建构现实:巴基斯坦英文媒体在独裁与民主政体中对克什米尔冲突的框架

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Muhammad Yousaf, B. Rahman, Zahid Yousaf
{"title":"建构现实:巴基斯坦英文媒体在独裁与民主政体中对克什米尔冲突的框架","authors":"Muhammad Yousaf, B. Rahman, Zahid Yousaf","doi":"10.15655/mw_2020_v11i3_203045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the framing of Kashmir conflict in the editorials of three PakistaniEnglish newspapers, The Nation, The Nation, and Dawn during dictatorial (Musharraf regime, 2005-2007) and the democratic regime (Zardari regime (20082010). It argues that in case of conflict press conforms to the government policies, change in governments also has an effect on how the press changes its coverage on the conflict according to the policies of the government. The study utilizes a content analysis method to examine the use of framing techniques in the newspapers. Findings supported that the Pakistani press indexed the ruling elite’s stance in both regimes. It was found that during the dictatorial regime, as Kashmir conflict was high on agenda, Pakistani English press gave more coverage to Kashmir conflict as compared to the democratic regime. The results also showed that during the dictatorial regime, the dialogue frame to resolve the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan was high, which was also in line with the policy of Musharraf ’s autocratic regime. Surprisingly, the press coverage in both regimes regarding the self-determination right for Kashmiris in the light of UNO resolutions, Pakistan’s longstanding stance, was minimal. The implications of the results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":52105,"journal":{"name":"Media Watch","volume":"11 1","pages":"401 - 415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing Reality: Framing of the Kashmir Conflict in Dictatorial and Democratic Regimes in the Pakistani English Press\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Yousaf, B. Rahman, Zahid Yousaf\",\"doi\":\"10.15655/mw_2020_v11i3_203045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the framing of Kashmir conflict in the editorials of three PakistaniEnglish newspapers, The Nation, The Nation, and Dawn during dictatorial (Musharraf regime, 2005-2007) and the democratic regime (Zardari regime (20082010). It argues that in case of conflict press conforms to the government policies, change in governments also has an effect on how the press changes its coverage on the conflict according to the policies of the government. The study utilizes a content analysis method to examine the use of framing techniques in the newspapers. Findings supported that the Pakistani press indexed the ruling elite’s stance in both regimes. It was found that during the dictatorial regime, as Kashmir conflict was high on agenda, Pakistani English press gave more coverage to Kashmir conflict as compared to the democratic regime. The results also showed that during the dictatorial regime, the dialogue frame to resolve the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan was high, which was also in line with the policy of Musharraf ’s autocratic regime. Surprisingly, the press coverage in both regimes regarding the self-determination right for Kashmiris in the light of UNO resolutions, Pakistan’s longstanding stance, was minimal. The implications of the results are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media Watch\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"401 - 415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media Watch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15655/mw_2020_v11i3_203045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Watch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15655/mw_2020_v11i3_203045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文考察了巴基斯坦三家英文报纸《国家报》、《国家报和黎明报》在独裁时期(穆沙拉夫政权,2005-2007年)和民主政权(扎尔达里政权,2008-2010年)的社论中对克什米尔冲突的框架。它认为,在冲突媒体符合政府政策的情况下,政府的变化也会影响媒体如何根据政府政策改变对冲突的报道。本研究采用内容分析的方法来检验框架技术在报纸中的使用。调查结果支持巴基斯坦媒体将统治精英在两个政权中的立场编入索引。研究发现,在独裁政权时期,由于克什米尔冲突是议程上的重点,与民主政权相比,巴基斯坦英语媒体对克什米尔冲突的报道更多。结果还表明,在独裁政权时期,解决印巴克什米尔冲突的对话框架较高,这也符合穆沙拉夫独裁政权的政策。令人惊讶的是,根据联合国办事处的决议,巴基斯坦的长期立场,两个政权对克什米尔人自决权的新闻报道很少。讨论了结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing Reality: Framing of the Kashmir Conflict in Dictatorial and Democratic Regimes in the Pakistani English Press
This paper examines the framing of Kashmir conflict in the editorials of three PakistaniEnglish newspapers, The Nation, The Nation, and Dawn during dictatorial (Musharraf regime, 2005-2007) and the democratic regime (Zardari regime (20082010). It argues that in case of conflict press conforms to the government policies, change in governments also has an effect on how the press changes its coverage on the conflict according to the policies of the government. The study utilizes a content analysis method to examine the use of framing techniques in the newspapers. Findings supported that the Pakistani press indexed the ruling elite’s stance in both regimes. It was found that during the dictatorial regime, as Kashmir conflict was high on agenda, Pakistani English press gave more coverage to Kashmir conflict as compared to the democratic regime. The results also showed that during the dictatorial regime, the dialogue frame to resolve the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan was high, which was also in line with the policy of Musharraf ’s autocratic regime. Surprisingly, the press coverage in both regimes regarding the self-determination right for Kashmiris in the light of UNO resolutions, Pakistan’s longstanding stance, was minimal. The implications of the results are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Media Watch
Media Watch Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Journal of Media Watch is a double blind peer-reviewed tri-annual journal published from India. It is the only journal in the discipline from Asia and India listed in many leading indexing platforms. The journal keeps high quality peer evaluation and academic standards in all levels of its publication. Journal of Media Watch reflects empirical and fundamental research, theoretical articulations, alternative critical thinking, diverse knowledge spectrum, cognizant technologies, scientific postulates, alternative social synergies, exploratory documentations, visual enquiries, narrative argumentations, innovative interventions, and minority inclusiveness in its content and selection. The journal aims at publishing and documenting research publication in the field of communication and media studies that covers a wide range of topics and sub-fields like print media, television, radio, film, public relations, advertising, journalism and social media and the cultural impact and activation of these media in the society. It aims at providing a platform for the scholars to present their research to an international academic community with wide access and reach. Published topics in Media Watch enjoy very high impact and major citation. The journal is supported by strong international editorial advisory support from leading academicians in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信