中底产品缺陷的模糊风险优先数评估

E. Krisnaningsih, Arif Budi Sulistyo, Abdul Rahim, Saleh Dwiyatno
{"title":"中底产品缺陷的模糊风险优先数评估","authors":"E. Krisnaningsih, Arif Budi Sulistyo, Abdul Rahim, Saleh Dwiyatno","doi":"10.30656/jsmi.v6i1.4013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of midsole products significantly impacts the quality, durability, and comfort of the users of shoe products manufactured by ABC company. The high percentage of the average number of product defects based on product yield data for 12 months is 3.1% which exceeds the average number of product defects required by the company by 2%. There are six types of defects in the midsole: yellowing, porous, bubbles, broken, over left material and trimming. Three types of midsole product defects from six types of defects are the focus of improvement based on the Pareto concept, the name of the type of defect is yellowing. Porous and over left material with a total defect percentage of 82.9%. This study aims to evaluate flaws in the midsole production process using a method that combines failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), fuzzy logic, and Pareto diagram analysis. FMEA is used in shoe manufacturing to identify failure modes, their causes, and their effects. In contrast, fuzzy logic methods for input factors, such as occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D), are used to obtain a fuzzy risk priority number (FRPN). The assessment using rule-based FRPN provides strong evidence that the proposed methodology is logically useful for prioritizing the value of the RPN.","PeriodicalId":53057,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy risk priority number assessment to detect midsole product defects\",\"authors\":\"E. Krisnaningsih, Arif Budi Sulistyo, Abdul Rahim, Saleh Dwiyatno\",\"doi\":\"10.30656/jsmi.v6i1.4013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quality of midsole products significantly impacts the quality, durability, and comfort of the users of shoe products manufactured by ABC company. The high percentage of the average number of product defects based on product yield data for 12 months is 3.1% which exceeds the average number of product defects required by the company by 2%. There are six types of defects in the midsole: yellowing, porous, bubbles, broken, over left material and trimming. Three types of midsole product defects from six types of defects are the focus of improvement based on the Pareto concept, the name of the type of defect is yellowing. Porous and over left material with a total defect percentage of 82.9%. This study aims to evaluate flaws in the midsole production process using a method that combines failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), fuzzy logic, and Pareto diagram analysis. FMEA is used in shoe manufacturing to identify failure modes, their causes, and their effects. In contrast, fuzzy logic methods for input factors, such as occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D), are used to obtain a fuzzy risk priority number (FRPN). The assessment using rule-based FRPN provides strong evidence that the proposed methodology is logically useful for prioritizing the value of the RPN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v6i1.4013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v6i1.4013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

中底产品的质量对ABC公司生产的鞋产品的质量、耐用性和使用者的舒适性产生了重大影响。基于12个月的产品产量数据,平均产品缺陷数量的高百分比为3.1%,超过了公司要求的平均产品缺陷数的2%。中底有六种类型的缺陷:发黄、多孔、气泡、断裂、材料残留过多和修剪。中底产品的三类缺陷是从六类缺陷中改进的重点,基于Pareto概念,该类缺陷的名称是发黄。多孔和遗留过多的材料,总缺陷率为82.9%。本研究旨在使用故障模式与影响分析(FMEA)、模糊逻辑和帕累托图分析相结合的方法来评估中底生产过程中的缺陷。FMEA用于鞋类制造,以识别故障模式、原因及其影响。相反,输入因素的模糊逻辑方法,如发生率(O)、严重性(S)和检测率(D),用于获得模糊风险优先数(FRPN)。使用基于规则的FRPN的评估提供了强有力的证据,证明所提出的方法在逻辑上对RPN的价值排序是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy risk priority number assessment to detect midsole product defects
The quality of midsole products significantly impacts the quality, durability, and comfort of the users of shoe products manufactured by ABC company. The high percentage of the average number of product defects based on product yield data for 12 months is 3.1% which exceeds the average number of product defects required by the company by 2%. There are six types of defects in the midsole: yellowing, porous, bubbles, broken, over left material and trimming. Three types of midsole product defects from six types of defects are the focus of improvement based on the Pareto concept, the name of the type of defect is yellowing. Porous and over left material with a total defect percentage of 82.9%. This study aims to evaluate flaws in the midsole production process using a method that combines failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), fuzzy logic, and Pareto diagram analysis. FMEA is used in shoe manufacturing to identify failure modes, their causes, and their effects. In contrast, fuzzy logic methods for input factors, such as occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D), are used to obtain a fuzzy risk priority number (FRPN). The assessment using rule-based FRPN provides strong evidence that the proposed methodology is logically useful for prioritizing the value of the RPN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信