联合国安理会对利比亚的制裁和调解

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
C. Portela, Jean-Louis Romanet Perroux
{"title":"联合国安理会对利比亚的制裁和调解","authors":"C. Portela, Jean-Louis Romanet Perroux","doi":"10.1163/19426720-02802005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The UN frequently employs sanctions on the same conflicts where it attempts mediation. While both efforts carry a UN stamp, they follow different political logics that are not always coherent with each other: sanctions are enacted by the UN Security Council, while mediation is led by a special representative/envoy of the UN Secretary-General, often on the basis of a Security Council mandate. This article explores two UN interventions in Libya that combined mediation with mandatory sanctions: the conflict leading to the overthrow of the Muammar Qaddafi regime (2011) and the civil war that ensued when the country was split between the first elected parliament and its successor (2014–2015). The Libyan case illustrates that the coherence of mediation and sanctions ultimately depends on the UN Security Council unity of purpose.","PeriodicalId":47262,"journal":{"name":"Global Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UN Security Council Sanctions and Mediation in Libya\",\"authors\":\"C. Portela, Jean-Louis Romanet Perroux\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/19426720-02802005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The UN frequently employs sanctions on the same conflicts where it attempts mediation. While both efforts carry a UN stamp, they follow different political logics that are not always coherent with each other: sanctions are enacted by the UN Security Council, while mediation is led by a special representative/envoy of the UN Secretary-General, often on the basis of a Security Council mandate. This article explores two UN interventions in Libya that combined mediation with mandatory sanctions: the conflict leading to the overthrow of the Muammar Qaddafi regime (2011) and the civil war that ensued when the country was split between the first elected parliament and its successor (2014–2015). The Libyan case illustrates that the coherence of mediation and sanctions ultimately depends on the UN Security Council unity of purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Governance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02802005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02802005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

联合国经常对试图调解的冲突采取制裁措施。虽然这两项努力都有联合国的印记,但它们遵循的政治逻辑并不总是一致的:制裁由联合国安理会颁布,而调解则由联合国秘书长的一名特别代表/特使领导,通常是根据安理会的授权。本文探讨了联合国对利比亚的两次干预,即将调解与强制性制裁相结合:导致推翻穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲政权的冲突(2011年),以及该国在第一届民选议会及其继任者之间分裂时引发的内战(2014-2015年)。利比亚案件表明,调解和制裁的一致性最终取决于联合国安理会目标的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UN Security Council Sanctions and Mediation in Libya
The UN frequently employs sanctions on the same conflicts where it attempts mediation. While both efforts carry a UN stamp, they follow different political logics that are not always coherent with each other: sanctions are enacted by the UN Security Council, while mediation is led by a special representative/envoy of the UN Secretary-General, often on the basis of a Security Council mandate. This article explores two UN interventions in Libya that combined mediation with mandatory sanctions: the conflict leading to the overthrow of the Muammar Qaddafi regime (2011) and the civil war that ensued when the country was split between the first elected parliament and its successor (2014–2015). The Libyan case illustrates that the coherence of mediation and sanctions ultimately depends on the UN Security Council unity of purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Governance
Global Governance INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信