{"title":"托克维尔的新政治学在旧政治学的阴影下","authors":"Cheryl B. Welch","doi":"10.3138/TTR.40.1.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article explicates Tocqueville's famous assertion that \"a new political science is needed for a world entirely new\" by drawing a contrast with the old political science to be superseded. Part One establishes the evidence, contextual and textual, for the claim that the old political science to which Tocqueville refers is the Enlightenment project as interpreted by the selfproclaimed heirs of the philosophes in the revolutionary generation: the Idéologues. Part Two argues that taking this foil seriously allows us to see the novelties associated with Tocqueville's new democratic political science: the ways in which he hoped to avoid the dangerous temptations and seductions of the old and his subtle moralized interpretation of intérêt bien entendu. Much impressive recent scholarship recovers the importance of Tocqueville's aristocratic interlocutors; this article argues that he was also in veiled conversation with liberals of a particularly democratic and utilitarian kind, and that he self-consciously adopted their idealism and assumed their mantle.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"185 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tocqueville's New Political Science in the Shadow of the Old\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl B. Welch\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/TTR.40.1.185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article explicates Tocqueville's famous assertion that \\\"a new political science is needed for a world entirely new\\\" by drawing a contrast with the old political science to be superseded. Part One establishes the evidence, contextual and textual, for the claim that the old political science to which Tocqueville refers is the Enlightenment project as interpreted by the selfproclaimed heirs of the philosophes in the revolutionary generation: the Idéologues. Part Two argues that taking this foil seriously allows us to see the novelties associated with Tocqueville's new democratic political science: the ways in which he hoped to avoid the dangerous temptations and seductions of the old and his subtle moralized interpretation of intérêt bien entendu. Much impressive recent scholarship recovers the importance of Tocqueville's aristocratic interlocutors; this article argues that he was also in veiled conversation with liberals of a particularly democratic and utilitarian kind, and that he self-consciously adopted their idealism and assumed their mantle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"185 - 211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.40.1.185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.40.1.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文通过与被取代的旧政治学的对比,阐述了托克维尔“一个全新的世界需要一门新的政治学”的著名论断。第一部分为托克维尔所指的旧政治学是启蒙运动项目的说法提供了上下文和文本证据,正如革命一代哲学的自封继承人所解释的那样:哲学。第二部分认为,认真对待这种陪衬可以让我们看到与托克维尔的新民主政治学相关的新颖之处:他希望避免旧的危险诱惑和诱惑的方式,以及他对intérêt bien entendu的微妙道德化解释。最近令人印象深刻的学术研究恢复了托克维尔贵族对话者的重要性;这篇文章认为,他也在与一种特别民主和功利的自由主义者进行隐蔽的对话,他自觉地接受了他们的理想主义,并接过了他们的衣钵。
Tocqueville's New Political Science in the Shadow of the Old
Abstract:This article explicates Tocqueville's famous assertion that "a new political science is needed for a world entirely new" by drawing a contrast with the old political science to be superseded. Part One establishes the evidence, contextual and textual, for the claim that the old political science to which Tocqueville refers is the Enlightenment project as interpreted by the selfproclaimed heirs of the philosophes in the revolutionary generation: the Idéologues. Part Two argues that taking this foil seriously allows us to see the novelties associated with Tocqueville's new democratic political science: the ways in which he hoped to avoid the dangerous temptations and seductions of the old and his subtle moralized interpretation of intérêt bien entendu. Much impressive recent scholarship recovers the importance of Tocqueville's aristocratic interlocutors; this article argues that he was also in veiled conversation with liberals of a particularly democratic and utilitarian kind, and that he self-consciously adopted their idealism and assumed their mantle.