"J. Hines\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0003581520000359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"sections, themselves split into subsections. The main sections are: the Invasion of Britain in AD  and subsequent military operations (sections –); Hadrian’s Wall and the Antonine Wall (sections –); the later second and early third centuries (sections –); such topics as soldier and civilian, administration, the economy and religion (sections –) –which together cover approximately half the entries – and the final two sections ( and ), which return to the historical order and cover the third and fourth centuries. Items selected by Tomlin for inclusion are designated by main section number, and then numerically, so ‘.’ as quoted below means the nineteenth text in section , a system that is simple and works well. One difficulty that Tomlin faced will have been to decide into which section to put some of the items – thus the famous writing tablet from Vindolanda (.) written by Claudia Severa, the wife of the commanding officer, to Sulpicia Lepidina, the wife of a fellow officer, is given in a sub section on Vindolanda in main section  – an early chronological section preceding the section devoted to Hadrian’s Wall – whereas it would have been tempting to put it in section  (Soldier and Civilian in the subsection entitled ’equestrian officers and their families’). There is only one case where this reviewer disagrees with Tomlin’s interpretation and that is the inscription round the mouth of the Ilam Staffordshire cup (.), and Tomlin’s taking the name Aelii with Valli – ‘the Wall of Aelius’, ie of Hadrian, while it almost certainly goes with Draconis ‘(the property) of Aelius Draco’. For this name, possibly the same man, see Henzen et al (, ,), Rome T Aelius Aug. lib Draco. Of course any second edition of Britannia Romana would also include inscriptions found after Tomlin’s closing date of , such as the inscription from Dorchester (Tomlin ), the tombstone of a veteran of Legion II Augusta comparable to the tombstone of the Veteran of the same legion from Alchester, Oxon (.), and, like that, useful in tracing the changing location of the legion in the first years of the Roman occupation. In conclusion it is often said that there are too many books on Roman Britain and readers – and possibly reviewers! – may well agree. However, if this statement is limited to books based on the historical or epigraphic source or one confined to the historical sources themselves, this is certainly not true; and it is hard to conceive of any other writer who would have the knowledge to produce a work like Britannia Romana or one who would have had the ability to have read texts like the Bloomberg documents or lead curse tablets from Bath or Uley in the first place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0003581520000359\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581520000359\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquaries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581520000359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

部分,它们本身被划分为子部分。主要章节有:公元入侵英国 以及随后的军事行动(章节–); 哈德良长城和安东尼长城(剖面图–); 第二世纪末和第三世纪初(章节–); 诸如士兵和平民、行政、经济和宗教等主题(章节–) –它们总共涵盖了大约一半的条目——以及最后两个部分( 和), 它们回到了历史秩序,涵盖了三世纪和四世纪。汤姆林选择纳入的项目由主要章节编号指定,然后用数字表示,因此.’ 以下引用的内容是指第十九节中的文本, 一个简单且运行良好的系统。汤姆林面临的一个困难是决定将一些物品放在哪个部分——因此是文多兰达著名的写字板(.) 指挥官的妻子Claudia Severa写给一位同事的妻子Sulpicia Lepidina的信,在主节关于Vindolanda的小节中给出 – 哈德良长城之前的早期时间段,而把它放在一段中会很诱人 (题为“马术军官及其家属”的小节中的士兵和平民)。只有一种情况下,这位评论家不同意汤姆林的解释,那就是Ilam Staffordshire杯口周围的铭文(.), 汤姆林用瓦利取了一个名字——“阿留斯之墙”,即哈德良之墙,而它几乎可以肯定地与德拉科尼斯(阿留斯-德拉科的财产)一致。关于这个名字,可能是同一个人,参见Henzen等人(, ,), 罗马T Aelius Augus lib Draco。当然,任何第二版的《不列颠罗马书》也会包括汤姆林于, 例如多切斯特的铭文(汤姆林), 奥古斯塔第二军团老兵的墓碑,可与来自奥克森阿尔切斯特的同一军团老兵的石碑相媲美(.), 而且,像这样,有助于追踪罗马占领最初几年军团的位置变化。总之,人们常说关于罗马不列颠的书太多了,读者——可能还有评论家!——很可能同意。然而,如果这种说法仅限于基于历史或金石来源的书籍,或者仅限于历史来源本身的书籍,那么这肯定不是真的;很难想象还有哪个作家会有知识创作出像《不列颠尼亚·罗曼娜》这样的作品,或者有能力阅读彭博社的文件或巴斯或乌利的铅诅咒石碑等文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Emergence of the English. By Susan Oosthuizen. Past Imperfect. 180mm. Pp viii + 140, 7 figs. ARC Humanities Press, Leeds, 2019. isbn 9781641891271. £16.95 (pbk).
sections, themselves split into subsections. The main sections are: the Invasion of Britain in AD  and subsequent military operations (sections –); Hadrian’s Wall and the Antonine Wall (sections –); the later second and early third centuries (sections –); such topics as soldier and civilian, administration, the economy and religion (sections –) –which together cover approximately half the entries – and the final two sections ( and ), which return to the historical order and cover the third and fourth centuries. Items selected by Tomlin for inclusion are designated by main section number, and then numerically, so ‘.’ as quoted below means the nineteenth text in section , a system that is simple and works well. One difficulty that Tomlin faced will have been to decide into which section to put some of the items – thus the famous writing tablet from Vindolanda (.) written by Claudia Severa, the wife of the commanding officer, to Sulpicia Lepidina, the wife of a fellow officer, is given in a sub section on Vindolanda in main section  – an early chronological section preceding the section devoted to Hadrian’s Wall – whereas it would have been tempting to put it in section  (Soldier and Civilian in the subsection entitled ’equestrian officers and their families’). There is only one case where this reviewer disagrees with Tomlin’s interpretation and that is the inscription round the mouth of the Ilam Staffordshire cup (.), and Tomlin’s taking the name Aelii with Valli – ‘the Wall of Aelius’, ie of Hadrian, while it almost certainly goes with Draconis ‘(the property) of Aelius Draco’. For this name, possibly the same man, see Henzen et al (, ,), Rome T Aelius Aug. lib Draco. Of course any second edition of Britannia Romana would also include inscriptions found after Tomlin’s closing date of , such as the inscription from Dorchester (Tomlin ), the tombstone of a veteran of Legion II Augusta comparable to the tombstone of the Veteran of the same legion from Alchester, Oxon (.), and, like that, useful in tracing the changing location of the legion in the first years of the Roman occupation. In conclusion it is often said that there are too many books on Roman Britain and readers – and possibly reviewers! – may well agree. However, if this statement is limited to books based on the historical or epigraphic source or one confined to the historical sources themselves, this is certainly not true; and it is hard to conceive of any other writer who would have the knowledge to produce a work like Britannia Romana or one who would have had the ability to have read texts like the Bloomberg documents or lead curse tablets from Bath or Uley in the first place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antiquaries Journal
Antiquaries Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信