基于游戏的学习过程中情绪与单一文本与多重文本的理解

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Daryn A. Dever, Megan D. Wiedbusch, Elizabeth B. Cloude, James C. Lester, R. Azevedo
{"title":"基于游戏的学习过程中情绪与单一文本与多重文本的理解","authors":"Daryn A. Dever, Megan D. Wiedbusch, Elizabeth B. Cloude, James C. Lester, R. Azevedo","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2021.1950450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined 57 learners’ emotions (i.e., joy, anger, confusion, frustration) as they engaged with scientific content while learning about microbiology with Crystal Island, a game-based learning environment (GBLE). Measures of learners’ prior knowledge, in-game text comprehension, facial expressions of emotion, and posttest reading comprehension were collected to examine the relationship between emotions and single- and multiple-text comprehension. Analyses found that both discrete and non-discrete emotions were expressed during reading and answering in-game assessments of single-text comprehension. Learners expressed greater joy during reading and greater expressions of anger, confusion, and frustration during in-game assessments. Further results found that learners who expressed a high number of different emotions throughout reading and completing in-game assessments tended to have lower in-game comprehension scores whereas a higher number of different expressed emotions while completing in-game assessments was associated with greater posttest comprehension. Finally, while increased prior knowledge was associated with higher single- and multiple-text comprehension, there was no interaction between prior knowledge and emotions on multiple-text comprehension. Overall, this study found that (1) learners often express more than one emotion during GBLE activities, (2) emotions expressed while learning with a GBLE shift across different activities, and (3) emotions are related to demonstrated comprehension, but the type of activity influences this relationship. Results from this study provide implications for how emotions can be examined as learners engage in GBLE activities as well as the design of GBLEs to support learners’ emotions accounting for different activity demands to increase comprehension of single and multiple texts.","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"59 1","pages":"94 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotions and the Comprehension of Single versus Multiple Texts during Game-based Learning\",\"authors\":\"Daryn A. Dever, Megan D. Wiedbusch, Elizabeth B. Cloude, James C. Lester, R. Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0163853X.2021.1950450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study examined 57 learners’ emotions (i.e., joy, anger, confusion, frustration) as they engaged with scientific content while learning about microbiology with Crystal Island, a game-based learning environment (GBLE). Measures of learners’ prior knowledge, in-game text comprehension, facial expressions of emotion, and posttest reading comprehension were collected to examine the relationship between emotions and single- and multiple-text comprehension. Analyses found that both discrete and non-discrete emotions were expressed during reading and answering in-game assessments of single-text comprehension. Learners expressed greater joy during reading and greater expressions of anger, confusion, and frustration during in-game assessments. Further results found that learners who expressed a high number of different emotions throughout reading and completing in-game assessments tended to have lower in-game comprehension scores whereas a higher number of different expressed emotions while completing in-game assessments was associated with greater posttest comprehension. Finally, while increased prior knowledge was associated with higher single- and multiple-text comprehension, there was no interaction between prior knowledge and emotions on multiple-text comprehension. Overall, this study found that (1) learners often express more than one emotion during GBLE activities, (2) emotions expressed while learning with a GBLE shift across different activities, and (3) emotions are related to demonstrated comprehension, but the type of activity influences this relationship. Results from this study provide implications for how emotions can be examined as learners engage in GBLE activities as well as the design of GBLEs to support learners’ emotions accounting for different activity demands to increase comprehension of single and multiple texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse Processes\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"94 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1950450\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1950450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要本研究调查了57名学习者在水晶岛(一个基于游戏的学习环境,GBLE)学习微生物学时参与科学内容时的情绪(即喜悦、愤怒、困惑和沮丧)。收集学习者的先验知识、游戏中的文本理解、情绪的面部表情和测试后的阅读理解,以检验情绪与单文本和多文本理解之间的关系。分析发现,在阅读和回答游戏中对单个文本理解的评估时,离散和非离散情绪都会表达出来。学习者在阅读过程中表现出更大的喜悦,在游戏评估中表现出更多的愤怒、困惑和沮丧。进一步的结果发现,在阅读和完成游戏内评估过程中表达大量不同情绪的学习者往往游戏内理解得分较低,而在完成游戏内测试时表达的不同情绪数量越多,则测试后理解能力越强。最后,虽然先验知识的增加与更高的单文本和多文本理解有关,但在多文本理解中,先验知识和情绪之间没有交互作用。总体而言,本研究发现:(1)学习者在GBLE活动中经常表达不止一种情绪,(2)在不同活动中随着GBLE的变化而学习时表达的情绪,以及(3)情绪与所展示的理解有关,但活动类型会影响这种关系。这项研究的结果为如何在学习者参与GBLE活动时检查情绪提供了启示,并为支持学习者的情绪设计了GBLE,以满足不同的活动需求,从而提高对单个和多个文本的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotions and the Comprehension of Single versus Multiple Texts during Game-based Learning
ABSTRACT This study examined 57 learners’ emotions (i.e., joy, anger, confusion, frustration) as they engaged with scientific content while learning about microbiology with Crystal Island, a game-based learning environment (GBLE). Measures of learners’ prior knowledge, in-game text comprehension, facial expressions of emotion, and posttest reading comprehension were collected to examine the relationship between emotions and single- and multiple-text comprehension. Analyses found that both discrete and non-discrete emotions were expressed during reading and answering in-game assessments of single-text comprehension. Learners expressed greater joy during reading and greater expressions of anger, confusion, and frustration during in-game assessments. Further results found that learners who expressed a high number of different emotions throughout reading and completing in-game assessments tended to have lower in-game comprehension scores whereas a higher number of different expressed emotions while completing in-game assessments was associated with greater posttest comprehension. Finally, while increased prior knowledge was associated with higher single- and multiple-text comprehension, there was no interaction between prior knowledge and emotions on multiple-text comprehension. Overall, this study found that (1) learners often express more than one emotion during GBLE activities, (2) emotions expressed while learning with a GBLE shift across different activities, and (3) emotions are related to demonstrated comprehension, but the type of activity influences this relationship. Results from this study provide implications for how emotions can be examined as learners engage in GBLE activities as well as the design of GBLEs to support learners’ emotions accounting for different activity demands to increase comprehension of single and multiple texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信