来曲唑和克罗米芬对伊拉克女性多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵的治疗作用

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
H. Najim, W. Al-khfajy, Z. Albasry, A. Al-taie
{"title":"来曲唑和克罗米芬对伊拉克女性多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵的治疗作用","authors":"H. Najim, W. Al-khfajy, Z. Albasry, A. Al-taie","doi":"10.4103/ijam.ijam_90_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is the most commonly used ovulation induction agent in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Letrozole has attracted attention for its ovulation induction effects as a safe, potentially better alternative to CC. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of letrozole in comparison to CC for ovulation induction in female patients with PCOS in Baghdad Province, Iraq. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled study was carried out on 166 female patients diagnosed with anovulatory infertility due to PCOS and randomly assigned into two groups. Group A included ninety-four participants who received CC. Group B included 85 participants who received letrozole. The main outcomes were the ovulation induction and therapeutic outcomes of CC and letrozole, including endometrial thickness, number of mature follicles, pregnancy rate, number of stimulated cycles and mono-ovulation rate. Results: Endometrial thickness improved significantly more with CC than with letrozole (8.08 ± 1.28 vs. 7.66 ± 1.41; P = 0.05), as did the number of mature follicles (3.07 ± 1.23 vs. 1.97 ± 0.83; P = 0.0001). Nevertheless, Group B patients reported a higher significant rate compared to Group A regarding pregnancy rate (62% vs. 38%; P < 0.01), number of stimulated cycles (91% vs. 78%; P < 0.05), and mono-ovulation rate (29% vs. 5.75%; P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Letrozole is preferable to CC in terms of a higher pregnancy rate as well as mono-follicles' ability to decrease the risk of multiple pregnancies, which is clearly observed with CC. The higher success of letrozole over CC is thought to be related to the higher ovulation rate per cycle. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Patient care and procedural skills, medical knowledge.","PeriodicalId":36495,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"47 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic impact of letrozole and clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in Iraqi female patients with polycystic ovary syndrome\",\"authors\":\"H. Najim, W. Al-khfajy, Z. Albasry, A. Al-taie\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijam.ijam_90_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is the most commonly used ovulation induction agent in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Letrozole has attracted attention for its ovulation induction effects as a safe, potentially better alternative to CC. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of letrozole in comparison to CC for ovulation induction in female patients with PCOS in Baghdad Province, Iraq. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled study was carried out on 166 female patients diagnosed with anovulatory infertility due to PCOS and randomly assigned into two groups. Group A included ninety-four participants who received CC. Group B included 85 participants who received letrozole. The main outcomes were the ovulation induction and therapeutic outcomes of CC and letrozole, including endometrial thickness, number of mature follicles, pregnancy rate, number of stimulated cycles and mono-ovulation rate. Results: Endometrial thickness improved significantly more with CC than with letrozole (8.08 ± 1.28 vs. 7.66 ± 1.41; P = 0.05), as did the number of mature follicles (3.07 ± 1.23 vs. 1.97 ± 0.83; P = 0.0001). Nevertheless, Group B patients reported a higher significant rate compared to Group A regarding pregnancy rate (62% vs. 38%; P < 0.01), number of stimulated cycles (91% vs. 78%; P < 0.05), and mono-ovulation rate (29% vs. 5.75%; P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Letrozole is preferable to CC in terms of a higher pregnancy rate as well as mono-follicles' ability to decrease the risk of multiple pregnancies, which is clearly observed with CC. The higher success of letrozole over CC is thought to be related to the higher ovulation rate per cycle. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Patient care and procedural skills, medical knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_90_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_90_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:克罗米芬柠檬酸盐(CC)是多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女最常用的促排卵剂。来曲唑作为一种安全、可能更好的CC替代品,其促排卵效果引起了人们的关注。本研究的目的是比较来曲唑与CC在伊拉克巴格达省女性多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵方面的疗效。材料和方法:对166例被诊断为多囊卵巢综合征无排卵性不孕的女性患者进行前瞻性、随机、对照研究,并将其随机分为两组。A组包括94名接受CC治疗的参与者,B组包括85名接受来曲唑治疗的参与者。主要结果是CC和来曲唑的促排卵和治疗结果,包括子宫内膜厚度、成熟卵泡数、妊娠率、刺激周期数和单次排卵率。结果:CC组子宫内膜厚度的改善明显大于来曲唑组(8.08±1.28 vs.7.66±1.41;P=0.005),成熟卵泡数的改善也更为显著(3.07±1.23 vs.1.97±0.83;P=0.0001)。然而,B组患者的妊娠率高于a组(62%vs.38%;P<0.01),刺激周期数(91%对78%;P<0.05)和单排卵率(29%对5.75%;P=0.0001)。结论:就较高的妊娠率和单卵泡降低多胎妊娠风险的能力而言,来曲唑优于CC,这在CC中可以清楚地观察到。来曲唑的成功率高于CC被认为与每个周期的排卵率较高有关。本文涉及以下核心能力:患者护理和程序技能、医学知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic impact of letrozole and clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in Iraqi female patients with polycystic ovary syndrome
Introduction: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is the most commonly used ovulation induction agent in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Letrozole has attracted attention for its ovulation induction effects as a safe, potentially better alternative to CC. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of letrozole in comparison to CC for ovulation induction in female patients with PCOS in Baghdad Province, Iraq. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled study was carried out on 166 female patients diagnosed with anovulatory infertility due to PCOS and randomly assigned into two groups. Group A included ninety-four participants who received CC. Group B included 85 participants who received letrozole. The main outcomes were the ovulation induction and therapeutic outcomes of CC and letrozole, including endometrial thickness, number of mature follicles, pregnancy rate, number of stimulated cycles and mono-ovulation rate. Results: Endometrial thickness improved significantly more with CC than with letrozole (8.08 ± 1.28 vs. 7.66 ± 1.41; P = 0.05), as did the number of mature follicles (3.07 ± 1.23 vs. 1.97 ± 0.83; P = 0.0001). Nevertheless, Group B patients reported a higher significant rate compared to Group A regarding pregnancy rate (62% vs. 38%; P < 0.01), number of stimulated cycles (91% vs. 78%; P < 0.05), and mono-ovulation rate (29% vs. 5.75%; P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Letrozole is preferable to CC in terms of a higher pregnancy rate as well as mono-follicles' ability to decrease the risk of multiple pregnancies, which is clearly observed with CC. The higher success of letrozole over CC is thought to be related to the higher ovulation rate per cycle. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Patient care and procedural skills, medical knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Academic Medicine
International Journal of Academic Medicine Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信