达到高度:将街头吸毒者的紧急做法转化为城市减少危害研究所——对城市治理的影响

IF 1.2 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Urban Forum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-16 DOI:10.1007/s12132-021-09452-6
Monique Marks, Sogen Moodley
{"title":"达到高度:将街头吸毒者的紧急做法转化为城市减少危害研究所——对城市治理的影响","authors":"Monique Marks, Sogen Moodley","doi":"10.1007/s12132-021-09452-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Problematic drug use is a growing problem in South African urban spaces. In Durban, as in other cities in the country, the dominant response of the capital-oriented Municipality has been to make drug use invisible through prohibition and a promotion of abstinence approaches. This governance mentality and technology has failed dismally, evidenced in the rise of street-level heroin use. During the COVID-19 hard lockdown, the municipality was forced to re-examine its governance approach to drug use, taking guidance from non-state actors in an attempt to more effectively reduce the harms associated with drug use. In tracing the historical contestations around street-level drug use in Durban, this paper shares the untold story of how, when prompted by an unforeseen crisis, a municipality was able to successfully shift its mentality and technology in governing street-level drug use. Drawing conceptually on nodal governance theory and the quadruple helix approach, it reveals the complexities of urban governance processes and demonstrates the power of political opportunities, the transformative role of unexpected consequences, and the importance of informed political leadership. It also shows how multi-stakeholder partnership projects can be a useful mechanism not only to implement innovative and creative policy goals, but also to build robust relationships to navigate the manifestation of informal urbanism. It also calls for governing through harm minimisation rather than through actuarial risk management approaches that are closely associated with a neoliberal agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":35221,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forum","volume":"33 1","pages":"485-504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reaching High: Translating Emergent Practices of Street-Level Drug Users to Institute Harm Reduction in Durban-Implications for Urban Governance.\",\"authors\":\"Monique Marks, Sogen Moodley\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12132-021-09452-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Problematic drug use is a growing problem in South African urban spaces. In Durban, as in other cities in the country, the dominant response of the capital-oriented Municipality has been to make drug use invisible through prohibition and a promotion of abstinence approaches. This governance mentality and technology has failed dismally, evidenced in the rise of street-level heroin use. During the COVID-19 hard lockdown, the municipality was forced to re-examine its governance approach to drug use, taking guidance from non-state actors in an attempt to more effectively reduce the harms associated with drug use. In tracing the historical contestations around street-level drug use in Durban, this paper shares the untold story of how, when prompted by an unforeseen crisis, a municipality was able to successfully shift its mentality and technology in governing street-level drug use. Drawing conceptually on nodal governance theory and the quadruple helix approach, it reveals the complexities of urban governance processes and demonstrates the power of political opportunities, the transformative role of unexpected consequences, and the importance of informed political leadership. It also shows how multi-stakeholder partnership projects can be a useful mechanism not only to implement innovative and creative policy goals, but also to build robust relationships to navigate the manifestation of informal urbanism. It also calls for governing through harm minimisation rather than through actuarial risk management approaches that are closely associated with a neoliberal agenda.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forum\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"485-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592825/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-021-09452-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-021-09452-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吸毒问题是南非城市空间日益严重的问题。在德班,如同在该国其他城市一样,以资本为导向的市政当局的主要反应是通过禁止和提倡戒除方法使吸毒隐形。这种治理心态和技术已经严重失败,街头海洛因使用的增加就是明证。在2019冠状病毒病硬封锁期间,该市被迫重新审视其吸毒治理方法,接受非国家行为体的指导,试图更有效地减少与吸毒相关的危害。在追溯德班街头毒品使用的历史争论时,本文分享了一个不为人知的故事,即在一场不可预见的危机的推动下,市政当局如何能够成功地改变其管理街头毒品使用的心态和技术。它从概念上借鉴了节点治理理论和四螺旋方法,揭示了城市治理过程的复杂性,并展示了政治机会的力量、意外后果的变革作用以及知情政治领导的重要性。它还表明,多方利益相关者伙伴关系项目可以成为一种有用的机制,不仅可以实施创新和创造性的政策目标,还可以建立牢固的关系,以应对非正式城市主义的表现形式。它还呼吁通过危害最小化来进行治理,而不是通过与新自由主义议程密切相关的精算风险管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reaching High: Translating Emergent Practices of Street-Level Drug Users to Institute Harm Reduction in Durban-Implications for Urban Governance.

Problematic drug use is a growing problem in South African urban spaces. In Durban, as in other cities in the country, the dominant response of the capital-oriented Municipality has been to make drug use invisible through prohibition and a promotion of abstinence approaches. This governance mentality and technology has failed dismally, evidenced in the rise of street-level heroin use. During the COVID-19 hard lockdown, the municipality was forced to re-examine its governance approach to drug use, taking guidance from non-state actors in an attempt to more effectively reduce the harms associated with drug use. In tracing the historical contestations around street-level drug use in Durban, this paper shares the untold story of how, when prompted by an unforeseen crisis, a municipality was able to successfully shift its mentality and technology in governing street-level drug use. Drawing conceptually on nodal governance theory and the quadruple helix approach, it reveals the complexities of urban governance processes and demonstrates the power of political opportunities, the transformative role of unexpected consequences, and the importance of informed political leadership. It also shows how multi-stakeholder partnership projects can be a useful mechanism not only to implement innovative and creative policy goals, but also to build robust relationships to navigate the manifestation of informal urbanism. It also calls for governing through harm minimisation rather than through actuarial risk management approaches that are closely associated with a neoliberal agenda.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Forum
Urban Forum Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: This journal publishes papers, which engage broadly with urban processes, developments, challenges, politics and people, providing a distinctive African focus on these themes.  Topics covered variously engage with the dynamics of governance, everyday urban life, economies and environments. The journal uses empirical data to reinforce and refine theoretical developments in urban studies, draws on the specificities of the African context, and opens up geographically diverse conversations on African cities. Urban Forum welcomes papers that provide rich evidence from African cities and, in doing so, builds debate and theory that often remains peripheral to urban scholarship.  The journal is open to research based on a range of methodologies, but prioritizes qualitative analysis and interpretation. With this mix, research in Urban Forum demonstrates the ordinary and the exceptional nature of urbanization in African cities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信