评估中学教育中历史思维的能力测试:设计、应用和验证

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY
Jesús Domínguez-Castillo, Laura Arias-Ferrer, Raquel Sánchez-Ibáñez, Alejandro Egea-Vivancos, Francisco J García-Crespo, Pedro Miralles-Martínez
{"title":"评估中学教育中历史思维的能力测试:设计、应用和验证","authors":"Jesús Domínguez-Castillo, Laura Arias-Ferrer, Raquel Sánchez-Ibáñez, Alejandro Egea-Vivancos, Francisco J García-Crespo, Pedro Miralles-Martínez","doi":"10.52289/HEJ8.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the theoretical framework, application and final outcomes of a pilot test designed as a possible model for assessing students' historical thinking in Secondary Education. It is based both on widely accepted historical thinking concepts and on the assessment framework developed by PISA. The test tries to assess what could be named as the three major competences in history: \"explain historically\", \"use of sources as historical evidence\" and \"understanding the features of historical knowledge\". It includes several stimuli (texts, images…) and a total of 39 items. The field trial of the test was applied to a convenience sample of 893 10th and 11th grade students, aged 16 to 18 years. Their answers were analysed statistically according to the Item Response Theory (IRT), and the results uphold the validity and reliability of the test instrument. The IRT analysis also enables us to take a first step towards defining levels of achievement and progress for the learning and acquisition of those competences. One implication of note of this research is the possible adoption of this model for assessing history, based both on applied content knowledge and historical thinking concepts and skills. Such a model of assessment would also stimulate more active, problem-based and motivating teaching approaches.","PeriodicalId":53851,"journal":{"name":"Historical Encounters-A Journal of Historical Consciousness Historical Cultures and History Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"30-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A competence-based test to assess historical thinking in secondary education: Design, application, and validation\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Domínguez-Castillo, Laura Arias-Ferrer, Raquel Sánchez-Ibáñez, Alejandro Egea-Vivancos, Francisco J García-Crespo, Pedro Miralles-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.52289/HEJ8.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the theoretical framework, application and final outcomes of a pilot test designed as a possible model for assessing students' historical thinking in Secondary Education. It is based both on widely accepted historical thinking concepts and on the assessment framework developed by PISA. The test tries to assess what could be named as the three major competences in history: \\\"explain historically\\\", \\\"use of sources as historical evidence\\\" and \\\"understanding the features of historical knowledge\\\". It includes several stimuli (texts, images…) and a total of 39 items. The field trial of the test was applied to a convenience sample of 893 10th and 11th grade students, aged 16 to 18 years. Their answers were analysed statistically according to the Item Response Theory (IRT), and the results uphold the validity and reliability of the test instrument. The IRT analysis also enables us to take a first step towards defining levels of achievement and progress for the learning and acquisition of those competences. One implication of note of this research is the possible adoption of this model for assessing history, based both on applied content knowledge and historical thinking concepts and skills. Such a model of assessment would also stimulate more active, problem-based and motivating teaching approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Encounters-A Journal of Historical Consciousness Historical Cultures and History Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"30-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Encounters-A Journal of Historical Consciousness Historical Cultures and History Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52289/HEJ8.103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Encounters-A Journal of Historical Consciousness Historical Cultures and History Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52289/HEJ8.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一个试点测试的理论框架、应用和最终结果,该测试旨在评估中等教育中学生的历史思维。它既基于广泛接受的历史思维概念,也基于PISA开发的评估框架。该测试试图评估历史上的三大能力:“解释历史”、“利用来源作为历史证据”和“理解历史知识的特征”。它包括几个刺激(文本、图像…)和总共39个项目。该测试的现场试验适用于893名年龄在16至18岁之间的10年级和11年级学生。根据项目反应理论(IRT)对他们的答案进行统计分析,结果证明了测试工具的有效性和可靠性。IRT分析还使我们能够朝着确定学习和获得这些能力的成就和进步水平迈出第一步。本研究值得注意的一点是,基于应用内容知识和历史思维概念和技能,可能采用这种模型来评估历史。这种评估模式还将激发更积极、基于问题和激励性的教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A competence-based test to assess historical thinking in secondary education: Design, application, and validation
This paper presents the theoretical framework, application and final outcomes of a pilot test designed as a possible model for assessing students' historical thinking in Secondary Education. It is based both on widely accepted historical thinking concepts and on the assessment framework developed by PISA. The test tries to assess what could be named as the three major competences in history: "explain historically", "use of sources as historical evidence" and "understanding the features of historical knowledge". It includes several stimuli (texts, images…) and a total of 39 items. The field trial of the test was applied to a convenience sample of 893 10th and 11th grade students, aged 16 to 18 years. Their answers were analysed statistically according to the Item Response Theory (IRT), and the results uphold the validity and reliability of the test instrument. The IRT analysis also enables us to take a first step towards defining levels of achievement and progress for the learning and acquisition of those competences. One implication of note of this research is the possible adoption of this model for assessing history, based both on applied content knowledge and historical thinking concepts and skills. Such a model of assessment would also stimulate more active, problem-based and motivating teaching approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Historical Encounters is a blind peer-reviewed, open access, interdsiciplinary journal dedicated to the empirical and theoretical study of: historical consciousness (how we experience the past as something alien to the present; how we understand and relate, both cognitively and affectively, to the past; and how our historically-constituted consciousness shapes our understanding and interpretation of historical representations in the present and influences how we orient ourselves to possible futures); historical cultures (the effective and affective relationship that a human group has with its own past; the agents who create and transform it; the oral, print, visual, dramatic, and interactive media representations by which it is disseminated; the personal, social, economic, and political uses to which it is put; and the processes of reception that shape encounters with it); history education (how we know, teach, and learn history through: schools, universities, museums, public commemorations, tourist venues, heritage sites, local history societies, and other formal and informal settings). Submissions from across the fields of public history, history didactics, curriculum & pedagogy studies, cultural studies, narrative theory, and historical theory fields are all welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信