利用临床和驾驶模拟器评估来指示成人多发性硬化症驾驶表现缺陷的可行性

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
Sarah Krasniuk, S. Classen, S. Morrow
{"title":"利用临床和驾驶模拟器评估来指示成人多发性硬化症驾驶表现缺陷的可行性","authors":"Sarah Krasniuk, S. Classen, S. Morrow","doi":"10.3233/tad-210367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Drivers with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) experience visual-cognitive impairment that impact on-road driving performance. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the feasibility of utilizing visual-cognitive and driving simulator assessments to indicate driving performance deficits (operational, tactical, and strategic maneuvers) in drivers with MS. METHODS: Through an evidence-informed feasibility framework, we evaluated recruitment capability and resulting sample characteristics, data collection procedures and outcome measures, participants’ acceptability and suitability of the driving simulator, the resources and ability to implement the study, and clinical and driving simulator assessment results. RESULTS: Thirty-eight persons with MS (median age = 43 years, IQR = 19) and 21 persons without MS (median age = 41 years, IQR = 14) participated. Missing data on the driving simulator resulted from scenario complexity (13 with MS, 4 without MS) or the onset of simulator sickness (1 with MS, 1 without MS). Seven participants with MS and two participants without MS reported symptoms of simulator sickness. Participants with MS (vs without MS) made more adjustment to stimuli errors (tactical maneuvers). For participants with MS, immediate verbal/auditory recall or divided/selective attention correlated with simulated driving maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings identified challenges (missing data, simulator sickness), but established feasibility for executing a full-scale study to predict driving simulator performance in drivers with MS.","PeriodicalId":22201,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Disability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of utilizing clinical and driving simulator assessments to indicate driving performance deficits in adults with multiple sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Krasniuk, S. Classen, S. Morrow\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/tad-210367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Drivers with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) experience visual-cognitive impairment that impact on-road driving performance. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the feasibility of utilizing visual-cognitive and driving simulator assessments to indicate driving performance deficits (operational, tactical, and strategic maneuvers) in drivers with MS. METHODS: Through an evidence-informed feasibility framework, we evaluated recruitment capability and resulting sample characteristics, data collection procedures and outcome measures, participants’ acceptability and suitability of the driving simulator, the resources and ability to implement the study, and clinical and driving simulator assessment results. RESULTS: Thirty-eight persons with MS (median age = 43 years, IQR = 19) and 21 persons without MS (median age = 41 years, IQR = 14) participated. Missing data on the driving simulator resulted from scenario complexity (13 with MS, 4 without MS) or the onset of simulator sickness (1 with MS, 1 without MS). Seven participants with MS and two participants without MS reported symptoms of simulator sickness. Participants with MS (vs without MS) made more adjustment to stimuli errors (tactical maneuvers). For participants with MS, immediate verbal/auditory recall or divided/selective attention correlated with simulated driving maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings identified challenges (missing data, simulator sickness), but established feasibility for executing a full-scale study to predict driving simulator performance in drivers with MS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Disability\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-210367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-210367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多发性硬化症(MS)驾驶员的视觉认知障碍会影响道路驾驶性能。目的:本研究考察了利用视觉认知和驾驶模拟器评估来指示MS驾驶员驾驶性能缺陷(操作、战术和战略机动)的可行性。方法:通过证据知情的可行性框架,我们评估了招募能力和由此产生的样本特征,数据收集程序和结果测量,参与者对驾驶模拟器的可接受性和适用性,实施研究的资源和能力,以及临床和驾驶模拟器评估结果。结果:38名多发性硬化症患者(中位年龄=43岁,IQR=19)和21名无多发性痴呆症患者(中位数年龄=41岁,IQR=14)参加了研究。驾驶模拟器上的数据丢失是由于场景复杂性(13例MS,4例无MS)或模拟器疾病的发作(1例MS,1例未MS)造成的。七名患有多发性硬化症的参与者和两名未患多发性痴呆症的参与者报告了模拟器疾病的症状。患有MS的参与者(与没有MS的参与者相比)对刺激错误做出了更多的调整(战术演习)。对于患有多发性硬化症的参与者,即时言语/听觉回忆或分散/选择性注意力与模拟驾驶动作相关。结论:研究结果确定了挑战(数据缺失、模拟器疾病),但确定了进行全面研究以预测MS驾驶员驾驶模拟器性能的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of utilizing clinical and driving simulator assessments to indicate driving performance deficits in adults with multiple sclerosis
BACKGROUND: Drivers with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) experience visual-cognitive impairment that impact on-road driving performance. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the feasibility of utilizing visual-cognitive and driving simulator assessments to indicate driving performance deficits (operational, tactical, and strategic maneuvers) in drivers with MS. METHODS: Through an evidence-informed feasibility framework, we evaluated recruitment capability and resulting sample characteristics, data collection procedures and outcome measures, participants’ acceptability and suitability of the driving simulator, the resources and ability to implement the study, and clinical and driving simulator assessment results. RESULTS: Thirty-eight persons with MS (median age = 43 years, IQR = 19) and 21 persons without MS (median age = 41 years, IQR = 14) participated. Missing data on the driving simulator resulted from scenario complexity (13 with MS, 4 without MS) or the onset of simulator sickness (1 with MS, 1 without MS). Seven participants with MS and two participants without MS reported symptoms of simulator sickness. Participants with MS (vs without MS) made more adjustment to stimuli errors (tactical maneuvers). For participants with MS, immediate verbal/auditory recall or divided/selective attention correlated with simulated driving maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings identified challenges (missing data, simulator sickness), but established feasibility for executing a full-scale study to predict driving simulator performance in drivers with MS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Disability
Technology and Disability Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Technology and Disability communicates knowledge about the field of assistive technology devices and services, within the context of the lives of end users - persons with disabilities and their family members. While the topics are technical in nature, the articles are written for broad comprehension despite the reader"s education or training. Technology and Disability"s contents cover research and development efforts, education and training programs, service and policy activities and consumer experiences. - The term Technology refers to assistive devices and services. - The term Disability refers to both permanent and temporary functional limitations experienced by people of any age within any circumstance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信