俄罗斯电子商务税收问题及对策

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
L. Polezharova, A. Krasnobaeva
{"title":"俄罗斯电子商务税收问题及对策","authors":"L. Polezharova, A. Krasnobaeva","doi":"10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to describe a mechanism for taxing e-commerce profits of multinational corporations (MNCs). Our research hypothesis is that the new economic reality, where digital transactions are on the rise, requires new mechanisms for taxation of MNCs’ profits. Our research methodology relies on a systemic approach aimed at embracing the complexity and dynamics of the above phenomena. We analyze the feasibility and possible outcomes of the introduction of the indirect digital services tax in Russia, in particular its potential impact on the tax burden distribution and economic growth. Special attention in the article is given to the definition and criteria of virtual permanent establishment. We propose a definition that emphasizes the non-physical nature of permanent establishments in e-commerce and does not include any subjective criteria. Since the Russian tax system is not sufficiently synchronized with the global digital trends, especially regarding taxation of e-commerce profits of tech giants, which means that the introduction of a digital services tax in Russia may be premature due to its possible negative influence on the tax burden redistribution, competition, business profitability, employment, personal income and innovation. Russia will be able to participate in the process of allocation of MNCs’ profits if the mechanism of direct taxation is developed and the institution of virtual permanent establishment is introduced into the national tax legislation. These measures will enable the Russian state to realize its taxing rights in relation to MNC’s profits and benefit from the international trends in profit-allocation. Our critical analysis of the OECD’s unified approach has shown its weaknesses and led us to the conclusion that a simple and more transparent taxation mechanism is necessary based on the formulary apportionment of MNCs’ total revenues rather than residual profits among the relevant jurisdictions. In our view, Russia should move ahead with the unilateral measures for taxation of MNCs in accordance with the mechanism described above. Unlike the majority of research, we propose to use only objective value indicators, which cannot be distorted by subjective interpretations, and exclude the risk degree indicator from the set of allocation keys. It also makes sense to use a formula for allocation of profit among the countries rather than corporate structures, as it will enable tax authorities to take into account the impact of federal and regional tax preferences to investors. For citation Polezharova L.V., Krasnobaeva A.M. E-Commerce Taxation in Russia: Problems and Approaches. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020;6(2):104–123. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077. Article info Received June 3, 2020; Revised July 9, 2020; Accepted August 8, 2020","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":"6 1","pages":"104-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-Commerce Taxation in Russia: Problems and Approaches\",\"authors\":\"L. Polezharova, A. Krasnobaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to describe a mechanism for taxing e-commerce profits of multinational corporations (MNCs). Our research hypothesis is that the new economic reality, where digital transactions are on the rise, requires new mechanisms for taxation of MNCs’ profits. Our research methodology relies on a systemic approach aimed at embracing the complexity and dynamics of the above phenomena. We analyze the feasibility and possible outcomes of the introduction of the indirect digital services tax in Russia, in particular its potential impact on the tax burden distribution and economic growth. Special attention in the article is given to the definition and criteria of virtual permanent establishment. We propose a definition that emphasizes the non-physical nature of permanent establishments in e-commerce and does not include any subjective criteria. Since the Russian tax system is not sufficiently synchronized with the global digital trends, especially regarding taxation of e-commerce profits of tech giants, which means that the introduction of a digital services tax in Russia may be premature due to its possible negative influence on the tax burden redistribution, competition, business profitability, employment, personal income and innovation. Russia will be able to participate in the process of allocation of MNCs’ profits if the mechanism of direct taxation is developed and the institution of virtual permanent establishment is introduced into the national tax legislation. These measures will enable the Russian state to realize its taxing rights in relation to MNC’s profits and benefit from the international trends in profit-allocation. Our critical analysis of the OECD’s unified approach has shown its weaknesses and led us to the conclusion that a simple and more transparent taxation