下议院的持久呼吁

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Dana D. Nelson
{"title":"下议院的持久呼吁","authors":"Dana D. Nelson","doi":"10.1353/ARQ.2019.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Commons are popping up everywhere—internet sites, professional platforms, neighborhood networks, seed banks, time banks, land trusts—everyone wants to be part of one. This essay embraces the argument that good things can come from commoning. But it questions the notion that commons are the key to redeeming all that ails us under the regime of modern capital. It studies some misleading elements of that redemptive framing before mapping out some corrective lessons offered by the history of actually existing civic and natural resource commons schemes, lessons that concern practice, method and theory.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"75 1","pages":"1 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Enduring Appeal of the Commons\",\"authors\":\"Dana D. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ARQ.2019.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Commons are popping up everywhere—internet sites, professional platforms, neighborhood networks, seed banks, time banks, land trusts—everyone wants to be part of one. This essay embraces the argument that good things can come from commoning. But it questions the notion that commons are the key to redeeming all that ails us under the regime of modern capital. It studies some misleading elements of that redemptive framing before mapping out some corrective lessons offered by the history of actually existing civic and natural resource commons schemes, lessons that concern practice, method and theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0009\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:Commons无处不在——互联网网站、专业平台、社区网络、种子银行、时间银行、土地信托——每个人都想成为其中的一员。这篇文章支持这样一种观点,即好的东西可以来自共同。但它质疑了这样一种观点,即在现代资本制度下,公地是拯救所有苦难的关键。它研究了这种救赎框架中的一些误导性因素,然后从实际存在的公民和自然资源共有计划的历史中得出了一些纠正性的教训,这些教训涉及实践、方法和理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Enduring Appeal of the Commons
Abstract:Commons are popping up everywhere—internet sites, professional platforms, neighborhood networks, seed banks, time banks, land trusts—everyone wants to be part of one. This essay embraces the argument that good things can come from commoning. But it questions the notion that commons are the key to redeeming all that ails us under the regime of modern capital. It studies some misleading elements of that redemptive framing before mapping out some corrective lessons offered by the history of actually existing civic and natural resource commons schemes, lessons that concern practice, method and theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信