透视国际劳工组织政策:将护理和护理工作重新定义为一种公共产品。欧洲的观测

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
E. Senghaas-Knobloch
{"title":"透视国际劳工组织政策:将护理和护理工作重新定义为一种公共产品。欧洲的观测","authors":"E. Senghaas-Knobloch","doi":"10.1177/14680181221094936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interdisciplinary knowledge about the high relevance of care, care work and the care economy has been produced for many decades. Feminist scholars have long struggled for the recognition of these activities as a vital economic and social contribution to societies. As an unplanned consequence of globalization, liberalization and privatization – the dominant trends in international politics – this relevance has become more visible to a wider audience and politically significant to the International Labour Organization (ILO). Worldwide, it informed new political approaches to reevaluate care activities and care work. The approach of primarily improving individual employment relationships, as important it is, does not seem to be sufficient to bring about decent work in care activities.","PeriodicalId":46041,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ILO policy in perspective: Reframing care and care work as a public good. Observations from Europe\",\"authors\":\"E. Senghaas-Knobloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14680181221094936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interdisciplinary knowledge about the high relevance of care, care work and the care economy has been produced for many decades. Feminist scholars have long struggled for the recognition of these activities as a vital economic and social contribution to societies. As an unplanned consequence of globalization, liberalization and privatization – the dominant trends in international politics – this relevance has become more visible to a wider audience and politically significant to the International Labour Organization (ILO). Worldwide, it informed new political approaches to reevaluate care activities and care work. The approach of primarily improving individual employment relationships, as important it is, does not seem to be sufficient to bring about decent work in care activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Social Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181221094936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181221094936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于护理、护理工作和护理经济的高度相关性的跨学科知识已经产生了几十年。女权主义学者长期以来一直在努力争取承认这些活动是对社会的重要经济和社会贡献。全球化、自由化和私有化是国际政治的主要趋势,这是一个未经计划的结果,这种相关性在更广泛的受众中变得更加明显,在国际劳工组织(劳工组织)中也具有重要的政治意义。在世界范围内,它为重新评估护理活动和护理工作提供了新的政治方法。主要改善个人就业关系的方法,尽管很重要,但似乎不足以在护理活动中带来体面的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ILO policy in perspective: Reframing care and care work as a public good. Observations from Europe
Interdisciplinary knowledge about the high relevance of care, care work and the care economy has been produced for many decades. Feminist scholars have long struggled for the recognition of these activities as a vital economic and social contribution to societies. As an unplanned consequence of globalization, liberalization and privatization – the dominant trends in international politics – this relevance has become more visible to a wider audience and politically significant to the International Labour Organization (ILO). Worldwide, it informed new political approaches to reevaluate care activities and care work. The approach of primarily improving individual employment relationships, as important it is, does not seem to be sufficient to bring about decent work in care activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Social Policy
Global Social Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Global Social Policy is a fully peer-reviewed journal that advances the understanding of the impact of globalisation processes upon social policy and social development on the one hand, and the impact of social policy upon globalisation processes on the other hand. The journal analyses the contributions of a range of national and international actors, both governmental and non-governmental, to global social policy and social development discourse and practice. Global Social Policy publishes scholarly policy-oriented articles and reports that focus on aspects of social policy and social and human development as broadly defined in the context of globalisation be it in contemporary or historical contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信