基于混合聚合的集团战略优先决策——以泰国糖业为例

IF 0.3 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Mongkol Kittiyankajon, D. Chetchotsak
{"title":"基于混合聚合的集团战略优先决策——以泰国糖业为例","authors":"Mongkol Kittiyankajon, D. Chetchotsak","doi":"10.1504/IJAMS.2018.10015875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategy prioritisation with multiple criteria decision analysis is well accepted. When group decision making is concerned however, the process to aggregate each of the experts' decisions into the group decision is complicated and challenging. The traditional geometric mean method is very common for group decision but it might ignore variations among the experts' decisions. This paper proposed an aggregation algorithm for group decision to be used for strategy prioritisation which considered the following features: 1) agreement among the individuals' decisions; 2) influence of persons who had greater preferential difference; 3) the ranks of alternatives by each expert; 4) the group decision be closest to the best alternative but farthest from the worst one. Simulated situations, sensitivity analysis, and a case study for the sugar industry in Thailand were provided as numerical examples along with discussions of results. The proposed method can be applied for strategy prioritisation as well as other kinds of ranking problems.","PeriodicalId":38716,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group decision making for strategy prioritisation using hybrid aggregation: a case study of sugar industry in Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Mongkol Kittiyankajon, D. Chetchotsak\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJAMS.2018.10015875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Strategy prioritisation with multiple criteria decision analysis is well accepted. When group decision making is concerned however, the process to aggregate each of the experts' decisions into the group decision is complicated and challenging. The traditional geometric mean method is very common for group decision but it might ignore variations among the experts' decisions. This paper proposed an aggregation algorithm for group decision to be used for strategy prioritisation which considered the following features: 1) agreement among the individuals' decisions; 2) influence of persons who had greater preferential difference; 3) the ranks of alternatives by each expert; 4) the group decision be closest to the best alternative but farthest from the worst one. Simulated situations, sensitivity analysis, and a case study for the sugar industry in Thailand were provided as numerical examples along with discussions of results. The proposed method can be applied for strategy prioritisation as well as other kinds of ranking problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAMS.2018.10015875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAMS.2018.10015875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用多标准决策分析的战略优先级已被广泛接受。然而,当涉及到群体决策时,将每个专家的决策汇总为群体决策的过程是复杂而具有挑战性的。传统的几何平均法在群体决策中非常常见,但它可能会忽略专家决策之间的差异。本文提出了一种用于策略优先级排序的群体决策聚合算法,该算法考虑了以下特征:1)个体决策之间的一致性;2) 具有较大优惠差异的人的影响;3) 每个专家的备选方案排名;4) 群决策最接近最佳备选方案,但离最差备选方案最远。提供了泰国糖业的模拟情况、敏感性分析和案例研究作为数值示例,并对结果进行了讨论。所提出的方法可以应用于策略优先级以及其他类型的排序问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group decision making for strategy prioritisation using hybrid aggregation: a case study of sugar industry in Thailand
Strategy prioritisation with multiple criteria decision analysis is well accepted. When group decision making is concerned however, the process to aggregate each of the experts' decisions into the group decision is complicated and challenging. The traditional geometric mean method is very common for group decision but it might ignore variations among the experts' decisions. This paper proposed an aggregation algorithm for group decision to be used for strategy prioritisation which considered the following features: 1) agreement among the individuals' decisions; 2) influence of persons who had greater preferential difference; 3) the ranks of alternatives by each expert; 4) the group decision be closest to the best alternative but farthest from the worst one. Simulated situations, sensitivity analysis, and a case study for the sugar industry in Thailand were provided as numerical examples along with discussions of results. The proposed method can be applied for strategy prioritisation as well as other kinds of ranking problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Applied Management Science
International Journal of Applied Management Science Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信