分娩硬膜外镇痛:间歇罗哌卡因与三种不同浓度芬太尼的比较——一项随机对照试验

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Sajan Rahman, N. Puthenveettil, R. Jacob, G. Ravindran, S. Rajan, L. Kumar
{"title":"分娩硬膜外镇痛:间歇罗哌卡因与三种不同浓度芬太尼的比较——一项随机对照试验","authors":"Sajan Rahman, N. Puthenveettil, R. Jacob, G. Ravindran, S. Rajan, L. Kumar","doi":"10.4103/joacc.joacc_100_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Labor epidural analgesia can be provided with local anesthetics alone or in combination with opioids. The aim of this study was to compare the duration of analgesia, onset time, and obstetric and fetal outcomes with three different concentrations of fentanyl. Methods: This double-blinded trial was conducted on 75 parturients who delivered with epidural analgesia. They were randomly assigned to three groups by the closed envelope technique. Groups A, B, and C received a bolus dose of 20 ml 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 μgml-1, 1.5 μgml-1, and 2 μgml-1 fentanyl, respectively, as an initial epidural dose. The duration, time to onset of analgesia, top-up doses required, hemodynamics, fetal-maternal outcomes, and complications were compared. Results: The mean duration of analgesia with the first epidural dose was 57.4 ± 14.207, 121.52 ± 33.951, and 165.08 ± 34.271 min in the A, B, and C groups, respectively, with a P of <.001. There was a higher duration of analgesia in the B group than in the A group (p-value <.001), in the C group than in the B group (p. 016), and in the C group than in the A group (p-value <.001). The onset of analgesia was faster in the C group than in the A and B groups (7.960 ± 1.695, 6.800 ± 1.607, and 5.960 ± 1.645 min in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with a P of. 001). The number of epidural boluses required was 3.480 ± 0.509, 2.640 ± 0.489, and 2.120 ± 0.331 in the A, B, and C groups, respectively. Conclusion: Labor epidural analgesia with a higher concentration of fentanyl produces a prolonged and faster onset of analgesia with fewer requirements for top-up boluses.","PeriodicalId":16611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"12 1","pages":"150 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labor epidural analgesia: Comparison of intermittent boluses of ropivacaine with three different concentrations of fentanyl – A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sajan Rahman, N. Puthenveettil, R. Jacob, G. Ravindran, S. Rajan, L. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacc.joacc_100_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims: Labor epidural analgesia can be provided with local anesthetics alone or in combination with opioids. The aim of this study was to compare the duration of analgesia, onset time, and obstetric and fetal outcomes with three different concentrations of fentanyl. Methods: This double-blinded trial was conducted on 75 parturients who delivered with epidural analgesia. They were randomly assigned to three groups by the closed envelope technique. Groups A, B, and C received a bolus dose of 20 ml 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 μgml-1, 1.5 μgml-1, and 2 μgml-1 fentanyl, respectively, as an initial epidural dose. The duration, time to onset of analgesia, top-up doses required, hemodynamics, fetal-maternal outcomes, and complications were compared. Results: The mean duration of analgesia with the first epidural dose was 57.4 ± 14.207, 121.52 ± 33.951, and 165.08 ± 34.271 min in the A, B, and C groups, respectively, with a P of <.001. There was a higher duration of analgesia in the B group than in the A group (p-value <.001), in the C group than in the B group (p. 016), and in the C group than in the A group (p-value <.001). The onset of analgesia was faster in the C group than in the A and B groups (7.960 ± 1.695, 6.800 ± 1.607, and 5.960 ± 1.645 min in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with a P of. 001). The number of epidural boluses required was 3.480 ± 0.509, 2.640 ± 0.489, and 2.120 ± 0.331 in the A, B, and C groups, respectively. Conclusion: Labor epidural analgesia with a higher concentration of fentanyl produces a prolonged and faster onset of analgesia with fewer requirements for top-up boluses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"150 - 154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacc.joacc_100_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacc.joacc_100_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:分娩硬膜外镇痛可以单独使用局部麻醉剂,也可以与阿片类药物联合使用。本研究的目的是比较三种不同浓度芬太尼的镇痛持续时间、起效时间以及产科和胎儿结局。方法:对75例硬膜外镇痛分娩产妇进行双盲试验。采用封闭包络法将他们随机分为三组。A、B和C组分别接受20 ml 0.1%罗哌卡因与1μgml-1、1.5μgml-2和2μgml-1芬太尼的单次给药,作为硬膜外初始剂量。比较镇痛持续时间、开始时间、所需补充剂量、血液动力学、胎儿-母体结局和并发症。结果:A、B和C组第一次硬膜外给药的平均镇痛持续时间分别为57.4±14.207、121.52±33.951和165.08±34.271分钟,P<0.001。B组的镇痛持续时间高于a组(p值<.001),C组的镇痛时间高于B组(p值<0.016),以及C组的止痛持续时间高于a组(p值<.001)。C组的起效速度快于a组和B组(a、B和C组分别为7.960±1.695、6.800±1.607和5.960±1.645分钟,p值为.001)。A、B和C组所需硬膜外推注次数分别为3.480±0.509、2.640±0.489和2.120±0.331。结论:高浓度芬太尼分娩硬膜外镇痛可延长镇痛时间,加快镇痛速度,对补充药丸的需求更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labor epidural analgesia: Comparison of intermittent boluses of ropivacaine with three different concentrations of fentanyl – A randomized controlled trial
Background and Aims: Labor epidural analgesia can be provided with local anesthetics alone or in combination with opioids. The aim of this study was to compare the duration of analgesia, onset time, and obstetric and fetal outcomes with three different concentrations of fentanyl. Methods: This double-blinded trial was conducted on 75 parturients who delivered with epidural analgesia. They were randomly assigned to three groups by the closed envelope technique. Groups A, B, and C received a bolus dose of 20 ml 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 μgml-1, 1.5 μgml-1, and 2 μgml-1 fentanyl, respectively, as an initial epidural dose. The duration, time to onset of analgesia, top-up doses required, hemodynamics, fetal-maternal outcomes, and complications were compared. Results: The mean duration of analgesia with the first epidural dose was 57.4 ± 14.207, 121.52 ± 33.951, and 165.08 ± 34.271 min in the A, B, and C groups, respectively, with a P of <.001. There was a higher duration of analgesia in the B group than in the A group (p-value <.001), in the C group than in the B group (p. 016), and in the C group than in the A group (p-value <.001). The onset of analgesia was faster in the C group than in the A and B groups (7.960 ± 1.695, 6.800 ± 1.607, and 5.960 ± 1.645 min in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with a P of. 001). The number of epidural boluses required was 3.480 ± 0.509, 2.640 ± 0.489, and 2.120 ± 0.331 in the A, B, and C groups, respectively. Conclusion: Labor epidural analgesia with a higher concentration of fentanyl produces a prolonged and faster onset of analgesia with fewer requirements for top-up boluses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信