引发反社会命题:玛吉·纳尔逊《阿尔戈人》中的怀孕问题

Q3 Social Sciences
Tyler Carson
{"title":"引发反社会命题:玛吉·纳尔逊《阿尔戈人》中的怀孕问题","authors":"Tyler Carson","doi":"10.1080/15240657.2021.1883848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The vexed debate within the field of queer theory over what it means to be queer in the social world—the anti-social thesis—serves as this article’s conceptual and theoretical starting point, but also is that which, as I argue, The Argonauts seeks to disrupt. This article thereby mobilizes Nelson’s autobiographical memoir to question whether a departure from privileging only these negative modes of being—anti-sociality—is in order. I argue that The Argonauts offers three exciting lines of flight that build upon and extend contemporary debates in queer theory: (a) the queerness of pregnancy as a self-shattering experience; (b) the experience of becoming undone alongside one another; and (c) the queer ordinary as the lifelong task of finding spaces—whether they be political, cultural, or interpersonal—that are “good enough.”","PeriodicalId":39339,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15240657.2021.1883848","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engendering the Anti-Social Thesis: The Queerness of Pregnancy in Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts\",\"authors\":\"Tyler Carson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15240657.2021.1883848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The vexed debate within the field of queer theory over what it means to be queer in the social world—the anti-social thesis—serves as this article’s conceptual and theoretical starting point, but also is that which, as I argue, The Argonauts seeks to disrupt. This article thereby mobilizes Nelson’s autobiographical memoir to question whether a departure from privileging only these negative modes of being—anti-sociality—is in order. I argue that The Argonauts offers three exciting lines of flight that build upon and extend contemporary debates in queer theory: (a) the queerness of pregnancy as a self-shattering experience; (b) the experience of becoming undone alongside one another; and (c) the queer ordinary as the lifelong task of finding spaces—whether they be political, cultural, or interpersonal—that are “good enough.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":39339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15240657.2021.1883848\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1883848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1883848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要酷儿理论领域内关于在社会世界中成为酷儿意味着什么的争论——反社会论文——是本文的概念和理论起点,但正如我所说,这也是《阿尔戈人》试图打破的。因此,这篇文章调动了纳尔逊的自传体回忆录,质疑是否应该放弃只赋予这些消极的存在模式——反社会——特权。我认为,《阿尔戈人》提供了三条令人兴奋的飞行路线,这些路线建立并扩展了当代酷儿理论的辩论:(a)怀孕是一种自我毁灭的体验;(b) 与他人并肩作战的经历;以及(c)酷儿的平凡,作为寻找“足够好”的空间的终身任务——无论是政治、文化还是人际关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engendering the Anti-Social Thesis: The Queerness of Pregnancy in Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts
ABSTRACT The vexed debate within the field of queer theory over what it means to be queer in the social world—the anti-social thesis—serves as this article’s conceptual and theoretical starting point, but also is that which, as I argue, The Argonauts seeks to disrupt. This article thereby mobilizes Nelson’s autobiographical memoir to question whether a departure from privileging only these negative modes of being—anti-sociality—is in order. I argue that The Argonauts offers three exciting lines of flight that build upon and extend contemporary debates in queer theory: (a) the queerness of pregnancy as a self-shattering experience; (b) the experience of becoming undone alongside one another; and (c) the queer ordinary as the lifelong task of finding spaces—whether they be political, cultural, or interpersonal—that are “good enough.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Gender and Sexuality
Studies in Gender and Sexuality Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Beginning in the final two decades of the 20th century, the study of gender and sexuality has been revived from a variety of directions: the traditions of feminist scholarship, postclassical and postmodern psychoanalytic theory, developmental research, and cultural studies have all contributed to renewed fascination with those powerfully formative aspects of subjectivity that fall within the rubric of "gender" and "sexuality." Clinicians, for their part, have returned to gender and sexuality with heightened sensitivity to the role of these constructs in the treatment situation, including the richly variegated ways in which assumptions about gender and sexuality enter into our understandings of "normality" and "pathology."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信