Bridgette Martin Hard, Nathan Liang, M. Wong, S. Flusberg
{"title":"我们用隐喻来教学","authors":"Bridgette Martin Hard, Nathan Liang, M. Wong, S. Flusberg","doi":"10.1075/msw.19021.har","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Teaching is a complex activity that people often discuss metaphorically, as when a professor is described as a\n sculptor molding impressionable students. What do such metaphors reveal about how people conceptualize teaching? Previous\n work has addressed related questions largely via researcher intuition and qualitative analyses of teacher attitudes. We sought to develop a\n more principled method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts, using teaching metaphors as a case study. We presented\n participants with one of four common metaphors for the teacher-student relationship (identified in a preliminary study) and asked them to\n rate the degree to which a series of teacher attributes fit the metaphor. We then used iterated exploratory factor analysis to identify a\n small number of dimensions that underlie people’s conceptions of teachers and examined whether the metaphors systematically differed along\n these dimensions. We found that teaching metaphors bring to mind distinct, coherent clusters of teacher attributes and different intuitions\n about teacher responsibility and power – a finding we replicated in a larger, pre-registered follow-up study using a new set of\n participants. This work provides a novel method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts and sets the stage for educational\n interventions centered on shifting lay theories of teaching.","PeriodicalId":51936,"journal":{"name":"Metaphor and the Social World","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metaphors we teach by\",\"authors\":\"Bridgette Martin Hard, Nathan Liang, M. Wong, S. Flusberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/msw.19021.har\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Teaching is a complex activity that people often discuss metaphorically, as when a professor is described as a\\n sculptor molding impressionable students. What do such metaphors reveal about how people conceptualize teaching? Previous\\n work has addressed related questions largely via researcher intuition and qualitative analyses of teacher attitudes. We sought to develop a\\n more principled method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts, using teaching metaphors as a case study. We presented\\n participants with one of four common metaphors for the teacher-student relationship (identified in a preliminary study) and asked them to\\n rate the degree to which a series of teacher attributes fit the metaphor. We then used iterated exploratory factor analysis to identify a\\n small number of dimensions that underlie people’s conceptions of teachers and examined whether the metaphors systematically differed along\\n these dimensions. We found that teaching metaphors bring to mind distinct, coherent clusters of teacher attributes and different intuitions\\n about teacher responsibility and power – a finding we replicated in a larger, pre-registered follow-up study using a new set of\\n participants. This work provides a novel method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts and sets the stage for educational\\n interventions centered on shifting lay theories of teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metaphor and the Social World\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metaphor and the Social World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19021.har\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metaphor and the Social World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19021.har","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Teaching is a complex activity that people often discuss metaphorically, as when a professor is described as a
sculptor molding impressionable students. What do such metaphors reveal about how people conceptualize teaching? Previous
work has addressed related questions largely via researcher intuition and qualitative analyses of teacher attitudes. We sought to develop a
more principled method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts, using teaching metaphors as a case study. We presented
participants with one of four common metaphors for the teacher-student relationship (identified in a preliminary study) and asked them to
rate the degree to which a series of teacher attributes fit the metaphor. We then used iterated exploratory factor analysis to identify a
small number of dimensions that underlie people’s conceptions of teachers and examined whether the metaphors systematically differed along
these dimensions. We found that teaching metaphors bring to mind distinct, coherent clusters of teacher attributes and different intuitions
about teacher responsibility and power – a finding we replicated in a larger, pre-registered follow-up study using a new set of
participants. This work provides a novel method for mapping the entailments of metaphorical concepts and sets the stage for educational
interventions centered on shifting lay theories of teaching.
期刊介绍:
The journal Metaphor and the Social World aims to provide a forum for researchers to share with each other, and with potential research users, work that explores aspects of metaphor and the social world. The term “social world” signals the importance given to context (of metaphor use), to connections (e.g. across social, cognitive and discourse dimensions of metaphor use), and to communication (between individuals or across social groups). The journal is not restricted to a single disciplinary or theoretical framework but welcomes papers based in a range of theoretical approaches to metaphor, including discourse and cognitive linguistic approaches, provided that the theory adequately supports the empirical work. Metaphor may be dealt with as either a matter of language or of thought, or of both; what matters is that consideration is given to the social and discourse contexts in which metaphor is found. Furthermore, “metaphor” is broadly interpreted and articles are welcomed on metonymy and other types of figurative language. A further aim is to encourage the development of high-quality research methodology using metaphor as an investigative tool, and for investigating the nature of metaphor use, for example multi-modal discourse analytic or corpus linguistic approaches to metaphor data. The journal publishes various types of articles, including reports of empirical studies, key articles accompanied by short responses, reviews and meta-analyses with commentaries. The Forum section publishes short responses to papers or current issues.