{"title":"发布、解释、理解和遵守:简明语言的立法","authors":"Germán J. Arenas Arias","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2023.2182980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to systematize the political practice of three initiatives related to the concept of plain language on the Latin-American legislative arena. On the one hand, I explore part of literature on legislative studies to account for one of the communicative limits faced by legislation (Xanthaki, 2010, 2019) and on the other, present the instrumental nature of plain language to overcome this limit and achieve the widest possible dissemination of legislative messages for lay audiences. The work is based on a descriptive-analytical review of three public initiatives that inhabit three Latin America countries that, in turn, have in common a collective phenomenon called «Plain Language Networks». These Networks involve the parliaments of each country, and they are implementing (or have implemented) a very similar initiative: ‘Ley Fácil’ (Chile), ‘Ley Simple’ (Argentina) and ‘La ley en tu lenguaje’ (Uruguay). The paper draws, methodologically, on the results of a questionnaire sent to those responsible for the three initiatives, designed to understand their implementation in greater depth. Arguably, the initiatives are aimed and are framed by principles of open parliament, institutional strengthening, transparency, trust, and citizen participatory; my argument is that Ley Fácil (‘Eays Law’ (Chile)), Ley Simple (‘Simple Law’ (Argentina)) and La Ley en tu lenguaje (‘Law in your Language’ (Uruguay)) are, essentially, political pedagogy tools to increase the «ability of people to (i) access and (ii) understand the laws that govern their lives» (Roznai & Mordechay, 2016).","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publish, explain, understand, and comply: Legislation in Plain Language\",\"authors\":\"Germán J. Arenas Arias\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20508840.2023.2182980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to systematize the political practice of three initiatives related to the concept of plain language on the Latin-American legislative arena. On the one hand, I explore part of literature on legislative studies to account for one of the communicative limits faced by legislation (Xanthaki, 2010, 2019) and on the other, present the instrumental nature of plain language to overcome this limit and achieve the widest possible dissemination of legislative messages for lay audiences. The work is based on a descriptive-analytical review of three public initiatives that inhabit three Latin America countries that, in turn, have in common a collective phenomenon called «Plain Language Networks». These Networks involve the parliaments of each country, and they are implementing (or have implemented) a very similar initiative: ‘Ley Fácil’ (Chile), ‘Ley Simple’ (Argentina) and ‘La ley en tu lenguaje’ (Uruguay). The paper draws, methodologically, on the results of a questionnaire sent to those responsible for the three initiatives, designed to understand their implementation in greater depth. Arguably, the initiatives are aimed and are framed by principles of open parliament, institutional strengthening, transparency, trust, and citizen participatory; my argument is that Ley Fácil (‘Eays Law’ (Chile)), Ley Simple (‘Simple Law’ (Argentina)) and La Ley en tu lenguaje (‘Law in your Language’ (Uruguay)) are, essentially, political pedagogy tools to increase the «ability of people to (i) access and (ii) understand the laws that govern their lives» (Roznai & Mordechay, 2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2023.2182980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2023.2182980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文旨在系统化拉丁美洲立法舞台上与简明语言概念相关的三项倡议的政治实践。一方面,我探索了关于立法研究的部分文献,以解释立法面临的交流限制之一(Xanthaki,20102019),另一方面,介绍了通俗语言的工具性,以克服这一限制,并为非专业受众尽可能广泛地传播立法信息。这项工作是基于对居住在三个拉丁美洲国家的三项公共倡议的描述性分析审查,而这三个国家又有一个共同的现象,称为“简明语言网络”。这些网络涉及每个国家的议会,它们正在实施(或已经实施)一项非常类似的倡议:“Ley Fácil”(智利)、“Ley Simple”(阿根廷)和“La Ley en tu lenguaje”(乌拉圭)。该文件从方法上借鉴了向三项举措负责人发送的问卷调查结果,旨在更深入地了解这些举措的执行情况。可以说,这些举措的目标是公开议会、加强体制、透明、信任和公民参与的原则;我的论点是,Ley Fácil(“ays Law”(智利))、Ley Simple(“Simple Law”)(阿根廷)和La Ley en tu lenguaje(“你的语言中的法律”(乌拉圭))本质上是提高“人们(i)接触和(ii)理解支配他们生活的法律的能力”的政治教育学工具(Roznai和Mordecay,2016)。
Publish, explain, understand, and comply: Legislation in Plain Language
ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to systematize the political practice of three initiatives related to the concept of plain language on the Latin-American legislative arena. On the one hand, I explore part of literature on legislative studies to account for one of the communicative limits faced by legislation (Xanthaki, 2010, 2019) and on the other, present the instrumental nature of plain language to overcome this limit and achieve the widest possible dissemination of legislative messages for lay audiences. The work is based on a descriptive-analytical review of three public initiatives that inhabit three Latin America countries that, in turn, have in common a collective phenomenon called «Plain Language Networks». These Networks involve the parliaments of each country, and they are implementing (or have implemented) a very similar initiative: ‘Ley Fácil’ (Chile), ‘Ley Simple’ (Argentina) and ‘La ley en tu lenguaje’ (Uruguay). The paper draws, methodologically, on the results of a questionnaire sent to those responsible for the three initiatives, designed to understand their implementation in greater depth. Arguably, the initiatives are aimed and are framed by principles of open parliament, institutional strengthening, transparency, trust, and citizen participatory; my argument is that Ley Fácil (‘Eays Law’ (Chile)), Ley Simple (‘Simple Law’ (Argentina)) and La Ley en tu lenguaje (‘Law in your Language’ (Uruguay)) are, essentially, political pedagogy tools to increase the «ability of people to (i) access and (ii) understand the laws that govern their lives» (Roznai & Mordechay, 2016).
期刊介绍:
The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.