信息技术部门在医疗保健中的需求治理:一个案例系列的思考

ACI open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1749194
M. Leu, Diego Ize-Ludlow, A. Landman, Hamed Abbaszadegan, Craig B. Monsen
{"title":"信息技术部门在医疗保健中的需求治理:一个案例系列的思考","authors":"M. Leu, Diego Ize-Ludlow, A. Landman, Hamed Abbaszadegan, Craig B. Monsen","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1749194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Little is written on how best to structure IT governance in health care organizations. Governance is challenging because these groups may contain administrators, clinicians, and staff in addition to IT employees; projects may be complex and have significant impact on the teams that provide patient care.\n Methods Peer organizations in health care were purposefully selected and C-suite executives were interviewed about their IT governance. Notes taken from these conversations were analyzed for guiding principles.\n Results We interviewed leaders from five peer organizations. Consensus principles included: (1) minimize unwarranted variation; (2) evolve governance with the organization but independently of projects; (3) govern all clinical applications; (4) be flexible with intake, yet clear on decision-making; (5) have a tiered approach to governance; and (6) be multidisciplinary. Emerging principles included: (1) assign an IT business relationship manager to each high priority initiative, (2) have a clear escalation path to a small number of decision-makers, (3) include analytics to inform governance, (4) leverage Informatics expertise, and (5) use structured tools to streamline the process.\n Conclusion While IT governance is very different across distinct health care organizations, there are some general principles that many share.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IT Department Demand Governance in Health Care: Reflections on a Case Series\",\"authors\":\"M. Leu, Diego Ize-Ludlow, A. Landman, Hamed Abbaszadegan, Craig B. Monsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1749194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background Little is written on how best to structure IT governance in health care organizations. Governance is challenging because these groups may contain administrators, clinicians, and staff in addition to IT employees; projects may be complex and have significant impact on the teams that provide patient care.\\n Methods Peer organizations in health care were purposefully selected and C-suite executives were interviewed about their IT governance. Notes taken from these conversations were analyzed for guiding principles.\\n Results We interviewed leaders from five peer organizations. Consensus principles included: (1) minimize unwarranted variation; (2) evolve governance with the organization but independently of projects; (3) govern all clinical applications; (4) be flexible with intake, yet clear on decision-making; (5) have a tiered approach to governance; and (6) be multidisciplinary. Emerging principles included: (1) assign an IT business relationship manager to each high priority initiative, (2) have a clear escalation path to a small number of decision-makers, (3) include analytics to inform governance, (4) leverage Informatics expertise, and (5) use structured tools to streamline the process.\\n Conclusion While IT governance is very different across distinct health care organizations, there are some general principles that many share.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACI open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACI open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 关于如何在医疗保健组织中最好地构建IT治理,几乎没有什么文章。治理具有挑战性,因为除了IT员工之外,这些群体可能还包括管理员、临床医生和员工;项目可能很复杂,对提供患者护理的团队有重大影响。方法 有目的地选择了医疗保健领域的同行组织,并就其IT治理对高管进行了采访。对这些对话中的笔记进行了指导原则分析。后果 我们采访了五个同行组织的领导人。协商一致原则包括:(1)尽量减少不必要的变化;(2) 与组织一起发展治理,但独立于项目;(3) 管理所有临床应用;(4) 招生灵活,但决策清晰;(5) 采用分层治理方法;(6)多学科。新出现的原则包括:(1)为每个高优先级计划指派一名IT业务关系经理,(2)为少数决策者提供明确的升级路径,(3)包括为治理提供信息的分析,(4)利用信息学专业知识,以及(5)使用结构化工具来简化流程。结论 虽然不同的医疗保健组织的IT治理非常不同,但许多组织都有一些通用原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IT Department Demand Governance in Health Care: Reflections on a Case Series
Background Little is written on how best to structure IT governance in health care organizations. Governance is challenging because these groups may contain administrators, clinicians, and staff in addition to IT employees; projects may be complex and have significant impact on the teams that provide patient care. Methods Peer organizations in health care were purposefully selected and C-suite executives were interviewed about their IT governance. Notes taken from these conversations were analyzed for guiding principles. Results We interviewed leaders from five peer organizations. Consensus principles included: (1) minimize unwarranted variation; (2) evolve governance with the organization but independently of projects; (3) govern all clinical applications; (4) be flexible with intake, yet clear on decision-making; (5) have a tiered approach to governance; and (6) be multidisciplinary. Emerging principles included: (1) assign an IT business relationship manager to each high priority initiative, (2) have a clear escalation path to a small number of decision-makers, (3) include analytics to inform governance, (4) leverage Informatics expertise, and (5) use structured tools to streamline the process. Conclusion While IT governance is very different across distinct health care organizations, there are some general principles that many share.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信