DRL-Rituximab与MabThera治疗弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的随机双盲药代动力学等效性试验

A. Viswabandya, Sandip Shah, A. Mukhopadhyay, R. Nagarkar, Sonica Sachdeva Batra, L. López-Lázaro, S. Kankanwadi, A. Srivastava
{"title":"DRL-Rituximab与MabThera治疗弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的随机双盲药代动力学等效性试验","authors":"A. Viswabandya, Sandip Shah, A. Mukhopadhyay, R. Nagarkar, Sonica Sachdeva Batra, L. López-Lázaro, S. Kankanwadi, A. Srivastava","doi":"10.1200/JGO.19.00248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE We sought to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of DRL-rituximab (DRL_RI; potential biosimilar) and innovator rituximab MabThera (Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany; reference medicinal product [RMP]) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Efficacy, pharmacodynamics (PDs), safety, and immunogenicity were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with untreated DLBCL who were eligible to receive cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive DRL_RI or RMP for six 21-day cycles of rituximab plus CHOP, with 18 months of follow-up after day 1, cycle 6 (C6). Primary end point was C1 PKs, measured as area under the plasma concentration–time curve from day 0 to 21 (AUC0-21 days) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Equivalence was defined as 90% CIs for the DRL_RI/RMP geometric mean ratios (GMRs) within 80% and 125%. Secondary end points included efficacy noninferiority measured by objective response rate (ORR) at C6 and event-free survival and overall survival at 87 weeks, PK equivalence at C6 and PD equivalence (rate of B-cell depletion and repletion), safety, and immunogenicity. The trial was stopped after sufficient patients for primary end point evaluation were enrolled. Secondary end points are reported as observed. RESULTS A total of 151 patients were randomly assigned (DRL_RI, n = 76; RMP, n = 75). DRL_RI/RMP GMRs for AUC0-21 days and Cmax in C1 were 99.77 (90% CI, 87.60 to 113.63) and 96.19 (90% CI, 88.65 to 104.38), respectively. ORR at C6 for DRL_RI and RMP were 82.0% and 84.8%, respectively. Rates of B-cell depletion/repletion, immunogenicity, and adverse events were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION DRL_RI and RMP had equivalent PKs, with comparable efficacy, PDs, safety, and immunogenicity.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1200/JGO.19.00248","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, Double-Blind, Pharmacokinetic Equivalence Trial Comparing DRL-Rituximab With MabThera in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma\",\"authors\":\"A. Viswabandya, Sandip Shah, A. Mukhopadhyay, R. Nagarkar, Sonica Sachdeva Batra, L. López-Lázaro, S. Kankanwadi, A. Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JGO.19.00248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE We sought to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of DRL-rituximab (DRL_RI; potential biosimilar) and innovator rituximab MabThera (Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany; reference medicinal product [RMP]) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Efficacy, pharmacodynamics (PDs), safety, and immunogenicity were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with untreated DLBCL who were eligible to receive cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive DRL_RI or RMP for six 21-day cycles of rituximab plus CHOP, with 18 months of follow-up after day 1, cycle 6 (C6). Primary end point was C1 PKs, measured as area under the plasma concentration–time curve from day 0 to 21 (AUC0-21 days) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Equivalence was defined as 90% CIs for the DRL_RI/RMP geometric mean ratios (GMRs) within 80% and 125%. Secondary end points included efficacy noninferiority measured by objective response rate (ORR) at C6 and event-free survival and overall survival at 87 weeks, PK equivalence at C6 and PD equivalence (rate of B-cell depletion and repletion), safety, and immunogenicity. The trial was stopped after sufficient patients for primary end point evaluation were enrolled. Secondary end points are reported as observed. RESULTS A total of 151 patients were randomly assigned (DRL_RI, n = 76; RMP, n = 75). DRL_RI/RMP GMRs for AUC0-21 days and Cmax in C1 were 99.77 (90% CI, 87.60 to 113.63) and 96.19 (90% CI, 88.65 to 104.38), respectively. ORR at C6 for DRL_RI and RMP were 82.0% and 84.8%, respectively. Rates of B-cell depletion/repletion, immunogenicity, and adverse events were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION DRL_RI and RMP had equivalent PKs, with comparable efficacy, PDs, safety, and immunogenicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1200/JGO.19.00248\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.19.00248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.19.00248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们试图比较DRL利妥昔单抗(DRL_RI;潜在生物仿制药)和创新药物利妥昔mab MabThera(Roche,Grenzach Wyhlen,德国;参考药品[RMP])在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中的药代动力学(PKs)。还比较了疗效、药效学、安全性和免疫原性。患者和方法我们对未经治疗的DLBCL患者进行了一项双盲、平行组研究,这些患者有资格接受环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)治疗。患者以一对一的比例被随机分配接受DRL_RI或RMP,为期6个21天的利妥昔单抗加CHOP周期,第1天,第6周期(C6)后随访18个月。主要终点为C1 PKs,测量为第0天至第21天(AUC0-21天)的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积和最大血浆浓度(Cmax)。等效性定义为DRL_RI/RMP几何平均比(GMR)在80%和125%之间的90%CI。次要终点包括通过C6时的客观反应率(ORR)、87周时的无事件生存率和总生存率、C6时的PK等效性和PD等效性(B细胞耗竭和充满率)、安全性和免疫原性测量的疗效非劣效性。在招募了足够多的患者进行主要终点评估后,试验停止。次要终点报告为观察到的终点。结果共151例患者被随机分配(DRL_RI,n=76;RMP,n=75)。AUC0-21天的DRL_RI/RMP GMRs和C1的Cmax分别为99.77(90%CI,87.60-113.63)和96.19(90%CI,88.65-104.38)。DRL_RI和RMP在C6的ORR分别为82.0%和84.8%。两组的B细胞耗竭/补充率、免疫原性和不良事件具有可比性。结论DRL_RI和RMP具有等效的PKs,具有相当的疗效、PDs、安全性和免疫原性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized, Double-Blind, Pharmacokinetic Equivalence Trial Comparing DRL-Rituximab With MabThera in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
PURPOSE We sought to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of DRL-rituximab (DRL_RI; potential biosimilar) and innovator rituximab MabThera (Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany; reference medicinal product [RMP]) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Efficacy, pharmacodynamics (PDs), safety, and immunogenicity were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with untreated DLBCL who were eligible to receive cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive DRL_RI or RMP for six 21-day cycles of rituximab plus CHOP, with 18 months of follow-up after day 1, cycle 6 (C6). Primary end point was C1 PKs, measured as area under the plasma concentration–time curve from day 0 to 21 (AUC0-21 days) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Equivalence was defined as 90% CIs for the DRL_RI/RMP geometric mean ratios (GMRs) within 80% and 125%. Secondary end points included efficacy noninferiority measured by objective response rate (ORR) at C6 and event-free survival and overall survival at 87 weeks, PK equivalence at C6 and PD equivalence (rate of B-cell depletion and repletion), safety, and immunogenicity. The trial was stopped after sufficient patients for primary end point evaluation were enrolled. Secondary end points are reported as observed. RESULTS A total of 151 patients were randomly assigned (DRL_RI, n = 76; RMP, n = 75). DRL_RI/RMP GMRs for AUC0-21 days and Cmax in C1 were 99.77 (90% CI, 87.60 to 113.63) and 96.19 (90% CI, 88.65 to 104.38), respectively. ORR at C6 for DRL_RI and RMP were 82.0% and 84.8%, respectively. Rates of B-cell depletion/repletion, immunogenicity, and adverse events were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION DRL_RI and RMP had equivalent PKs, with comparable efficacy, PDs, safety, and immunogenicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信