校本艺术治疗的过程-结果研究

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
D. Regev
{"title":"校本艺术治疗的过程-结果研究","authors":"D. Regev","doi":"10.1080/17454832.2021.1957960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Only a few studies in the arts therapies in general and in the field of visual art therapy in particular have begun to address process variables and their relationship to outcome variables. Aim The present study thus aimed to contribute to this literature by examining the relationship between process variables and outcome variables in the school-based art therapy setting. Method The process-outcome relationship was examined in a school-based art therapy setting in a sample of 32 art therapists and 44 clients aged 7–13. Hypothesis 1 predicted that over the course of art therapy, client involvement and client productive behaviours would increase whereas resistance would decrease. Hypothesis 2 predicted that increases in client involvement and client productive behaviours and decreases in client resistance would be linked to decreases in behavioural problems. Results Both hypotheses were partially supported in that cognitive–behavioural exploration and emotional exploration differed significantly during therapy. In addition, there was a significant correlation between improvement in client involvement and cognitive–behavioural exploration and improvement in internalising problems. Conclusions The present study provides initial support for the claim that the processes in art therapy with children are more complex than is typically assumed for art therapy. For example, the results showed that an increase in resistance and a decrease in insight were associated with positive outcomes. Implications for practice The findings indicated that in the education system, cognitive–behavioural exploration is an important variable. Models such as the cognitive–behavioural approach thus may be useful in school-based art therapy. Plain-language summary Recent studies have attested to the positive impact of art therapy on children and adolescents. However, little is known about what happens during the process of therapy and how it can lead to a positive outcome. The present study examined the relationship between process variables and outcome variables in the school-based art therapy setting. For this purpose, it focused on two process variables. The first was the art therapist's assessment of the client's degree of involvement in therapy. The second process variable was the therapist's assessment of the client's productive behaviours as well as resistance to therapy. This assessment can shed light on the ways in which the client responds to the therapist's interventions. The outcome variable was Child Behaviour Checklist that is designed to evaluate changes in children's behaviour and functioning over time or before/after therapy. Thirty-two art therapists employed by the Israel Ministry of Education and 44 clients participated in the present study. At the beginning of the school year, each art therapist selected one or two of her clients, who were in grades 1–7. Consent was obtained from both the clients and their parents. Parents and teachers filled out the outcome measure, at the beginning (September) and end of the year (June). The art therapists were asked to fill in the process measures after each treatment session (once a week). The results showed that cognitive–behavioural exploration and emotional exploration differed significantly across time. In addition, an association was found between improvement in client involvement and cognitive–behavioural exploration and improvement in internalising problems. The present study provides initial support for the claim that the processes in art therapy with children in general and within the school setting in particular are more complex than is typically assumed for art therapy.","PeriodicalId":39969,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A process-outcome study of school-based art therapy\",\"authors\":\"D. Regev\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17454832.2021.1957960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Only a few studies in the arts therapies in general and in the field of visual art therapy in particular have begun to address process variables and their relationship to outcome variables. Aim The present study thus aimed to contribute to this literature by examining the relationship between process variables and outcome variables in the school-based art therapy setting. Method The process-outcome relationship was examined in a school-based art therapy setting in a sample of 32 art therapists and 44 clients aged 7–13. Hypothesis 1 predicted that over the course of art therapy, client involvement and client productive behaviours would increase whereas resistance would decrease. Hypothesis 2 predicted that increases in client involvement and client productive behaviours and decreases in client resistance would be linked to decreases in behavioural problems. Results Both hypotheses were partially supported in that cognitive–behavioural exploration and emotional exploration differed significantly during therapy. In addition, there was a significant correlation between improvement in client involvement and cognitive–behavioural exploration and improvement in internalising problems. Conclusions The present study provides initial support for the claim that the processes in art therapy with children are more complex than is typically assumed for art therapy. For example, the results showed that an increase in resistance and a decrease in insight were associated with positive outcomes. Implications for practice The findings indicated that in the education system, cognitive–behavioural exploration is an important variable. Models such as the cognitive–behavioural approach thus may be useful in school-based art therapy. Plain-language summary Recent studies have attested to the positive impact of art therapy on children and adolescents. However, little is known about what happens during the process of therapy and how it can lead to a positive outcome. The present study examined the relationship between process variables and outcome variables in the school-based art therapy setting. For this purpose, it focused on two process variables. The first was the art therapist's assessment of the client's