闭合复位经皮钉扎治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的系统评价

{"title":"闭合复位经皮钉扎治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的系统评价","authors":"","doi":"10.21608/amj.2023.273683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is the second most frequent types of bone injury in children. For treatment of this fracture, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation were two common managements for supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Objective: To review systemically the efficacy of different pin configurations in management of supra condylar humeral fracture in children. Materials and methods: This was a systematic review about supra condylar humeral fracture in children managed by closed reduction and percutaneous pining. The search was conducted by using the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar, PubMed, using the following keywords: \"supracondylar, humerus, children, pinning,\" for published studies from 2010-2020. Result: The carrying angle loss was measured in three studies, 2 used lateral divergent pinning and showed excellent in about 96.6%, good (6.67%), and 1 used medio-lateral entry pin showed excellent (43.75%), good (50%), poor (6.25%), and this showed that lateral divergent pinning had better. As regard mean loss in elbow, extension was 2.4 in lateral divergent pinning, 8.2 in medio-lateral entry pin, 1.7 in lateral pin trans olecranon, and mean Baumann angle loss was 1.3 in lateral divergent pinning, 2.45 in medio-lateral entry pin 4.3 in infrafocal pin. Conclusion: Our review after studying the four type of pinning fixations we found that lateral divergent pinning had better outcome and lower complications. Hence, lateral divergent pinning is the favored procedure.","PeriodicalId":84126,"journal":{"name":"Al Azhar medical journal = Majallat al-Tibb al-Azhar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SUPRA CONDYLAR HUMERAL FRACTURE IN CHILDREN MANAGED BY CLOSED REDUCTION AND PERCUTANEOUS PINNING: REVIEW ARTICLE\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/amj.2023.273683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is the second most frequent types of bone injury in children. For treatment of this fracture, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation were two common managements for supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Objective: To review systemically the efficacy of different pin configurations in management of supra condylar humeral fracture in children. Materials and methods: This was a systematic review about supra condylar humeral fracture in children managed by closed reduction and percutaneous pining. The search was conducted by using the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar, PubMed, using the following keywords: \\\"supracondylar, humerus, children, pinning,\\\" for published studies from 2010-2020. Result: The carrying angle loss was measured in three studies, 2 used lateral divergent pinning and showed excellent in about 96.6%, good (6.67%), and 1 used medio-lateral entry pin showed excellent (43.75%), good (50%), poor (6.25%), and this showed that lateral divergent pinning had better. As regard mean loss in elbow, extension was 2.4 in lateral divergent pinning, 8.2 in medio-lateral entry pin, 1.7 in lateral pin trans olecranon, and mean Baumann angle loss was 1.3 in lateral divergent pinning, 2.45 in medio-lateral entry pin 4.3 in infrafocal pin. Conclusion: Our review after studying the four type of pinning fixations we found that lateral divergent pinning had better outcome and lower complications. Hence, lateral divergent pinning is the favored procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al Azhar medical journal = Majallat al-Tibb al-Azhar\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al Azhar medical journal = Majallat al-Tibb al-Azhar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2023.273683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Azhar medical journal = Majallat al-Tibb al-Azhar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2023.273683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SUPRA CONDYLAR HUMERAL FRACTURE IN CHILDREN MANAGED BY CLOSED REDUCTION AND PERCUTANEOUS PINNING: REVIEW ARTICLE
Background: Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is the second most frequent types of bone injury in children. For treatment of this fracture, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation were two common managements for supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Objective: To review systemically the efficacy of different pin configurations in management of supra condylar humeral fracture in children. Materials and methods: This was a systematic review about supra condylar humeral fracture in children managed by closed reduction and percutaneous pining. The search was conducted by using the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar, PubMed, using the following keywords: "supracondylar, humerus, children, pinning," for published studies from 2010-2020. Result: The carrying angle loss was measured in three studies, 2 used lateral divergent pinning and showed excellent in about 96.6%, good (6.67%), and 1 used medio-lateral entry pin showed excellent (43.75%), good (50%), poor (6.25%), and this showed that lateral divergent pinning had better. As regard mean loss in elbow, extension was 2.4 in lateral divergent pinning, 8.2 in medio-lateral entry pin, 1.7 in lateral pin trans olecranon, and mean Baumann angle loss was 1.3 in lateral divergent pinning, 2.45 in medio-lateral entry pin 4.3 in infrafocal pin. Conclusion: Our review after studying the four type of pinning fixations we found that lateral divergent pinning had better outcome and lower complications. Hence, lateral divergent pinning is the favored procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信