组成和/作为后殖民耻辱:菲利普·米勒的《倒带》:声音、磁带和证词的康塔塔

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Carina Venter
{"title":"组成和/作为后殖民耻辱:菲利普·米勒的《倒带》:声音、磁带和证词的康塔塔","authors":"Carina Venter","doi":"10.1080/02533952.2021.1969635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article engages the aporias that arise at the intersection of postcolonial aesthetics, trauma and ethics through a consideration of Philip Miller’s REwind: A Cantata for Voice, Tape, and Testimony, composed to commemorate the tenth anniversary of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Following an introduction of REwind, I briefly touch on the creative instrumentalisation of testimony before considering the lengths to which Miller went to replicate an ethic of reconciliation as it had been instituted by the TRC. What I uncover is an exemplary victim-centred ethics, deployed by Miller, which closely mirrors that of the TRC. Yet, REwind is riven with incommensurabilities, from its white reception to the seminal musical moment that sounds the testimony of Eunice Miya against a musical gesture that signifies convention and cliché. To make sense of these, I turn to the work of Timothy Bewes to enable a framing of REwind in terms of postcolonial shame and incommensurability. That is, I follow Bewes in reading the “difficulties and infelicities” of the text, ”not along a continuum of evaluative aesthetic criteria, but rather as instances of inevitable failure–the inevitable failure of postcolonial aesthetics to meet adequately the imperatives of postcolonial ethics.","PeriodicalId":51765,"journal":{"name":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Composition and/as postcolonial shame: Philip Miller’s REwind: a cantata for voice, tape, and testimony\",\"authors\":\"Carina Venter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02533952.2021.1969635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article engages the aporias that arise at the intersection of postcolonial aesthetics, trauma and ethics through a consideration of Philip Miller’s REwind: A Cantata for Voice, Tape, and Testimony, composed to commemorate the tenth anniversary of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Following an introduction of REwind, I briefly touch on the creative instrumentalisation of testimony before considering the lengths to which Miller went to replicate an ethic of reconciliation as it had been instituted by the TRC. What I uncover is an exemplary victim-centred ethics, deployed by Miller, which closely mirrors that of the TRC. Yet, REwind is riven with incommensurabilities, from its white reception to the seminal musical moment that sounds the testimony of Eunice Miya against a musical gesture that signifies convention and cliché. To make sense of these, I turn to the work of Timothy Bewes to enable a framing of REwind in terms of postcolonial shame and incommensurability. That is, I follow Bewes in reading the “difficulties and infelicities” of the text, ”not along a continuum of evaluative aesthetic criteria, but rather as instances of inevitable failure–the inevitable failure of postcolonial aesthetics to meet adequately the imperatives of postcolonial ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2021.1969635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2021.1969635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文通过对菲利普·米勒为纪念南非真相与和解委员会成立十周年而创作的《REwind:a Cantata for Voice,Tape,and Testimony》的思考,探讨了后殖民美学、创伤和伦理交叉点上的寓言。在介绍了REwind之后,我简要地谈到了证词的创造性工具化,然后考虑了Miller在多大程度上复制了真相与和解委员会制定的和解道德。我发现的是米勒所倡导的以受害者为中心的道德规范,这与真相与和解委员会的道德规范非常相似。然而,REwind充满了不可通约性,从它的白人接待到开创性的音乐时刻,这一时刻听起来是尤妮丝·米娅反对一种象征传统和陈词滥调的音乐姿态的见证。为了理解这些,我转向Timothy Bewes的作品,从后殖民的羞耻感和不可通约性的角度来构建REwind。也就是说,我跟随贝维斯阅读文本的“困难和不适当之处”,“不是沿着一个连续的评价美学标准,而是作为不可避免的失败的例子——后殖民美学在充分满足后殖民伦理要求方面的不可避免的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Composition and/as postcolonial shame: Philip Miller’s REwind: a cantata for voice, tape, and testimony
ABSTRACT This article engages the aporias that arise at the intersection of postcolonial aesthetics, trauma and ethics through a consideration of Philip Miller’s REwind: A Cantata for Voice, Tape, and Testimony, composed to commemorate the tenth anniversary of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Following an introduction of REwind, I briefly touch on the creative instrumentalisation of testimony before considering the lengths to which Miller went to replicate an ethic of reconciliation as it had been instituted by the TRC. What I uncover is an exemplary victim-centred ethics, deployed by Miller, which closely mirrors that of the TRC. Yet, REwind is riven with incommensurabilities, from its white reception to the seminal musical moment that sounds the testimony of Eunice Miya against a musical gesture that signifies convention and cliché. To make sense of these, I turn to the work of Timothy Bewes to enable a framing of REwind in terms of postcolonial shame and incommensurability. That is, I follow Bewes in reading the “difficulties and infelicities” of the text, ”not along a continuum of evaluative aesthetic criteria, but rather as instances of inevitable failure–the inevitable failure of postcolonial aesthetics to meet adequately the imperatives of postcolonial ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Social Dynamics is the journal of the Centre for African Studies at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. It has been published since 1975, and is committed to advancing interdisciplinary academic research, fostering debate and addressing current issues pertaining to the African continent. Articles cover the full range of humanities and social sciences including anthropology, archaeology, economics, education, history, literary and language studies, music, politics, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信