安全性和可访问性的挑战：2019冠状病毒病时代快速转向在线治疗的关键观点

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Psychotherapy and Politics International Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1002/ppi.1581

Julia Ioane, C. Knibbs, Keith Tudor

{"title":"安全性和可访问性的挑战：2019冠状病毒病时代快速转向在线治疗的关键观点","authors":"Julia Ioane, C. Knibbs, Keith Tudor","doi":"10.1002/ppi.1581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article offers some critiques of the rapid move to online therapies in response to the restriction of movement and in‐person psychotherapeutic and psychological practice, imposed by necessary responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The critique is informed by concerns about the security of online therapeutic practice; informed by, but not restricted to, legislation and practice in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, it includes cultural perspectives regarding healthcare provision, specifically with Pacific communities in Aotearoa New Zealand and, more broadly, with regard to disadvantaged and vulnerable clients and communities throughout the world. The article offers a framework that accounts for the challenge of making practical, culturally appropriate, and therapeutic decisions about the security and accessibility of online therapeutic practice.","PeriodicalId":42499,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Politics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ppi.1581","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenge of security and accessibility: Critical perspectives on the rapid move to online therapies in the age of COVID‐19\",\"authors\":\"Julia Ioane, C. Knibbs, Keith Tudor\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppi.1581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article offers some critiques of the rapid move to online therapies in response to the restriction of movement and in‐person psychotherapeutic and psychological practice, imposed by necessary responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The critique is informed by concerns about the security of online therapeutic practice; informed by, but not restricted to, legislation and practice in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, it includes cultural perspectives regarding healthcare provision, specifically with Pacific communities in Aotearoa New Zealand and, more broadly, with regard to disadvantaged and vulnerable clients and communities throughout the world. The article offers a framework that accounts for the challenge of making practical, culturally appropriate, and therapeutic decisions about the security and accessibility of online therapeutic practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy and Politics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ppi.1581\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy and Politics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Politics International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要——这篇文章对针对新冠肺炎疫情的必要应对措施对行动的限制以及面对面的心理治疗和心理实践迅速转向在线治疗提出了一些批评。这一批评是基于对在线治疗实践安全性的担忧；了解但不限于英国的立法和实践。此外，它还包括有关医疗保健提供的文化观点，特别是与新西兰奥特亚的太平洋社区，以及更广泛地与世界各地的弱势和弱势客户和社区。这篇文章提供了一个框架，说明了就在线治疗实践的安全性和可访问性做出实用、文化上合适的治疗决策的挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The challenge of security and accessibility: Critical perspectives on the rapid move to online therapies in the age of COVID‐19

Abstract This article offers some critiques of the rapid move to online therapies in response to the restriction of movement and in‐person psychotherapeutic and psychological practice, imposed by necessary responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The critique is informed by concerns about the security of online therapeutic practice; informed by, but not restricted to, legislation and practice in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, it includes cultural perspectives regarding healthcare provision, specifically with Pacific communities in Aotearoa New Zealand and, more broadly, with regard to disadvantaged and vulnerable clients and communities throughout the world. The article offers a framework that accounts for the challenge of making practical, culturally appropriate, and therapeutic decisions about the security and accessibility of online therapeutic practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychotherapy and Politics International PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Psychotherapy and Politics International explores the connections and interactions between politics and psychotherapy, both in theory and in practice. It focuses on the application to political problematics of thinking that originates in the field of psychotherapy, and equally on the application within the field of psychotherapy of political concepts and values internationally. The journal welcomes articles from all modalities or schools of psychotherapy and from across the political spectrum.