乌云的一线希望?政策干预对新兴成熟科技企业在线招聘的影响

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
D. Lucas, C. Bellavitis, U. D. Park
{"title":"乌云的一线希望?政策干预对新兴成熟科技企业在线招聘的影响","authors":"D. Lucas, C. Bellavitis, U. D. Park","doi":"10.1002/sej.1454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research summary: We synthesize the external enablement (EE) framework with insights from labor economics and strategic human capital to theorize how restrictive policy interventions shape technology ventures' employee recruitment, attending to both sides of the hiring dyad. We engage in a quantitative study of over 220,000 recruiting interactions between technology ventures and candidates on a prominent digital networking platform surrounding the early COVID-19 pandemic policy responses. We find that firms' recruitment declined significantly while candidates' responsiveness increased during the early COVID-19 policy interventions. In turn, young technology ventures were enabled to hire more during the interventions, whereas maturing ventures were enabled to hire differently—acquiring candidates with greater entrepreneurial orientation. Our work extends the EE framework to human resource strategies and to heterogeneous enablement across firm age. Managerial summary: Hiring is a critical task for young and maturing venture firms, and environmental disruptions can impinge heavily on recruiting processes. We study how restrictive policy interventions shape technology ventures' employee recruitment. Examining over 220,000 recruiting interactions on a major digital platform before and during the early COVID-19 policy responses, we find that restrictive policy interventions alter the technology venture labor market, deterring some firms from recruiting while making others more successful in their continued hiring efforts. Furthermore, we discover that maturing firms are more adaptive than young firms in their selection of candidates during policy interventions—seeking employees with more entrepreneurial characteristics. © 2023 Strategic Management Society.","PeriodicalId":51417,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cloud's Silver Lining? The Impact of Policy Interventions on New and Maturing Technology Ventures’ Online Recruitment\",\"authors\":\"D. Lucas, C. Bellavitis, U. D. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sej.1454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research summary: We synthesize the external enablement (EE) framework with insights from labor economics and strategic human capital to theorize how restrictive policy interventions shape technology ventures' employee recruitment, attending to both sides of the hiring dyad. We engage in a quantitative study of over 220,000 recruiting interactions between technology ventures and candidates on a prominent digital networking platform surrounding the early COVID-19 pandemic policy responses. We find that firms' recruitment declined significantly while candidates' responsiveness increased during the early COVID-19 policy interventions. In turn, young technology ventures were enabled to hire more during the interventions, whereas maturing ventures were enabled to hire differently—acquiring candidates with greater entrepreneurial orientation. Our work extends the EE framework to human resource strategies and to heterogeneous enablement across firm age. Managerial summary: Hiring is a critical task for young and maturing venture firms, and environmental disruptions can impinge heavily on recruiting processes. We study how restrictive policy interventions shape technology ventures' employee recruitment. Examining over 220,000 recruiting interactions on a major digital platform before and during the early COVID-19 policy responses, we find that restrictive policy interventions alter the technology venture labor market, deterring some firms from recruiting while making others more successful in their continued hiring efforts. Furthermore, we discover that maturing firms are more adaptive than young firms in their selection of candidates during policy interventions—seeking employees with more entrepreneurial characteristics. © 2023 Strategic Management Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1454\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究摘要:我们将外部激励(EE)框架与劳动经济学和战略人力资本的见解相结合,以理论化限制性政策干预如何影响科技企业的员工招聘,同时兼顾招聘双方。我们围绕新冠肺炎疫情早期政策应对,在一个著名的数字网络平台上,对技术企业和候选人之间超过220000次招聘互动进行了定量研究。我们发现,在新冠肺炎早期政策干预期间,企业的招聘大幅下降,而候选人的反应能力有所提高。反过来,在干预期间,年轻的科技企业能够雇佣更多的人,而成熟的企业则能够以不同的方式雇佣——获得更具创业导向的候选人。我们的工作将EE框架扩展到人力资源战略和跨公司时代的异构启用。管理层总结:对于年轻和成熟的风险投资公司来说,招聘是一项关键任务,环境破坏可能会严重影响招聘过程。我们研究了限制性政策干预如何影响科技企业的员工招聘。在新冠肺炎早期政策应对之前和期间,我们研究了一个主要数字平台上超过220000次招聘互动,发现限制性政策干预改变了技术风险劳动力市场,阻止了一些公司招聘,同时使其他公司在持续招聘工作中更加成功。此外,我们发现,在政策干预期间,成熟的公司在选择候选人方面比年轻的公司更具适应性——寻找更具创业特征的员工。©2023战略管理学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cloud's Silver Lining? The Impact of Policy Interventions on New and Maturing Technology Ventures’ Online Recruitment
Research summary: We synthesize the external enablement (EE) framework with insights from labor economics and strategic human capital to theorize how restrictive policy interventions shape technology ventures' employee recruitment, attending to both sides of the hiring dyad. We engage in a quantitative study of over 220,000 recruiting interactions between technology ventures and candidates on a prominent digital networking platform surrounding the early COVID-19 pandemic policy responses. We find that firms' recruitment declined significantly while candidates' responsiveness increased during the early COVID-19 policy interventions. In turn, young technology ventures were enabled to hire more during the interventions, whereas maturing ventures were enabled to hire differently—acquiring candidates with greater entrepreneurial orientation. Our work extends the EE framework to human resource strategies and to heterogeneous enablement across firm age. Managerial summary: Hiring is a critical task for young and maturing venture firms, and environmental disruptions can impinge heavily on recruiting processes. We study how restrictive policy interventions shape technology ventures' employee recruitment. Examining over 220,000 recruiting interactions on a major digital platform before and during the early COVID-19 policy responses, we find that restrictive policy interventions alter the technology venture labor market, deterring some firms from recruiting while making others more successful in their continued hiring efforts. Furthermore, we discover that maturing firms are more adaptive than young firms in their selection of candidates during policy interventions—seeking employees with more entrepreneurial characteristics. © 2023 Strategic Management Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal is a research journal that publishes original work recommended by a developmental, double-blind review process conducted by peer scholars. Strategic entrepreneurship involves innovation and subsequent changes which add value to society and which change societal life in ways which have significant, sustainable, and durable consequences. The SEJ is international in scope and acknowledges theory- and evidence-based research conducted and/or applied in all regions of the world. It is devoted to content and quality standards based on scientific method, relevant theory, tested or testable propositions, and appropriate data and evidence, all replicable by others, and all representing original contributions. The SEJ values contributions which lead to improved practice of managing organizations as they deal with the entrepreneurial process involving imagination, insight, invention, and innovation and the inevitable changes and transformations that result and benefit society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信