评估在行动。对Ricœur早期伦理学的现象学再评价

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Emanuele Caminada
{"title":"评估在行动。对Ricœur早期伦理学的现象学再评价","authors":"Emanuele Caminada","doi":"10.1080/00071773.2021.1941159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With a phenomenological reassessment of Ricœur’s early ethics, I expound on the role played by evaluation in shaping intentions in the course of action. Ricœur’s early ethics can be considered an “extended theory of action” because it addresses human doing beyond the paradigm of well-formed intentions. Focusing on The Voluntary and the Involuntary, I will (1) consider his inquiry under the lens of his critique of early-phenomenological meta-ethics by discussing his view that evaluation isolates itself from consciousness’s constitutive tension toward action; (2) highlight the existential motives of his later hermeneutic turn which latently motivate his early philosophical project: the formation of intentions arises in a biographical and historical context, and only gradually becomes conscious from the agent’s perspective. (3) pinpoint how Ricœur identifies an entanglement with the circle of conviction in the structure of commitment, by enlarging the scope to his reading of Landsberg.","PeriodicalId":44348,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":"53 1","pages":"145 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00071773.2021.1941159","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation in Action. A Phenomenological Reassessment of Ricœur’s Early Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Caminada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00071773.2021.1941159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT With a phenomenological reassessment of Ricœur’s early ethics, I expound on the role played by evaluation in shaping intentions in the course of action. Ricœur’s early ethics can be considered an “extended theory of action” because it addresses human doing beyond the paradigm of well-formed intentions. Focusing on The Voluntary and the Involuntary, I will (1) consider his inquiry under the lens of his critique of early-phenomenological meta-ethics by discussing his view that evaluation isolates itself from consciousness’s constitutive tension toward action; (2) highlight the existential motives of his later hermeneutic turn which latently motivate his early philosophical project: the formation of intentions arises in a biographical and historical context, and only gradually becomes conscious from the agent’s perspective. (3) pinpoint how Ricœur identifies an entanglement with the circle of conviction in the structure of commitment, by enlarging the scope to his reading of Landsberg.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00071773.2021.1941159\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2021.1941159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2021.1941159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要通过对Ricœur早期伦理学的现象学重新评估,我阐述了评价在行动过程中塑造意图的作用。Ricœur的早期伦理学可以被认为是一种“扩展的行动理论”,因为它超越了既定意图的范式来处理人类的行为。以《自愿与非自愿》为中心,我将(1)从他对早期现象学元伦理学的批判的视角来思考他的探究,讨论他的观点,即评价将自己与意识对行动的构成张力隔离开来;(2) 强调了他后期解释学转向的存在动机,这些动机潜在地激励了他早期的哲学项目:意图的形成是在传记和历史背景下产生的,只是从代理人的角度逐渐变得有意识。(3) 通过扩大对兰茨贝格的阅读范围,明确Ricœur是如何在承诺结构中识别与信念圈的纠缠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation in Action. A Phenomenological Reassessment of Ricœur’s Early Ethics
ABSTRACT With a phenomenological reassessment of Ricœur’s early ethics, I expound on the role played by evaluation in shaping intentions in the course of action. Ricœur’s early ethics can be considered an “extended theory of action” because it addresses human doing beyond the paradigm of well-formed intentions. Focusing on The Voluntary and the Involuntary, I will (1) consider his inquiry under the lens of his critique of early-phenomenological meta-ethics by discussing his view that evaluation isolates itself from consciousness’s constitutive tension toward action; (2) highlight the existential motives of his later hermeneutic turn which latently motivate his early philosophical project: the formation of intentions arises in a biographical and historical context, and only gradually becomes conscious from the agent’s perspective. (3) pinpoint how Ricœur identifies an entanglement with the circle of conviction in the structure of commitment, by enlarging the scope to his reading of Landsberg.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信