degree of involvement in therapy. The second process variable was the therapist's assessment of the client's productive behaviours as well as resistance to therapy. This assessment can shed light on the ways in which the client responds to the therapist's interventions. The outcome variable was Child Behaviour Checklist that is designed to evaluate changes in children's behaviour and functioning over time or before/after therapy. Thirty-two art therapists employed by the Israel Ministry of Education and 44 clients participated in the present study. At the beginning of the school year, each art therapist selected one or two of her clients, who were in grades 1–7. Consent was obtained from both the clients and their parents. Parents and teachers filled out the outcome measure, at the beginning (September) and end of the year (June). The art therapists were asked to fill in the process measures after each treatment session (once a week). The results showed that cognitive–behavioural exploration and emotional exploration differed significantly across time. In addition, an association was found between improvement in client involvement and cognitive–behavioural exploration and improvement in internalising problems. The present study provides initial support for the claim that the processes in art therapy with children in general and within the school setting in particular are more complex than is typically assumed for art therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2021.1957960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2021.1957960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要背景只有少数在艺术治疗领域,特别是视觉艺术治疗领域的研究开始涉及过程变量及其与结果变量的关系。目的本研究旨在通过研究学校艺术治疗环境中过程变量和结果变量之间的关系,为本文献做出贡献。方法在学校艺术治疗环境中,以32名艺术治疗师和44名7-13岁的客户为样本,检验过程-结果关系。假设1预测,在艺术治疗过程中,客户的参与度和客户的生产行为会增加,而抵抗力会降低。假设2预测,客户参与度和客户生产行为的增加以及客户抵抗力的降低将与行为问题的减少有关。结果两种假设都得到了部分支持,即认知-行为探索和情绪探索在治疗过程中存在显著差异。此外,客户参与度的提高与认知-行为探索以及内化问题的改善之间存在显著相关性。结论本研究为儿童艺术治疗的过程比通常认为的艺术治疗更复杂的说法提供了初步支持。例如,研究结果表明,抵抗力的增加和洞察力的下降与积极的结果有关。研究结果表明,在教育系统中,认知-行为探索是一个重要的变量。因此,认知-行为方法等模式可能对以学校为基础的艺术治疗有用。简明语言摘要最近的研究证实了艺术治疗对儿童和青少年的积极影响。然而,人们对治疗过程中发生的事情以及如何产生积极结果知之甚少。本研究考察了在学校艺术治疗环境中过程变量和结果变量之间的关系。为此,它侧重于两个过程变量。第一个是艺术治疗师对客户参与治疗的程度的评估。第二个过程变量是治疗师对客户的生产行为以及对治疗的抵抗力的评估。这种评估可以揭示客户对治疗师干预的反应方式。结果变量是儿童行为检查表,旨在评估儿童行为和功能随时间或治疗前后的变化。32名受雇于以色列教育部的艺术治疗师和44名客户参与了本研究。在学年开始时,每位艺术治疗师都会从她的客户中挑选一到两名,他们都是1-7年级的学生。征得了客户及其父母的同意。家长和老师在年初(9月)和年底(6月)填写了结果测量。艺术治疗师被要求在每次治疗后填写过程测量(每周一次)。研究结果表明,认知-行为探索和情感探索在不同时间有显著差异。此外,发现客户参与度的提高与认知-行为探索和内化问题的改善之间存在关联。本研究为以下说法提供了初步支持,即儿童艺术治疗的过程,特别是在学校环境中,比通常认为的艺术治疗过程更复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A process-outcome study of school-based art therapy
ABSTRACT Background Only a few studies in the arts therapies in general and in the field of visual art therapy in particular have begun to address process variables and their relationship to outcome variables. Aim The present study thus aimed to contribute to this literature by examining the relationship between process variables and outcome variables in the school-based art therapy setting. Method The process-outcome relationship was examined in a school-based art therapy setting in a sample of 32 art therapists and 44 clients aged 7–13. Hypothesis 1 predicted that over the course of art therapy, client involvement and client productive behaviours would increase whereas resistance would decrease. Hypothesis 2 predicted that increases in client involvement and client productive behaviours and decreases in client resistance would be linked to decreases in behavioural problems. Results Both hypotheses were partially supported in that cognitive–behavioural exploration and emotional exploration differed significantly during therapy. In addition, there was a significant correlation between improvement in client involvement and cognitive–behavioural exploration and improvement in internalising problems. Conclusions The present study provides initial support for the claim that the processes in art therapy with children are more complex than is typically assumed for art therapy. For example, the results showed that an increase in resistance and a decrease in insight were associated with positive outcomes. Implications for practice The findings indicated that in the education system, cognitive–behavioural exploration is an important variable. Models such as the cognitive–behavioural approach thus may be useful in school-based art therapy. Plain-language summary Recent studies have attested to the positive impact of art therapy on children and adolescents. However, little is known about what happens during the process of therapy and how it can lead to a positive outcome. The present study examined the relationship between process variables and outcome variables in the school-based art therapy setting. For this purpose, it focused on two process variables. The first was the art therapist's assessment of the client's degree of involvement in therapy. The second process variable was the therapist's assessment of the client's productive behaviours as well as resistance to therapy. This assessment can shed light on the ways in which the client responds to the therapist's interventions. The outcome variable was Child Behaviour Checklist that is designed to evaluate changes in children's behaviour and functioning over time or before/after therapy. Thirty-two art therapists employed by the Israel Ministry of Education and 44 clients participated in the present study. At the beginning of the school year, each art therapist selected one or two of her clients, who were in grades 1–7. Consent was obtained from both the clients and their parents. Parents and teachers filled out the outcome measure, at the beginning (September) and end of the year (June). The art therapists were asked to fill in the process measures after each treatment session (once a week). The results showed that cognitive–behavioural exploration and emotional exploration differed significantly across time. In addition, an association was found between improvement in client involvement and cognitive–behavioural exploration and improvement in internalising problems. The present study provides initial support for the claim that the processes in art therapy with children in general and within the school setting in particular are more complex than is typically assumed for art therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信