高加索人群Gln223Arg多态性和中国人群Pro1019Pro多态性是OSAS的危险因素:一项1159名受试者的最新荟萃分析

B. Xu , J. Liu , T. Li , S. Liu
{"title":"高加索人群Gln223Arg多态性和中国人群Pro1019Pro多态性是OSAS的危险因素:一项1159名受试者的最新荟萃分析","authors":"B. Xu ,&nbsp;J. Liu ,&nbsp;T. Li ,&nbsp;S. Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.rppnen.2016.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We conducted a meta-analysis of published literature to identify the correlation between leptin receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were studied. Only Gln223Arg and Pro1019Pro had multiple studies. Nine studies focused on the correlation between Gln223Arg and Pro1019Pro polymorphisms and OSAS risk. Fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (ORs) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The Begg's, Egger's, Perter's and Harbord tests were used to measure publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to ensure the robustness of the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies on Gln223Arg polymorphisms (661 cases and 498 controls) and three studies on Pro1019Pro polymorphisms (561 cases and 561 controls) were extracted. There was no correlation between the leptin receptor Gln223Arg polymorphism and the risk of OSAS (odd ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.86, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.68–1.10, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.23). However, Caucasian OSAS patients had a higher Arg allele frequency; whereas Chinese population with G genotype were more susceptible to OSAS (odd ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.28, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.04–1.57, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) in the studies on Pro1019Pro polymorphisms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Gln223Arg polymorphisms in the Caucasian population and the Pro1019Pro polymorphisms in the Chinese population are risk factors for OSAS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101122,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppnen.2016.12.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gln223Arg polymorphism in the Caucasian population and Pro1019Pro polymorphism in the Chinese population are risk factors for OSAS: An updated meta-analysis of 1159 subjects\",\"authors\":\"B. Xu ,&nbsp;J. Liu ,&nbsp;T. Li ,&nbsp;S. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rppnen.2016.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We conducted a meta-analysis of published literature to identify the correlation between leptin receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were studied. Only Gln223Arg and Pro1019Pro had multiple studies. Nine studies focused on the correlation between Gln223Arg and Pro1019Pro polymorphisms and OSAS risk. Fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (ORs) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The Begg's, Egger's, Perter's and Harbord tests were used to measure publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to ensure the robustness of the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies on Gln223Arg polymorphisms (661 cases and 498 controls) and three studies on Pro1019Pro polymorphisms (561 cases and 561 controls) were extracted. There was no correlation between the leptin receptor Gln223Arg polymorphism and the risk of OSAS (odd ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.86, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.68–1.10, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.23). However, Caucasian OSAS patients had a higher Arg allele frequency; whereas Chinese population with G genotype were more susceptible to OSAS (odd ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.28, 95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.04–1.57, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) in the studies on Pro1019Pro polymorphisms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Gln223Arg polymorphisms in the Caucasian population and the Pro1019Pro polymorphisms in the Chinese population are risk factors for OSAS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppnen.2016.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173511517300027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173511517300027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们对已发表的文献进行了荟萃分析,以确定瘦素受体基因多态性与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)风险之间的相关性。方法对5种不同的单核苷酸多态性(snp)进行研究。只有Gln223Arg和Pro1019Pro有多次研究。9项研究关注Gln223Arg和Pro1019Pro多态性与OSAS风险的相关性。采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型计算合并优势比(ORs)及其相应的95%置信区间(95% CI)。Begg’s, Egger’s, peter’s和Harbord检验用于测量发表偏倚。还进行了敏感性分析,以确保结果的稳健性。结果共提取6篇Gln223Arg多态性研究(661例,对照498例)和3篇Pro1019Pro多态性研究(561例,对照561例)。瘦素受体Gln223Arg多态性与OSAS发病风险无相关性(奇比= 0.86,95% CI = 0.68 ~ 1.10, P = 0.23)。而白种人OSAS患者Arg等位基因频率较高;而中国G基因型人群在Pro1019Pro多态性研究中更容易发生OSAS(奇比= 1.28,95% CI = 1.04 ~ 1.57, P = 0.02)。结论白种人Gln223Arg基因多态性和中国人Pro1019Pro基因多态性是OSAS发生的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gln223Arg polymorphism in the Caucasian population and Pro1019Pro polymorphism in the Chinese population are risk factors for OSAS: An updated meta-analysis of 1159 subjects

Background

We conducted a meta-analysis of published literature to identify the correlation between leptin receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).

Methods

Five different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were studied. Only Gln223Arg and Pro1019Pro had multiple studies. Nine studies focused on the correlation between Gln223Arg and Pro1019Pro polymorphisms and OSAS risk. Fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (ORs) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The Begg's, Egger's, Perter's and Harbord tests were used to measure publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to ensure the robustness of the findings.

Results

Six studies on Gln223Arg polymorphisms (661 cases and 498 controls) and three studies on Pro1019Pro polymorphisms (561 cases and 561 controls) were extracted. There was no correlation between the leptin receptor Gln223Arg polymorphism and the risk of OSAS (odd ratio = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.68–1.10, P = 0.23). However, Caucasian OSAS patients had a higher Arg allele frequency; whereas Chinese population with G genotype were more susceptible to OSAS (odd ratio = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.04–1.57, P = 0.02) in the studies on Pro1019Pro polymorphisms.

Conclusion

The Gln223Arg polymorphisms in the Caucasian population and the Pro1019Pro polymorphisms in the Chinese population are risk factors for OSAS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信