不太可能配对?荷兰绘画如何照亮路易十四的法国

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Bram van Leuveren
{"title":"不太可能配对?荷兰绘画如何照亮路易十四的法国","authors":"Bram van Leuveren","doi":"10.1080/14629712.2021.1888457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A t first glance, the late seventeenth-century French court of Louis XIV, resplendent with visual and performing arts that glorified the Sun King as sovereign not only of France but of the entire universe, seems to have little in common with the Dutch Republic. Governed by prosperous burghers, the Republic excelled at paintings that meticulously recorded the daily lives of its citizens in mundane settings such as canal houses, city streets, taverns and marketplaces. The documentary-like quality of Netherlandish art surely was a far cry from the customary French depictions of King Louis as the mythological god Apollo. In Crowning Glories, Harriet Stone argues that it was precisely this stark difference between Dutch and French art that captured the imagination of the French elite. She notes that between Louis XIV’s birth in  and his death in  Netherlandish paintings by artists like Anthony van Dyck (–) and Rembrandt van Rijn (–) abound in royal and private art collections across France (p. ). Mostly drawing on her own close readings of Dutch painting and French court art, Stone proposes the intriguing view that Netherlandish ‘realism’ offered the French bourgeoisie a vision of reality which, through its seemingly unmediated documentation of daily life in the Republic, unintentionally challenged France’s promotion of Louis XIV as Apollonian centre of the universe. However, Stone’s argument that the fascination of Dutch artists with recording the everyday was part of ‘a scientific, empirical approach’, in contrast to the propagandistic nature of King Louis’s art, and that it even paved the way for the Enlightenment in France (p. ), is open to criticism and could have been supported by more historical evidence. The focus of Crowning Glories on the cultural exchanges between late seventeenth-century France and the Dutch Republic is timely and original. Although transnational research on the early modern history of both nations was pioneered in the late s, scholarship on the topic has only recently begun to blossom and is still mostly concerned with the shared diplomatic and political history of France and the Republic in the second half of the sixteenth century.","PeriodicalId":37034,"journal":{"name":"Court Historian","volume":"26 1","pages":"99 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14629712.2021.1888457","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Unlikely Pairing? How Netherlandish Painting Brought Light to Louis XIV’s France\",\"authors\":\"Bram van Leuveren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14629712.2021.1888457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A t first glance, the late seventeenth-century French court of Louis XIV, resplendent with visual and performing arts that glorified the Sun King as sovereign not only of France but of the entire universe, seems to have little in common with the Dutch Republic. Governed by prosperous burghers, the Republic excelled at paintings that meticulously recorded the daily lives of its citizens in mundane settings such as canal houses, city streets, taverns and marketplaces. The documentary-like quality of Netherlandish art surely was a far cry from the customary French depictions of King Louis as the mythological god Apollo. In Crowning Glories, Harriet Stone argues that it was precisely this stark difference between Dutch and French art that captured the imagination of the French elite. She notes that between Louis XIV’s birth in  and his death in  Netherlandish paintings by artists like Anthony van Dyck (–) and Rembrandt van Rijn (–) abound in royal and private art collections across France (p. ). Mostly drawing on her own close readings of Dutch painting and French court art, Stone proposes the intriguing view that Netherlandish ‘realism’ offered the French bourgeoisie a vision of reality which, through its seemingly unmediated documentation of daily life in the Republic, unintentionally challenged France’s promotion of Louis XIV as Apollonian centre of the universe. However, Stone’s argument that the fascination of Dutch artists with