“美元与听众”:重新审视新西兰广播市场放松管制的伟大实验

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION
R. McEwan, M. Mollgaard
{"title":"“美元与听众”:重新审视新西兰广播市场放松管制的伟大实验","authors":"R. McEwan, M. Mollgaard","doi":"10.1080/19376529.2020.1854757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT During the 1980s New Zealand embarked on a neoliberal project to deregulate as much of the economy as possible. This deregulation included media systems, with radio broadcasting one of the most thoroughly reformed sectors. Critiques of these significant changes and their wide-reaching outcomes were articulated by scholars and pundits from early in the process, reaching a zenith in 2005 with the publication of a book focused on the impact of the deregulation of New Zealand radio titled The Great New Zealand Radio Experiment. This article accepts a key challenge from this volume to interrogate the deregulated commercial radio market in terms of delivering both “dollars and listeners” in years to come. Thirty years on from deregulation and 15 years since this key critical publication, we find that commercial radio in New Zealand has managed to both keep significant listenership and to hold its share of advertising revenue, despite the misgivings of earlier scholarship. This article revisits the deregulation debate and examines the strategies that commercial radio has used to remain relevant to audiences and advertisers and to survive and thrive in the digital age.","PeriodicalId":44611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radio & Audio Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19376529.2020.1854757","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Dollars and Listeners”: Revisiting the Great New Zealand Radio Experiment of Market Deregulation\",\"authors\":\"R. McEwan, M. Mollgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19376529.2020.1854757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT During the 1980s New Zealand embarked on a neoliberal project to deregulate as much of the economy as possible. This deregulation included media systems, with radio broadcasting one of the most thoroughly reformed sectors. Critiques of these significant changes and their wide-reaching outcomes were articulated by scholars and pundits from early in the process, reaching a zenith in 2005 with the publication of a book focused on the impact of the deregulation of New Zealand radio titled The Great New Zealand Radio Experiment. This article accepts a key challenge from this volume to interrogate the deregulated commercial radio market in terms of delivering both “dollars and listeners” in years to come. Thirty years on from deregulation and 15 years since this key critical publication, we find that commercial radio in New Zealand has managed to both keep significant listenership and to hold its share of advertising revenue, despite the misgivings of earlier scholarship. This article revisits the deregulation debate and examines the strategies that commercial radio has used to remain relevant to audiences and advertisers and to survive and thrive in the digital age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radio & Audio Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19376529.2020.1854757\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radio & Audio Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2020.1854757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radio & Audio Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2020.1854757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要20世纪80年代,新西兰开始了一项新自由主义项目,以尽可能多地放松对经济的管制。这种放松管制包括媒体系统,无线电广播是改革最彻底的部门之一。在这一过程的早期,学者和权威人士就对这些重大变化及其广泛影响的结果提出了批评,2005年出版了一本名为《伟大的新西兰无线电实验》的书,重点讨论了新西兰无线电放松管制的影响,达到了顶峰。这篇文章接受了本卷的一个关键挑战,即在未来几年里,从提供“美元和听众”的角度来质疑放松管制的商业广播市场。放松管制30年过去了,这本关键的批评性出版物出版15年了,我们发现,尽管对早期的奖学金心存疑虑,但新西兰的商业电台既保持了大量听众,又保持了广告收入的份额。这篇文章重新审视了放松管制的辩论,并探讨了商业电台用来保持与观众和广告商的相关性,以及在数字时代生存和繁荣的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Dollars and Listeners”: Revisiting the Great New Zealand Radio Experiment of Market Deregulation
ABSTRACT During the 1980s New Zealand embarked on a neoliberal project to deregulate as much of the economy as possible. This deregulation included media systems, with radio broadcasting one of the most thoroughly reformed sectors. Critiques of these significant changes and their wide-reaching outcomes were articulated by scholars and pundits from early in the process, reaching a zenith in 2005 with the publication of a book focused on the impact of the deregulation of New Zealand radio titled The Great New Zealand Radio Experiment. This article accepts a key challenge from this volume to interrogate the deregulated commercial radio market in terms of delivering both “dollars and listeners” in years to come. Thirty years on from deregulation and 15 years since this key critical publication, we find that commercial radio in New Zealand has managed to both keep significant listenership and to hold its share of advertising revenue, despite the misgivings of earlier scholarship. This article revisits the deregulation debate and examines the strategies that commercial radio has used to remain relevant to audiences and advertisers and to survive and thrive in the digital age.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信