mechanism is necessary based on the formulary apportionment of MNCs’ total revenues rather than residual profits among the relevant jurisdictions. In our view, Russia should move ahead with the unilateral measures for taxation of MNCs in accordance with the mechanism described above. Unlike the majority of research, we propose to use only objective value indicators, which cannot be distorted by subjective interpretations, and exclude the risk degree indicator from the set of allocation keys. It also makes sense to use a formula for allocation of profit among the countries rather than corporate structures, as it will enable tax authorities to take into account the impact of federal and regional tax preferences to investors. For citation Polezharova L.V., Krasnobaeva A.M. E-Commerce Taxation in Russia: Problems and Approaches. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020;6(2):104–123. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077. Article info Received June 3, 2020; Revised July 9, 2020; Accepted August 8, 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":53924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tax Reform\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"104-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tax Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文的目的是描述一种对跨国公司电子商务利润征税的机制。我们的研究假设是,数字交易正在增长的新经济现实需要对跨国公司利润征税的新机制。我们的研究方法依赖于一种系统的方法,旨在包容上述现象的复杂性和动态性。我们分析了在俄罗斯引入间接数字服务税的可行性和可能结果,特别是其对税负分配和经济增长的潜在影响。文章特别注意虚拟常设机构的定义和标准。我们提出的定义强调电子商务常设机构的非实体性质,不包括任何主观标准。由于俄罗斯的税收制度与全球数字趋势没有充分同步,特别是在对科技巨头的电子商务利润征税方面,这意味着在俄罗斯引入数字服务税可能为时过早,因为它可能会对税收负担再分配、竞争、商业盈利能力、就业、,个人收入和创新。如果建立直接税机制并将虚拟常设机构制度引入国家税收立法,俄罗斯将能够参与跨国公司利润的分配过程。这些措施将使俄罗斯政府能够实现其对跨国公司利润的征税权,并从利润分配的国际趋势中受益。我们对经合组织统一方法的批判性分析显示了其弱点,并使我们得出结论,基于跨国公司总收入而非剩余利润在相关司法管辖区之间的公式化分配,有必要建立一个简单、更透明的税收机制。我们认为,俄罗斯应根据上述机制推进对跨国公司征税的单方面措施。与大多数研究不同,我们建议只使用客观价值指标,而客观价值指标不能被主观解释所扭曲,并将风险程度指标排除在分配关键集合之外。使用国家间利润分配公式而不是公司结构也是有意义的,因为这将使税务机关能够考虑联邦和地区税收优惠对投资者的影响。引用Polezharova L.V.,Krasnobaeva A.M.俄罗斯电子商务税收:问题和方法。税务改革杂志。2020年;6(2):104–123。DOI:10.15826/jtr.20206.2.077。文章信息接收日期:2020年6月3日;修订日期:2020年7月9日;接受日期:2020年8月8日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E-Commerce Taxation in Russia: Problems and Approaches
The purpose of this article is to describe a mechanism for taxing e-commerce profits of multinational corporations (MNCs). Our research hypothesis is that the new economic reality, where digital transactions are on the rise, requires new mechanisms for taxation of MNCs’ profits. Our research methodology relies on a systemic approach aimed at embracing the complexity and dynamics of the above phenomena. We analyze the feasibility and possible outcomes of the introduction of the indirect digital services tax in Russia, in particular its potential impact on the tax burden distribution and economic growth. Special attention in the article is given to the definition and criteria of virtual permanent establishment. We propose a definition that emphasizes the non-physical nature of permanent establishments in e-commerce and does not include any subjective criteria. Since the Russian tax system is not sufficiently synchronized with the global digital trends, especially regarding taxation of e-commerce profits of tech giants, which means that the introduction of a digital services tax in Russia may be premature due to its possible negative influence on the tax burden redistribution, competition, business profitability, employment, personal income and innovation. Russia will be able to participate in the process of allocation of MNCs’ profits if the mechanism of direct taxation is developed and the institution of virtual permanent establishment is introduced into the national tax legislation. These measures will enable the Russian state to realize its taxing rights in relation to MNC’s profits and benefit from the international trends in profit-allocation. Our critical analysis of the OECD’s unified approach has shown its weaknesses and led us to the conclusion that a simple and more transparent taxation mechanism is necessary based on the formulary apportionment of MNCs’ total revenues rather than residual profits among the relevant jurisdictions. In our view, Russia should move ahead with the unilateral measures for taxation of MNCs in accordance with the mechanism described above. Unlike the majority of research, we propose to use only objective value indicators, which cannot be distorted by subjective interpretations, and exclude the risk degree indicator from the set of allocation keys. It also makes sense to use a formula for allocation of profit among the countries rather than corporate structures, as it will enable tax authorities to take into account the impact of federal and regional tax preferences to investors. For citation Polezharova L.V., Krasnobaeva A.M. E-Commerce Taxation in Russia: Problems and Approaches. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020;6(2):104–123. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077. Article info Received June 3, 2020; Revised July 9, 2020; Accepted August 8, 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信