保罗在哥林多前书11:27(“……主的身体和血液有罪”)中的指控:不牺牲或不遵守用餐礼仪?

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Petra Dijkhuizen
{"title":"保罗在哥林多前书11:27(“……主的身体和血液有罪”)中的指控:不牺牲或不遵守用餐礼仪?","authors":"Petra Dijkhuizen","doi":"10.1353/neo.2021.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Central to the Pauline teaching on the Lord’s Supper in 1 Corinthians 10–11 are the two food elements, bread and wine (the \"cup\"), signifying the body and blood of the Lord. Two interpretive stances are dominant among exegetes. In respect of the referent \"body,\" adherents to the ecclesiological view interpret it as the group of assembled eaters, whereas those who hold the christological view relate it to the physical or sacramental body of the Lord Christ. This study compares these two perspectives, paying special attention to matters of Vorverständnis and theoretical positioning. The litmus test for interpreters is 1 Corinthians 11:27 where the apostle Paul speaks about guilt concerning \"the body and blood of the Lord.\" It is investigated whether this phrase has multiple referents, whether it harks back to the event of Jesus’s death on the cross, or whether it should refer to the Lord’s sacramental body in the context of a sacrificial meal. The overarching aim of this article is to take away misconceptions about sacrifice in general and partaking of the sacramental body of Christ in particular. It does so through (1) presenting sacrificial rituals as structured and purposive forms of shared behaviour within the dynamics of mimesis and replacement; and (2) presenting the ritual elements of bread and wine as functionally real and organically intricate parts of the sacrificial act as a whole. This study’s conclusion is that Corinth’s meal crisis involved both failure of sacrifice and collapse of social ethics.","PeriodicalId":42126,"journal":{"name":"Neotestamentica","volume":"55 1","pages":"283 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paul’s Charge in 1 Corinthians 11:27 (\\\". . . Guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord\\\"): Failure of Sacrifice or Disregard for Meal Etiquette?\",\"authors\":\"Petra Dijkhuizen\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/neo.2021.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Central to the Pauline teaching on the Lord’s Supper in 1 Corinthians 10–11 are the two food elements, bread and wine (the \\\"cup\\\"), signifying the body and blood of the Lord. Two interpretive stances are dominant among exegetes. In respect of the referent \\\"body,\\\" adherents to the ecclesiological view interpret it as the group of assembled eaters, whereas those who hold the christological view relate it to the physical or sacramental body of the Lord Christ. This study compares these two perspectives, paying special attention to matters of Vorverständnis and theoretical positioning. The litmus test for interpreters is 1 Corinthians 11:27 where the apostle Paul speaks about guilt concerning \\\"the body and blood of the Lord.\\\" It is investigated whether this phrase has multiple referents, whether it harks back to the event of Jesus’s death on the cross, or whether it should refer to the Lord’s sacramental body in the context of a sacrificial meal. The overarching aim of this article is to take away misconceptions about sacrifice in general and partaking of the sacramental body of Christ in particular. It does so through (1) presenting sacrificial rituals as structured and purposive forms of shared behaviour within the dynamics of mimesis and replacement; and (2) presenting the ritual elements of bread and wine as functionally real and organically intricate parts of the sacrificial act as a whole. This study’s conclusion is that Corinth’s meal crisis involved both failure of sacrifice and collapse of social ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neotestamentica\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"283 - 309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neotestamentica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2021.0031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neotestamentica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2021.0031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:波林在哥林多前书10-11中关于主晚餐的教导的核心是两种食物元素,面包和葡萄酒(“杯子”),象征着主的身体和血液。两种解释立场在训词中占主导地位。关于指称的“身体”,信奉教会观的人将其解释为一群聚集的食客,而持基督观的人则将其与主基督的身体或圣礼身体联系起来。本研究比较了这两种观点,特别关注Vorverständnis的问题和理论定位。口译员的试金石是《哥林多前书》11:27,使徒保罗在其中谈到了“主的身体和血液”的罪行。人们调查了这个短语是否有多个指称,它是否让人想起耶稣在十字架上死亡的事件,或者它是否应该在祭祀餐的背景下指代主的圣体。这篇文章的首要目的是消除对一般牺牲的误解,特别是对参与基督圣礼身体的误解。它通过(1)在模仿和替代的动态中,将祭祀仪式呈现为结构化和有目的的共同行为形式;(2)将面包和葡萄酒的仪式元素呈现为整个祭祀活动中功能真实、有机复杂的部分。本研究的结论是,科林斯的膳食危机既涉及牺牲的失败,也涉及社会伦理的崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paul’s Charge in 1 Corinthians 11:27 (". . . Guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord"): Failure of Sacrifice or Disregard for Meal Etiquette?
Abstract:Central to the Pauline teaching on the Lord’s Supper in 1 Corinthians 10–11 are the two food elements, bread and wine (the "cup"), signifying the body and blood of the Lord. Two interpretive stances are dominant among exegetes. In respect of the referent "body," adherents to the ecclesiological view interpret it as the group of assembled eaters, whereas those who hold the christological view relate it to the physical or sacramental body of the Lord Christ. This study compares these two perspectives, paying special attention to matters of Vorverständnis and theoretical positioning. The litmus test for interpreters is 1 Corinthians 11:27 where the apostle Paul speaks about guilt concerning "the body and blood of the Lord." It is investigated whether this phrase has multiple referents, whether it harks back to the event of Jesus’s death on the cross, or whether it should refer to the Lord’s sacramental body in the context of a sacrificial meal. The overarching aim of this article is to take away misconceptions about sacrifice in general and partaking of the sacramental body of Christ in particular. It does so through (1) presenting sacrificial rituals as structured and purposive forms of shared behaviour within the dynamics of mimesis and replacement; and (2) presenting the ritual elements of bread and wine as functionally real and organically intricate parts of the sacrificial act as a whole. This study’s conclusion is that Corinth’s meal crisis involved both failure of sacrifice and collapse of social ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neotestamentica
Neotestamentica RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信