通过邮寄调查确定老年退伍军人痴呆风险

IF 8.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aashaq Shah, O. Ysea-Hill, A. Torres-Morales, C. Gomez, A. Castellanos, J. Ruiz
{"title":"通过邮寄调查确定老年退伍军人痴呆风险","authors":"Aashaq Shah, O. Ysea-Hill, A. Torres-Morales, C. Gomez, A. Castellanos, J. Ruiz","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2022.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence suggests that dementia can be prevented. Patients with frailty may be particularly at risk for cognitive impairment (CI). The aim of this study was to determine dementia risk in older Veterans and whether the risk varies according to frailty status. We also evaluated the feasibility of mailed dementia risk screening. Participants were mailed a questionnaire and the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE). High dementia risk was defined as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on SAGE or a CAIDE score ≥6. Out of 5,432 mailed surveys, we obtained a response rate of 19.75%. Most responders completed the questionnaire items. We identified a total of 689 (75.9%) subjects to be at high risk for dementia. Individuals with frailty were at a greater risk for dementia when compared to robust individuals OR:1.921 (95%CI:1.259–2.930), p=.002. The mailed screening represents a convenient, alternative and scalable approach to screen for dementia risk.","PeriodicalId":48606,"journal":{"name":"Jpad-Journal of Prevention of Alzheimers Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Dementia Risk in Older Veterans Using A Mailing Survey\",\"authors\":\"Aashaq Shah, O. Ysea-Hill, A. Torres-Morales, C. Gomez, A. Castellanos, J. Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jpad.2022.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence suggests that dementia can be prevented. Patients with frailty may be particularly at risk for cognitive impairment (CI). The aim of this study was to determine dementia risk in older Veterans and whether the risk varies according to frailty status. We also evaluated the feasibility of mailed dementia risk screening. Participants were mailed a questionnaire and the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE). High dementia risk was defined as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on SAGE or a CAIDE score ≥6. Out of 5,432 mailed surveys, we obtained a response rate of 19.75%. Most responders completed the questionnaire items. We identified a total of 689 (75.9%) subjects to be at high risk for dementia. Individuals with frailty were at a greater risk for dementia when compared to robust individuals OR:1.921 (95%CI:1.259–2.930), p=.002. The mailed screening represents a convenient, alternative and scalable approach to screen for dementia risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jpad-Journal of Prevention of Alzheimers Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jpad-Journal of Prevention of Alzheimers Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.14\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jpad-Journal of Prevention of Alzheimers Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.14","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有证据表明,痴呆症是可以预防的。虚弱的患者可能特别容易发生认知障碍(CI)。这项研究的目的是确定老年退伍军人患痴呆症的风险,以及风险是否因虚弱状态而异。我们还评估了邮寄痴呆风险筛查的可行性。参与者被邮寄了一份问卷和自我管理的老年认知检查(SAGE)。高痴呆风险被定义为在SAGE上有轻度认知障碍(MCI)或CAIDE评分≥6。在5432份邮寄调查中,我们获得了19.75%的回复率。大多数回复者完成了问卷项目。我们共发现689名(75.9%)受试者有患痴呆症的高风险。与强壮的个体相比,虚弱的个体患痴呆症的风险更大,OR:1.921(95%CI:1.259-2.930),p=0.002。邮寄筛查代表了一种方便、替代和可扩展的痴呆风险筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Dementia Risk in Older Veterans Using A Mailing Survey
Evidence suggests that dementia can be prevented. Patients with frailty may be particularly at risk for cognitive impairment (CI). The aim of this study was to determine dementia risk in older Veterans and whether the risk varies according to frailty status. We also evaluated the feasibility of mailed dementia risk screening. Participants were mailed a questionnaire and the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE). High dementia risk was defined as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on SAGE or a CAIDE score ≥6. Out of 5,432 mailed surveys, we obtained a response rate of 19.75%. Most responders completed the questionnaire items. We identified a total of 689 (75.9%) subjects to be at high risk for dementia. Individuals with frailty were at a greater risk for dementia when compared to robust individuals OR:1.921 (95%CI:1.259–2.930), p=.002. The mailed screening represents a convenient, alternative and scalable approach to screen for dementia risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.80%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The JPAD « Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease » will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including : neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes. JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信