{"title":"恶性输尿管梗阻患者姑息性经皮肾造口管置入后的生存:验证预后模型","authors":"B. Gunawan, K. Foster, J. Hardy, P. Good","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) is a life-threatening complication of advanced cancer associated with short survival. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a commonly employed technique to decompress MUO. Prognostic models have been developed to identify patients with poor outcomes. This study aimed to validate and update the recent model by Alawneh et al. [Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, et al. Clinical Factors Associated With a Short Survival Time After Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Ureteric Obstruction in Cancer Patients: An Updated Model. J Pain Symptom Manag 2016;51(2):255–261]. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who received PCN for MUO over a 10-year period. Clinical and demographic details were recorded. Patients were stratified into prognostic groups and survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between prognostic group, individual variables and mortality was investigated. Results 29 patients had received PCN for MUO. When stratified by Alawneh prognostic group, survival was 0.9 months (0 risk factors), 8.4 months (1 factor), 3.4 months (2 factors) and 4.1 months (3 factors). No statistical association was identified between prognostic group and mortality risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.92; p = 0.72). The only variable associated with increased mortality was pre-nephrostomy haemoglobin <100 g/L (HR 2.6; p = 0.037). Conclusion Survival with MUO remains short, despite advances in supportive care and PCN. This study was unable to either validate or update the prognostic model, due to limited numbers. Further research with prospective studies is recommended.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival following palliative percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction: Validating a prognostic model\",\"authors\":\"B. Gunawan, K. Foster, J. Hardy, P. Good\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) is a life-threatening complication of advanced cancer associated with short survival. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a commonly employed technique to decompress MUO. Prognostic models have been developed to identify patients with poor outcomes. This study aimed to validate and update the recent model by Alawneh et al. [Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, et al. Clinical Factors Associated With a Short Survival Time After Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Ureteric Obstruction in Cancer Patients: An Updated Model. J Pain Symptom Manag 2016;51(2):255–261]. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who received PCN for MUO over a 10-year period. Clinical and demographic details were recorded. Patients were stratified into prognostic groups and survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between prognostic group, individual variables and mortality was investigated. Results 29 patients had received PCN for MUO. When stratified by Alawneh prognostic group, survival was 0.9 months (0 risk factors), 8.4 months (1 factor), 3.4 months (2 factors) and 4.1 months (3 factors). No statistical association was identified between prognostic group and mortality risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.92; p = 0.72). The only variable associated with increased mortality was pre-nephrostomy haemoglobin <100 g/L (HR 2.6; p = 0.037). Conclusion Survival with MUO remains short, despite advances in supportive care and PCN. This study was unable to either validate or update the prognostic model, due to limited numbers. Further research with prospective studies is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival following palliative percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction: Validating a prognostic model
Background and Aims Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) is a life-threatening complication of advanced cancer associated with short survival. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a commonly employed technique to decompress MUO. Prognostic models have been developed to identify patients with poor outcomes. This study aimed to validate and update the recent model by Alawneh et al. [Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, et al. Clinical Factors Associated With a Short Survival Time After Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Ureteric Obstruction in Cancer Patients: An Updated Model. J Pain Symptom Manag 2016;51(2):255–261]. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who received PCN for MUO over a 10-year period. Clinical and demographic details were recorded. Patients were stratified into prognostic groups and survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between prognostic group, individual variables and mortality was investigated. Results 29 patients had received PCN for MUO. When stratified by Alawneh prognostic group, survival was 0.9 months (0 risk factors), 8.4 months (1 factor), 3.4 months (2 factors) and 4.1 months (3 factors). No statistical association was identified between prognostic group and mortality risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.92; p = 0.72). The only variable associated with increased mortality was pre-nephrostomy haemoglobin <100 g/L (HR 2.6; p = 0.037). Conclusion Survival with MUO remains short, despite advances in supportive care and PCN. This study was unable to either validate or update the prognostic model, due to limited numbers. Further research with prospective studies is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.