回顾性分析单一减肥中心与Orbera胃内球囊相关的体重减轻

V. Reddy, Nitish Sood, J. Hua, Christopher Ibikunle
{"title":"回顾性分析单一减肥中心与Orbera胃内球囊相关的体重减轻","authors":"V. Reddy, Nitish Sood, J. Hua, Christopher Ibikunle","doi":"10.15761/GOS.1000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective Study: An assessment of weight loss and safety profile of ORBERA Intragastric Balloon System (IBS). Background: Lifestyle modification and dietary management have proven to be ineffective in the treatment of obesity. ORBERA Intragastric Balloon (IGB) system, a treatment modality approved by the US Food and Drug Administration has recently become available commercially for the treatment of refractory obesity in patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35-40. Setting: A private clinic based in the United States. Objectives: Data on the effectiveness and accommodative adverse effect of ORBERA IGB are currently limited. The objective of this study is to measure the effect of IGB on weight loss, assess the accommodative adverse event safety profile and examine factors associated with accommodative symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. Methods: A review of records of 22 patients treated using ORBERA in a private clinic from September 2016 to January 2018 was conducted. The balloons were filled with 400-600 mL of saline solution. The IGB was placed and removed endoscopically over a treatment period of 6 months. Results: The sample size comprised of 18 (81.82%) females and 4 (18.18%) males with a mean age of 49.23 (range 21-76 years). The most common comorbidities in this population were gastroparesis (4, 20%), hiatal hernia (6%29%), diabetes mellitus (3%-15%), and cholecystitis (2%-10%). The baseline mean weight was 239.26 lb (range 158 lb-323 lb), baseline mean BMI was 39.48 (range 29.85-48.90).The mean end of treatment weight was 182.2lb (range 134 lb-279 lb) with a mean weight loss of 32.2 lb (range 16 lb-48 lb) and a mean BMI 30.79 (range 25.3- 40.2) at end of the 6 months treatment period. No serious adverse events were observed during the endoscopic placement and removal of the system. The most frequent accommodative adverse events were nausea 13 (65%), vomiting 12 (60%), reflux/Gastroesophageal reflux disease 8 (40%). No significant characteristics associated with the accommodative side effects (e.g. nausea and vomiting) were discernible. Conclusion: The findings suggest that ORBERA IGB is an effective, safe and reasonably well-tolerated management option for obesity as significant weight loss was found consistently in the study population. However, further study is recommended for a better understanding of the accommodative symptoms associated with the IGB system.","PeriodicalId":73175,"journal":{"name":"Global surgery (London)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective analysis of weight loss associated with the Orbera intragastric balloon at a single bariatric center\",\"authors\":\"V. Reddy, Nitish Sood, J. Hua, Christopher Ibikunle\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/GOS.1000217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Retrospective Study: An assessment of weight loss and safety profile of ORBERA Intragastric Balloon System (IBS). Background: Lifestyle modification and dietary management have proven to be ineffective in the treatment of obesity. ORBERA Intragastric Balloon (IGB) system, a treatment modality approved by the US Food and Drug Administration has recently become available commercially for the treatment of refractory obesity in patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35-40. Setting: A private clinic based in the United States. Objectives: Data on the effectiveness and accommodative adverse effect of ORBERA IGB are currently limited. The objective of this study is to measure the effect of IGB on weight loss, assess the accommodative adverse event safety profile and examine factors associated with accommodative symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. Methods: A review of records of 22 patients treated using ORBERA in a private clinic from September 2016 to January 2018 was conducted. The balloons were filled with 400-600 mL of saline solution. The IGB was placed and removed endoscopically over a treatment period of 6 months. Results: The sample size comprised of 18 (81.82%) females and 4 (18.18%) males with a mean age of 49.23 (range 21-76 years). The most common comorbidities in this population were gastroparesis (4, 20%), hiatal hernia (6%29%), diabetes mellitus (3%-15%), and cholecystitis (2%-10%). The baseline mean weight was 239.26 lb (range 158 lb-323 lb), baseline mean BMI was 39.48 (range 29.85-48.90).The mean end of treatment