考虑应变局部化的镍基高温合金延性破坏准则的校正

Q4 Engineering
Bartosz Madejski, G. Socha
{"title":"考虑应变局部化的镍基高温合金延性破坏准则的校正","authors":"Bartosz Madejski, G. Socha","doi":"10.1515/fas-2017-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Static tension test allows characterization of material strength properties. This simple test provides input data for numerical calculation of structural components made of the tested alloy. Elastic, plastic and failure behavior of the structural component in question is simulated, using, for example, the FEM package, based on parameters obtained as the result of tensile testing. When using the results of the tensile test for modeling the material failure it is important to estimate correctly plastic strain corresponding to failure. It is common practice to use elongation of the specimen gage part for the calculation of failure strain. On the other side, the most popular ductile failure criterion used by engineers performing numerical simulation of the material’s behavior relies on the equivalent plastic strain as the criterial quantity. Those two parameters can differ significantly. In order to calculate the equivalent plastic strain correctly, we have to remember about strain localization (necking) appearing during tensile tests and take into account the fact that during tensile testing we have three non-zero strain tensor components. Ignoring this fact, and using only elongation as the criterial quantity can lead to enormous simulation error. This error is analyzed in this paper for nickel based superalloy tested at elevated temperatures.","PeriodicalId":37629,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue of Aircraft Structures","volume":"2017 1","pages":"27 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration of the Ductile Failure Criterion for Nickel-Based Superalloys taking into Account the Localization of the Strain\",\"authors\":\"Bartosz Madejski, G. Socha\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/fas-2017-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Static tension test allows characterization of material strength properties. This simple test provides input data for numerical calculation of structural components made of the tested alloy. Elastic, plastic and failure behavior of the structural component in question is simulated, using, for example, the FEM package, based on parameters obtained as the result of tensile testing. When using the results of the tensile test for modeling the material failure it is important to estimate correctly plastic strain corresponding to failure. It is common practice to use elongation of the specimen gage part for the calculation of failure strain. On the other side, the most popular ductile failure criterion used by engineers performing numerical simulation of the material’s behavior relies on the equivalent plastic strain as the criterial quantity. Those two parameters can differ significantly. In order to calculate the equivalent plastic strain correctly, we have to remember about strain localization (necking) appearing during tensile tests and take into account the fact that during tensile testing we have three non-zero strain tensor components. Ignoring this fact, and using only elongation as the criterial quantity can lead to enormous simulation error. This error is analyzed in this paper for nickel based superalloy tested at elevated temperatures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fatigue of Aircraft Structures\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fatigue of Aircraft Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/fas-2017-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue of Aircraft Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fas-2017-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要静态拉伸试验可以表征材料的强度特性。这种简单的测试为由测试合金制成的结构部件的数值计算提供了输入数据。基于作为拉伸测试结果获得的参数,使用例如FEM包来模拟所讨论的结构部件的弹性、塑性和失效行为。当使用拉伸试验的结果来模拟材料失效时,正确估计失效对应的塑性应变是很重要的。通常的做法是使用试样规部分的伸长率来计算失效应变。另一方面,工程师在对材料行为进行数值模拟时使用的最流行的延性破坏准则依赖于等效塑性应变作为标准量。这两个参数可能存在显著差异。为了正确计算等效塑性应变,我们必须记住拉伸试验中出现的应变局部化(颈缩),并考虑到在拉伸试验中我们有三个非零应变张量分量。忽略这一事实,只使用伸长率作为标准量,可能会导致巨大的模拟误差。本文对镍基高温合金高温试验的误差进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calibration of the Ductile Failure Criterion for Nickel-Based Superalloys taking into Account the Localization of the Strain
Abstract Static tension test allows characterization of material strength properties. This simple test provides input data for numerical calculation of structural components made of the tested alloy. Elastic, plastic and failure behavior of the structural component in question is simulated, using, for example, the FEM package, based on parameters obtained as the result of tensile testing. When using the results of the tensile test for modeling the material failure it is important to estimate correctly plastic strain corresponding to failure. It is common practice to use elongation of the specimen gage part for the calculation of failure strain. On the other side, the most popular ductile failure criterion used by engineers performing numerical simulation of the material’s behavior relies on the equivalent plastic strain as the criterial quantity. Those two parameters can differ significantly. In order to calculate the equivalent plastic strain correctly, we have to remember about strain localization (necking) appearing during tensile tests and take into account the fact that during tensile testing we have three non-zero strain tensor components. Ignoring this fact, and using only elongation as the criterial quantity can lead to enormous simulation error. This error is analyzed in this paper for nickel based superalloy tested at elevated temperatures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The publication focuses on problems of aeronautical fatigue and structural integrity. The preferred topics include: full-scale fatigue testing of aircraft and aircraft structural components, fatigue of materials and structures, advanced materials and innovative structural concepts, damage tolerant design of aircraft structure, life extension and management of ageing fleets, structural health monitoring and loads, fatigue crack growth and life prediction methods, NDT inspections, airworthiness considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信