共存的冠状动脉和颈动脉疾病:我们做了什么,发生了什么

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
M. R. Güney, Erhan Güler, Erkan Albay, T. Kehlibar, Mehmet Yılmaz, B. Ketenci
{"title":"共存的冠状动脉和颈动脉疾病:我们做了什么,发生了什么","authors":"M. R. Güney, Erhan Güler, Erkan Albay, T. Kehlibar, Mehmet Yılmaz, B. Ketenci","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. Methods Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. Results In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). Conclusion Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34th month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter.","PeriodicalId":54481,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular","volume":"37 1","pages":"648 - 653"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Güney, Erhan Güler, Erkan Albay, T. Kehlibar, Mehmet Yılmaz, B. Ketenci\",\"doi\":\"10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. Methods Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. Results In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). Conclusion Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34th month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"648 - 653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言对于合并冠状动脉和颈动脉疾病的三种手术方法和长期后果,目前还没有完全的共识。我们在临床上对这一高危人群的手术结果进行了十年的回顾性评估。方法2005年至2015年间,196名患者接受了颈动脉和冠状动脉合并疾病的治疗。共有50名患者采用分期方法进行手术,其中40名患者优先接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),10名患者优先进行冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)。82例患者同时行CABG和CEA;64例单侧颈动脉病变且狭窄超过70%的无症状患者仅行冠状动脉旁路移植术(64例)。结果通过围手术期、术后早期和晚期数据的单因素/多因素分析进行评估。结果分期组手术间隔时间为2.82±0.74个月。围手术期和术后早期(30天)参数在各组之间没有差异(P值<0.05)。术后随访时间平均为94.9±38.3个月。术后事件分为三组:(A)死亡(全因)、(B)心血管事件(非致命性心肌梗死、复发性心绞痛、充血性心力衰竭、心悸)和(C)致命性神经事件(黑蒙、短暂性脑缺血发作和中风)。当排除C组事件时,所有三种方法的无事件精算生存率相似(P=0.740)。当包括所有事件时,精算生存率显著不同(P=0.027)。神经事件在第34个月至第66个月之间显著增加(P=0.004)。结论所有三种方法的围手术期和术后早期无事件生存率相似。到第34个月初,唯一的CABG组由于神经事件而被阴性分离。在方法的选择中,“最受威胁的器官优先级”被视为临床参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened
Introduction There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. Methods Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. Results In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). Conclusion Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34th month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular
Revista Brasileira De Cirurgia Cardiovascular CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (BJCVS) is the official journal of the Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery (SBCCV). BJCVS is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal, with regular circulation since 1986. BJCVS aims to record the scientific and innovation production in cardiovascular surgery and promote study, improvement and professional updating in the specialty. It has significant impact on cardiovascular surgery practice and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信