recording the everyday was part of ‘a scientific, empirical approach’, in contrast to the propagandistic nature of King Louis’s art, and that it even paved the way for the Enlightenment in France (p. ), is open to criticism and could have been supported by more historical evidence. The focus of Crowning Glories on the cultural exchanges between late seventeenth-century France and the Dutch Republic is timely and original. Although transnational research on the early modern history of both nations was pioneered in the late s, scholarship on the topic has only recently begun to blossom and is still mostly concerned with the shared diplomatic and political history of France and the Republic in the second half of the sixteenth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court Historian\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"99 - 103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14629712.2021.1888457\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court Historian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2021.1888457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court Historian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2021.1888457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乍一看,十七世纪末的法国路易十四宫廷,以视觉和表演艺术为辉煌,将太阳王不仅美化为法国的君主,而且美化为整个宇宙的君主,似乎与荷兰共和国没有什么共同之处。共和国由富裕的市民统治,擅长绘画,精心记录其公民在运河房屋、城市街道、酒馆和市场等世俗环境中的日常生活。荷兰艺术的纪录片般的品质肯定与法国将路易国王描绘成神话中的阿波罗相去甚远。哈里特·斯通(Harriet Stone)在《王冠上的光辉》(Crowning Glories)一书中认为,正是荷兰和法国艺术之间的这种明显差异吸引了法国精英的想象力。她指出,在路易十四于 他于年去世 安东尼·范戴克等艺术家的荷兰绘画(–) 和伦勃朗(–) 法国各地的皇家和私人艺术品收藏丰富(p。). 斯通主要借鉴了她自己对荷兰绘画和法国宫廷艺术的细读,她提出了一个有趣的观点,即荷兰的“现实主义”为法国资产阶级提供了一种现实的视野,通过其对共和国日常生活的看似未经调解的记录,无意中挑战了法国对路易十四作为阿波罗宇宙中心的宣传。然而,斯通认为,荷兰艺术家对记录日常生活的着迷是“科学、实证方法”的一部分,这与路易国王艺术的宣传性质形成了鲜明对比,甚至为法国的启蒙运动铺平了道路(p。), 可以接受批评,本可以得到更多历史证据的支持。《王冠上的光辉》对十七世纪末法国与荷兰文化交流的关注是及时而新颖的。尽管对两国早期现代史的跨国研究是在晚期开创的s、 关于这一主题的学术界最近才开始蓬勃发展,目前仍主要关注法国和共和国在16世纪下半叶的共同外交和政治历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Unlikely Pairing? How Netherlandish Painting Brought Light to Louis XIV’s France
A t first glance, the late seventeenth-century French court of Louis XIV, resplendent with visual and performing arts that glorified the Sun King as sovereign not only of France but of the entire universe, seems to have little in common with the Dutch Republic. Governed by prosperous burghers, the Republic excelled at paintings that meticulously recorded the daily lives of its citizens in mundane settings such as canal houses, city streets, taverns and marketplaces. The documentary-like quality of Netherlandish art surely was a far cry from the customary French depictions of King Louis as the mythological god Apollo. In Crowning Glories, Harriet Stone argues that it was precisely this stark difference between Dutch and French art that captured the imagination of the French elite. She notes that between Louis XIV’s birth in  and his death in  Netherlandish paintings by artists like Anthony van Dyck (–) and Rembrandt van Rijn (–) abound in royal and private art collections across France (p. ). Mostly drawing on her own close readings of Dutch painting and French court art, Stone proposes the intriguing view that Netherlandish ‘realism’ offered the French bourgeoisie a vision of reality which, through its seemingly unmediated documentation of daily life in the Republic, unintentionally challenged France’s promotion of Louis XIV as Apollonian centre of the universe. However, Stone’s argument that the fascination of Dutch artists with recording the everyday was part of ‘a scientific, empirical approach’, in contrast to the propagandistic nature of King Louis’s art, and that it even paved the way for the Enlightenment in France (p. ), is open to criticism and could have been supported by more historical evidence. The focus of Crowning Glories on the cultural exchanges between late seventeenth-century France and the Dutch Republic is timely and original. Although transnational research on the early modern history of both nations was pioneered in the late s, scholarship on the topic has only recently begun to blossom and is still mostly concerned with the shared diplomatic and political history of France and the Republic in the second half of the sixteenth century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Court Historian
Court Historian Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信