weight was 182.2lb (range 134 lb-279 lb) with a mean weight loss of 32.2 lb (range 16 lb-48 lb) and a mean BMI 30.79 (range 25.3- 40.2) at end of the 6 months treatment period. No serious adverse events were observed during the endoscopic placement and removal of the system. The most frequent accommodative adverse events were nausea 13 (65%), vomiting 12 (60%), reflux/Gastroesophageal reflux disease 8 (40%). No significant characteristics associated with the accommodative side effects (e.g. nausea and vomiting) were discernible. Conclusion: The findings suggest that ORBERA IGB is an effective, safe and reasonably well-tolerated management option for obesity as significant weight loss was found consistently in the study population. However, further study is recommended for a better understanding of the accommodative symptoms associated with the IGB system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global surgery (London)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global surgery (London)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/GOS.1000217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global surgery (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/GOS.1000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾性研究:ORBERA胃内球囊系统(IBS)的减肥和安全性评估。背景:生活方式的改变和饮食管理已被证明在治疗肥胖方面无效。ORBERA胃内球囊(IGB)系统是美国食品和药物管理局批准的一种治疗方式,最近已在商业上用于治疗体重指数(BMI)为35-40的患者的难治性肥胖。背景:一家位于美国的私人诊所。目的:关于ORBERA IGB的有效性和调节性不良反应的数据目前有限。本研究的目的是测量IGB对减肥的影响,评估调节性不良事件的安全性,并检查与调节性症状(如恶心和呕吐)相关的因素。方法:回顾2016年9月至2018年1月在一家私人诊所接受ORBERA治疗的22名患者的记录。用400-600mL的盐水溶液填充气球。在6个月的治疗期内,通过内镜放置和移除IGB。结果:样本量包括18名(81.82%)女性和4名(18.18%)男性,平均年龄49.23岁(21-76岁)。该人群中最常见的合并症是胃轻瘫(4.20%)、裂孔疝(6%29%)、糖尿病(3%-15%)和胆囊炎(2%-10%)。基线平均体重为239.26磅(范围158磅-323磅),基线平均BMI为39.48(范围29.85-48.90)。治疗结束时的平均体重为182.2磅(范围134磅-279磅),6个月治疗期结束时平均体重减轻32.2磅(范围16磅-48磅),平均BMI为30.79(范围25.3-40.2)。内窥镜放置和移除系统期间未观察到严重不良事件。最常见的调节性不良事件是恶心13例(65%),呕吐12例(60%),反流/胃食管反流病8例(40%)。未发现与调节性副作用(如恶心和呕吐)相关的显著特征。结论:研究结果表明,ORBERA IGB是一种有效、安全且耐受性良好的肥胖治疗选择,因为在研究人群中始终发现显著的体重减轻。然而,为了更好地了解与IGB系统相关的调节性症状,建议进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective analysis of weight loss associated with the Orbera intragastric balloon at a single bariatric center
Retrospective Study: An assessment of weight loss and safety profile of ORBERA Intragastric Balloon System (IBS). Background: Lifestyle modification and dietary management have proven to be ineffective in the treatment of obesity. ORBERA Intragastric Balloon (IGB) system, a treatment modality approved by the US Food and Drug Administration has recently become available commercially for the treatment of refractory obesity in patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35-40. Setting: A private clinic based in the United States. Objectives: Data on the effectiveness and accommodative adverse effect of ORBERA IGB are currently limited. The objective of this study is to measure the effect of IGB on weight loss, assess the accommodative adverse event safety profile and examine factors associated with accommodative symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. Methods: A review of records of 22 patients treated using ORBERA in a private clinic from September 2016 to January 2018 was conducted. The balloons were filled with 400-600 mL of saline solution. The IGB was placed and removed endoscopically over a treatment period of 6 months. Results: The sample size comprised of 18 (81.82%) females and 4 (18.18%) males with a mean age of 49.23 (range 21-76 years). The most common comorbidities in this population were gastroparesis (4, 20%), hiatal hernia (6%29%), diabetes mellitus (3%-15%), and cholecystitis (2%-10%). The baseline mean weight was 239.26 lb (range 158 lb-323 lb), baseline mean BMI was 39.48 (range 29.85-48.90).The mean end of treatment weight was 182.2lb (range 134 lb-279 lb) with a mean weight loss of 32.2 lb (range 16 lb-48 lb) and a mean BMI 30.79 (range 25.3- 40.2) at end of the 6 months treatment period. No serious adverse events were observed during the endoscopic placement and removal of the system. The most frequent accommodative adverse events were nausea 13 (65%), vomiting 12 (60%), reflux/Gastroesophageal reflux disease 8 (40%). No significant characteristics associated with the accommodative side effects (e.g. nausea and vomiting) were discernible. Conclusion: The findings suggest that ORBERA IGB is an effective, safe and reasonably well-tolerated management option for obesity as significant weight loss was found consistently in the study population. However, further study is recommended for a better understanding of the accommodative symptoms associated with the IGB system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信