消费者对替代食品网络可持续性标签的看法

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Birgit Teufer, M. Waiguny, Sonja Grabner‐Kräuter
{"title":"消费者对替代食品网络可持续性标签的看法","authors":"Birgit Teufer, M. Waiguny, Sonja Grabner‐Kräuter","doi":"10.1108/bjm-10-2022-0380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSustainability labels play a crucial role in providing consumers with quick and easily accessible information to assess the environmental, social and economic impacts of products. This research examines how different sustainability labels influence consumer perceptions and assessments of alternative food networks (AFNs).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted three cross-sectional studies to explore consumer perceptions of sustainability labels for AFNs. The authors tested labels representing the three sustainability dimensions, labels of different graphical quality and different awarding bodies.FindingsConsumers did not differentiate between sustainability dimensions but assessed labels in a holistic manner. The overall rating of a label positively influenced perceived sustainability. Self-designed and professionally designed labels had a positive effect on the intention to buy from an AFN. Professionally designed labels also enhanced the perceived authenticity of the networks. Notably, the source of the label, whether self-awarded or awarded by an official body, did not significantly impact consumer perceptions. However, interaction effects revealed professionally designed labels had a stronger positive effect on purchase intention when they were self-awarded.Practical implicationsAFNs can derive benefits from using labels. Self-organized, non-profit AFNs are well advised to have labels professionally designed.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the understanding of the effects of sustainability labels for community-based AFNs, diverging from the traditional focus on individual products.","PeriodicalId":46829,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer perceptions of sustainability labels for alternative food networks\",\"authors\":\"Birgit Teufer, M. Waiguny, Sonja Grabner‐Kräuter\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bjm-10-2022-0380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeSustainability labels play a crucial role in providing consumers with quick and easily accessible information to assess the environmental, social and economic impacts of products. This research examines how different sustainability labels influence consumer perceptions and assessments of alternative food networks (AFNs).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted three cross-sectional studies to explore consumer perceptions of sustainability labels for AFNs. The authors tested labels representing the three sustainability dimensions, labels of different graphical quality and different awarding bodies.FindingsConsumers did not differentiate between sustainability dimensions but assessed labels in a holistic manner. The overall rating of a label positively influenced perceived sustainability. Self-designed and professionally designed labels had a positive effect on the intention to buy from an AFN. Professionally designed labels also enhanced the perceived authenticity of the networks. Notably, the source of the label, whether self-awarded or awarded by an official body, did not significantly impact consumer perceptions. However, interaction effects revealed professionally designed labels had a stronger positive effect on purchase intention when they were self-awarded.Practical implicationsAFNs can derive benefits from using labels. Self-organized, non-profit AFNs are well advised to have labels professionally designed.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the understanding of the effects of sustainability labels for community-based AFNs, diverging from the traditional focus on individual products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-10-2022-0380\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-10-2022-0380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的可持续发展标签在为消费者提供快速方便的信息以评估产品的环境、社会和经济影响方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这项研究考察了不同的可持续性标签如何影响消费者对替代食品网络(AFN)的看法和评估。设计/方法/方法作者进行了三项横断面研究,以探讨消费者对AFN可持续性标签的看法。作者测试了代表三个可持续性维度的标签,不同图形质量的标签和不同的颁奖机构。发现消费者没有区分可持续性维度,而是以整体的方式评估标签。标签的总体评级对感知的可持续性产生了积极影响。自行设计和专业设计的标签对从AFN购买的意愿有积极影响。专业设计的标签也增强了网络的真实性。值得注意的是,标签的来源,无论是自我授予还是官方机构授予,都不会对消费者的看法产生重大影响。然而,互动效应显示,专业设计的标签在自我奖励时对购买意愿有更强的积极影响。实际含义AFN可以从使用标签中获得好处。自我组织的非营利AFN最好有专业设计的标签。独创性/价值这项研究有助于理解可持续性标签对社区AFN的影响,与传统的对单个产品的关注不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consumer perceptions of sustainability labels for alternative food networks
PurposeSustainability labels play a crucial role in providing consumers with quick and easily accessible information to assess the environmental, social and economic impacts of products. This research examines how different sustainability labels influence consumer perceptions and assessments of alternative food networks (AFNs).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted three cross-sectional studies to explore consumer perceptions of sustainability labels for AFNs. The authors tested labels representing the three sustainability dimensions, labels of different graphical quality and different awarding bodies.FindingsConsumers did not differentiate between sustainability dimensions but assessed labels in a holistic manner. The overall rating of a label positively influenced perceived sustainability. Self-designed and professionally designed labels had a positive effect on the intention to buy from an AFN. Professionally designed labels also enhanced the perceived authenticity of the networks. Notably, the source of the label, whether self-awarded or awarded by an official body, did not significantly impact consumer perceptions. However, interaction effects revealed professionally designed labels had a stronger positive effect on purchase intention when they were self-awarded.Practical implicationsAFNs can derive benefits from using labels. Self-organized, non-profit AFNs are well advised to have labels professionally designed.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the understanding of the effects of sustainability labels for community-based AFNs, diverging from the traditional focus on individual products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Baltic region has experienced rapid political and economic change over recent years. The challenges to managers and management researchers operating within the area are often different to those experienced in other parts of the world. The Baltic Journal of Management contributes to an understanding of different management cultures and provides readers with a fresh look at emerging management practices and research in the countries of the Baltic region and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信