{"title":"关于瓦罗和西塞罗的拼写和发音:澄清","authors":"Federico Biddau","doi":"10.1515/joll-2019-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract After taking into account the points stressed by Dr. Biddau, I will show that he misinterpreted Varro, Ling. 9.80 and Cic. De orat. 45–46, two basic references of his discussion, and that he did not consider Cicero’s whole passage. On the other hand, he did not focus on the epigraphic situation at all, as it has been described recently by Adams (2007. The regional diversification of Latin 200 BC–AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.). Therefore, I reject as substantially ungrounded his criticism.","PeriodicalId":29862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin Linguistics","volume":"19 1","pages":"135 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/joll-2019-0006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Varro’s and Cicero’s spelling and pronunciation: A clarification\",\"authors\":\"Federico Biddau\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/joll-2019-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract After taking into account the points stressed by Dr. Biddau, I will show that he misinterpreted Varro, Ling. 9.80 and Cic. De orat. 45–46, two basic references of his discussion, and that he did not consider Cicero’s whole passage. On the other hand, he did not focus on the epigraphic situation at all, as it has been described recently by Adams (2007. The regional diversification of Latin 200 BC–AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.). Therefore, I reject as substantially ungrounded his criticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Latin Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"135 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/joll-2019-0006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Latin Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2019-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2019-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Varro’s and Cicero’s spelling and pronunciation: A clarification
Abstract After taking into account the points stressed by Dr. Biddau, I will show that he misinterpreted Varro, Ling. 9.80 and Cic. De orat. 45–46, two basic references of his discussion, and that he did not consider Cicero’s whole passage. On the other hand, he did not focus on the epigraphic situation at all, as it has been described recently by Adams (2007. The regional diversification of Latin 200 BC–AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.). Therefore, I reject as substantially ungrounded his criticism.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
